Bug#717995: [a...@offog.org: Re: RFS: feedparser/5.1.2-2]

2013-08-01 Thread Adam Sampson
Jakub Wilk writes: > "python" is needed in the clean target, so it must be in Build-Depends > rather than Build-Depends-Indep. OK -- shifted back to Build-Depends, then. I've cut a new upstream release (2.17) which fixes the man page problems lintian spotted, along with some other minor bugs, a

Bug#717995: [a...@offog.org: Re: RFS: feedparser/5.1.2-2]

2013-08-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Adam Sampson , 2013-07-30, 22:59: The python dependencies may actually stay Build-Depends-Indep, but I don't think that the distinction is actually used. So, do as you wish. I'd moved them to Build-Depends because that's what the Python policy and LibraryStyleGuide use in their examples, but r

Bug#717995: [a...@offog.org: Re: RFS: feedparser/5.1.2-2]

2013-07-30 Thread Adam Sampson
- Forwarded message from Adam Sampson - Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:13:42 +0100 From: Adam Sampson To: Etienne Millon Subject: Re: RFS: feedparser/5.1.2-2 Hi Etienne, Thanks very much for looking at the package -- much appreciated! Do you mind if I attach a copy of this to the ITA bug?