Bug#668076: reSIProcate packages RFS

2012-05-04 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 10/04/12 11:34, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:35:18AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> >> On 09/04/12 10:41, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: Hi, I've recently filed an RFS for reSI

Bug#668076: reSIProcate packages RFS

2012-04-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:35:18AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 09/04/12 10:41, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've recently filed an RFS for reSIProcate > >> > >> http://lists.debian.org/de

Bug#668076: reSIProcate packages RFS

2012-04-09 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 09/04/12 10:41, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I've recently filed an RFS for reSIProcate >> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/04/msg00168.html > > I didn't yet try to build it, but at first glance

Bug#668076: reSIProcate packages RFS

2012-04-09 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi, On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:07:49PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've recently filed an RFS for reSIProcate > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/04/msg00168.html I didn't yet try to build it, but at first glance the packaging looks good. One minor nit: The license