Claudio Matsuoka scripsit:
> Changes made as directed.
Great. You should test it, at least as far as making sure figlet
doesn't choke on the new files.
--
A rose by any other nameJohn Cowan
may smell as sweet, http://www.ccil.org/~cow
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:44 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> Jonathan McCrohan scripsit:
>> During a review of my updated figlet 2.2.4-1 package[1], it was
>> discovered that the fonts directory still contains non-distributable
>> files. An example of these files are the fonts/8859-*.flc files. These
>>
Jonathan McCrohan scripsit:
> During a review of my updated figlet 2.2.4-1 package[1], it was
> discovered that the fonts directory still contains non-distributable
> files. An example of these files are the fonts/8859-*.flc files. These
> files contain the following paragraph: "Unicode, Inc. spec
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Ian Chai wrote:
> Will Bob Marten's suggestion to replace the current fonts/8859-*.flc with
> ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/8859-3.TXT solve the problem,
> then? If so, I vote that we go ahead and do that.
Agreed. Let's allow a few days for FIGlet
On 28/05/2012 18:42, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
It would be great to have these issues solved so that figlet could
continue to be included in the next Debian release.
Will Bob Marten's suggestion to replace the current fonts/8859-*.flc
with ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/8859-3.TXT
[Please keep cc: list intact, so people don't have to subscribe to the
non-public figlet mailinglist]
Hi all,
During a review of my updated figlet 2.2.4-1 package[1], it was
discovered that the fonts directory still contains non-distributable
files. An example of these files are the fonts/8859-*.
6 matches
Mail list logo
