Re: Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz

2015-08-12 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2015, 14:25 -0300 schrieb Fernando Toledo: > El 11/08/15 a las 16:31, Joachim Breitner escribió: > > Hi, > > > > Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2015, 14:33 +0200 schrieb Felix Natter: > > > I don't mind fixing this (in the next few days), but also see no > > > problem in filing

Re: Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz

2015-08-12 Thread Fernando Toledo
El 11/08/15 a las 16:31, Joachim Breitner escribió: > Hi, > > Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2015, 14:33 +0200 schrieb Felix Natter: >> I don't mind fixing this (in the next few days), but also see no >> problem in filing a tag=newcomer bug against devscripts >> ("[mk-origtargz]") for fixing in debconf, me

Re: Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz

2015-08-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 09:31:14PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I wanted to know if uscan can handle pandoc, so I just fixed it: > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/devscripts.git/commit/?id=13f5c48414547b627501d782aa502d3b916bb0b7 Very appreciated. Thanks a lot Andreas.

Re: Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz

2015-08-11 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2015, 14:33 +0200 schrieb Felix Natter: > I don't mind fixing this (in the next few days), but also see no problem > in filing a tag=newcomer bug against devscripts ("[mk-origtargz]") for > fixing in debconf, mentioning the workaround. > (This is a pretty bad bug, but it'

Re: Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz

2015-08-09 Thread Felix Natter
Joachim Breitner writes: > Hi, hello Andreas, Joachim, mentors, > Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2015, 11:23 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: >> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 09:56:41AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: >> > I’m missing the context of this mail, >> >> context is in the debian-mentors archive[1] >>

Re: Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz (was: Re: uscan and missing files)

2015-08-09 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2015, 11:23 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 09:56:41AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I’m missing the context of this mail, > > context is in the debian-mentors archive[1] > > > but if it is a work-around for > > the tar bug > > https://bugs.

Re: Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz (was: Re: uscan and missing files)

2015-08-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 09:56:41AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I’m missing the context of this mail, context is in the debian-mentors archive[1] > but if it is a work-around for > the tar bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748244 > then I’d really rather like to see tha

Re: Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz (was: Re: uscan and missing files)

2015-08-09 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2015, 07:35 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Felix, > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:53:39PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > > ... > > What works is this: > > > > $ cat syncterm-1.0.tar | tar --delete syncterm-1.0/3rdp/dist/cryptlib.zip > > > out.tar > > > > --> Would a p

Re: Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz (was: Re: uscan and missing files)

2015-08-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Felix, On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:53:39PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > ... > What works is this: > > $ cat syncterm-1.0.tar | tar --delete syncterm-1.0/3rdp/dist/cryptlib.zip > > out.tar > > --> Would a patch against mk-origtargz that changes to the piped-syntax > for tar invocations be acce

Broken tar invocation in mk-origtargz (was: Re: uscan and missing files)

2015-08-07 Thread Felix Natter
hello Fernando, hello Mentors, Fernando Toledo writes: > El 06/08/15 a las 16:12, Felix Natter escribió: >> I think it is very unlikely that this is due to a bug in uscan >> (also see "deleting 1 files from it." above). > > yes maybe is a bug (very strange) in uscan >> >> Maybe you have an old "