On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 22:37:48 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
>What happened to format_security.diff?
>Why did you remove it? It should still be valid but maybe needs a rebase.
Ok. I got huzz hint when applying the patch and i forget to record it
here.
That is not the way you should do things: Just dropping
On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 03:49:48PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:20:33 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release (Closes: #1001091)
There is no need to repack the doc directory anymore since 1.9 changed the
license.
I have removed the repa
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:20:33 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release (Closes: #1001091)
There is no need to repack the doc directory anymore since 1.9 changed the
license.
I have removed the repacking stuff in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rush/-/commit/ef5
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:20:33 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
Changes since the last upload:
rush (2.2+dfsg-1.0) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release (Closes: #1001091)
* fix rush FTCBFS (Closes: #929160)
* Update Standards-Version to 4.6.1
* drop
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rush":
* Package name: rush
Version : 2.2+dfsg-1.0
Upstream Author : Sergey Poznyakoff
* URL : http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/software/rush/
* License : c
5 matches
Mail list logo
