On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> There's no need to be a DD to answer to a (RC) bugreport. There's no
> need to be a DD to answer to a mail announcing an NMU uploaded to
> DELAYED/*5*. I can understand one might need time to prepare an upload
BTW. apart from what
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:05:32PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> wdg-html-validator‽
Forget it. Must have made something wrong when calling your link,
> I'm pointing you to the messages in the buglog of the gpredict package,
> so that you stop lacking context.
Well. I don't understand that...
schoenfeld / in-medias-res <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (16/10/2007):
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > You might not be aware of [1,2,3]. Reading the (originally) Cc'd
> > bugreport might help…
>
> You are right. I'm not aware of this. You are irritating me a bit: The
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> You might not be aware of [1,2,3]. Reading the (originally) Cc'd
> bugreport might help…
You are right. I'm not aware of this. You are irritating me a bit:
The thread was about 'gpredict', not about wdg-html-validator, hu?
And as f
Patrick Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (15/10/2007):
> No? The maintainer of gpredict appearently is active (he answered in
> this thread..) and a DD.
You might not be aware of [1,2,3]. Reading the (originally) Cc'd
bugreport might help…
1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;bug
Le Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:42:54PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld a écrit :
>
> No? The maintainer of gpredict appearently is active (he answered in this
> thread..) and a DD.
Oops, I slipped a few lines when looking at the thread, and thought that
the package was esmtp, which looks unmaintained but i
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:36:26PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> in the past, I followed those rules for an obviously unmanitained
> package, and all it resulted in was that a DD ignored my NMU patch and
> uploaded his own NMU which contained all the fixes I refrained to
> include... (and I think
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:36:26PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Since the maintainer is not a DD and is apparently inactive for one
> year, I would recommend Cyril to ask on -devel, and -qa if he can orphan
> the package, and then propose comprehensive NMU.
If it is to be orphaned, there are two
Le Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 01:03:30PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld a écrit :
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu
>
> It states: "Do not do housekeeping tasks, do not change the name of modules or
> files, do not move directories; in general, do not fix things which
Hi,
IANADD, but...
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 01:28:36AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Shall we open bugs for each and every problem encountered, with
> individual patch, and then check them regularly through the QA? Or fix
yes, thats probably the best way to go.
> them all while we're at it, an
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (14/10/2007):
> Thanks for your NMU Cyril. However I think the above is excessive for
> a simple FTBFS NMU for an otherwise maintained package.
I'm sorry for that. I'm usually tempted to make the packages I upload
lintian-clean, which is often required, or at lea
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 08:52:39PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Changes:
> grig (0.7.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Non-maintainer upload.
>* Remove “-DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED” from src/Makefile.{am,in} to avoid
> FTBFS
> due to the transition to Gtk 2.12 (Closes:
12 matches
Mail list logo
