Bug#674717: Bug#674684: About your qpdfview package on mentors.d.n

2012-06-02 Thread Benjamin Eltzner
Hi Aron, Adam provided a version of qpdfview under GPL-2 (with translations removed) and I built an updated package, which I uploaded on mentors. The Version is 0.3~beta2 but is, according to Adam, close to the 0.3 release to come, for which he is still waiting for some translation work. I hope t

Bug#674717: Bug#674684: About your qpdfview package on mentors.d.n

2012-05-31 Thread Aron Xu
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Benjamin Eltzner wrote: > Hi Aron, > >> qpdfview needs libpoppler, which is licensed under GPL-2 only, but >> qpdfview is GPL-3. The two license are not compatible. Would it be >> possible to ask upstream to re-license the software and release a new >> version? > >

Bug#674717: Bug#674684: About your qpdfview package on mentors.d.n

2012-05-31 Thread Benjamin Eltzner
Hi Aron, > qpdfview needs libpoppler, which is licensed under GPL-2 only, but > qpdfview is GPL-3. The two license are not compatible. Would it be > possible to ask upstream to re-license the software and release a new > version? This is indeed a serious issue. I spoke with the upstream author (A

Bug#674717: Bug#674684: About your qpdfview package on mentors.d.n

2012-05-30 Thread Aron Xu
Hi Benjamin, I can upload it if it's all okay but now I have more concerns regarding the license issue. qpdfview needs libpoppler, which is licensed under GPL-2 only, but qpdfview is GPL-3. The two license are not compatible. Would it be possible to ask upstream to re-license the software and rel