Bug#712026: transcriber review

2013-08-12 Thread Giulio Paci
Il 12/08/2013 09:41, Paul Wise ha scritto: > On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 00:05 +0200, Giulio Paci wrote: > > [...] copyright_hints [...] > > Maybe it would be best to drop it entirely, it doesn't seem that useful. I have not yet a strong opinion on it. More often than not, its presence just created sm

Bug#712026: transcriber review

2013-08-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 10:27 +0200, Giulio Paci wrote: > In my opinion it is not: Thanks for the explanation, seems reasonable to leave it for now. BTW: if upstream doesn't respond to your patch requests, sourceforge now has an abandoned project takeover process that you could use to get access t

Bug#712026: transcriber review

2013-08-12 Thread Giulio Paci
Il 12/08/2013 09:41, Paul Wise ha scritto: > A new blocker: > > The upstream website contains this text: > > New! Jul 11 Transcriber has been superseded by TranscriberAG: see > http://transag.sourceforge.net/! > > I wonder if it would be best to replace Transcriber with TranscriberAG > in Debian

Bug#712026: transcriber review

2013-08-12 Thread Paul Wise
A new blocker: The upstream website contains this text: New! Jul 11 Transcriber has been superseded by TranscriberAG: see http://transag.sourceforge.net/! I wonder if it would be best to replace Transcriber with TranscriberAG in Debian. TranscriberAG uses GTK+ and C++ instead of Tcl/Tk. On Mon,

Bug#712026: transcriber review

2013-08-11 Thread Giulio Paci
Il 11/08/2013 19:47, Paul Wise ha scritto: > A review: > > Blockers: > > The changes to debian/copyright_hints look weird, could you explain? I do not understand what you mean. The whole content of debian/copyright_hints usually looks weird to me, but it is useful to: 1) write debian/copyright