Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- restricted user shell

2022-06-17 Thread Bo YU
Control: tags -1 moreinfo The rush package has a new upload: rush (2.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release (Closes: #1001091) * Fix rush FTCBFS (Closes: #929160) * Update Standards-Version to 4.6.1 * Drop debian/patches/intprops.patch(applied upstream) * Drop deb

Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- restricted user shell

2022-06-17 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 17.06.22 um 10:30 schrieb Bo YU: Hi, On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:42:38AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: Am 17.06.22 um 09:20 schrieb Bo YU:    * drop debian/patches/intprops.patch    * drop debian/patches/format_security.diff Please do not expect a possible sponsor to look at your changes wh

Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- restricted user shell

2022-06-17 Thread Bo YU
Hi, On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:42:38AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: Am 17.06.22 um 09:20 schrieb Bo YU:    * drop debian/patches/intprops.patch    * drop debian/patches/format_security.diff Please do not expect a possible sponsor to look at your changes when you have not addressed his previo

Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- restricted user shell

2022-06-17 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 17.06.22 um 09:20 schrieb Bo YU:    * drop debian/patches/intprops.patch    * drop debian/patches/format_security.diff Please do not expect a possible sponsor to look at your changes when you have not addressed his previous comments. You have not included an explanation about the patches.

Bug#1012200: RFS: rush/2.2+dfsg-1 [ITA] -- restricted user shell

2022-06-17 Thread Bo YU
Hi, On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 07:18:23PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: On Fri, 3 Jun 2022 22:37:48 +0800 Bo YU wrote: What happened to format_security.diff? Why did you remove it? It should still be valid but maybe needs a rebase. Ok. I got huzz hint when applying the patch and i forget to reco