Bug#689941: RFS: fvwm/1:2.6.5.ds-1 [ITA]

2012-10-09 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Hi, According to [0], fvwm has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite #689441 title. Please, could you file this ITA bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#689941: RFS: fvwm/1:2.6.5.ds-1 [ITA]

2012-10-08 Thread Vincent W. Chen
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Bart Martens wrote: > For unblocks, the "freeze policy" matters. Here I read that "new upstream > versions" are seen as "significant changes" : > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html > Alright, thanks for the info. I'll forget about getting this int

Bug#689941: RFS: fvwm/1:2.6.5.ds-1 [ITA]

2012-10-07 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 10:52:43PM -0700, Vincent W. Chen wrote: > Some questions: > - According to Clause 5. (a) of > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/rc_policy.txt, I might be able to > request for an unblock from the release team. I don't read anything about unblocks in rc_policy.txt. If you f

Bug#689941: RFS: fvwm/1:2.6.5.ds-1 [ITA]

2012-10-07 Thread Vincent W. Chen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fvwm". Per Bug #684395 and http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/10/msg00068.html, I've decided to adopt this package, with permission from the maintainer Manoj Srivastava. Some notes: -