Hello Jakub,
thank you for clarifying.
---
Have a nice day.
Joachim (Germany)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120801001818.17b7e...@jupiter.home
* Joachim Wiedorn , 2012-07-24, 20:43:
debian/control:
* remove lines with "Multi-Arch:"
You only need to remove only Mutli-Arch field which would become
incorrect after demultiarchification. In usually means that you should
drop "Multi-Arch: same", but you can keep "foreign" or "allowed".
Helmut Grohne wrote on 2012-07-25 16:31:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:43:24PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Now you make me wonder. Please explain why this is needed. The original
> question mentioned that the package in question is "Multi-Arch:
> foreign". I do not see an issue with having Mult
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:43:24PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Remove multi-arch support:
Now you make me wonder. Please explain why this is needed. The original
question mentioned that the package in question is "Multi-Arch:
foreign". I do not see an issue with having Multi-Arch:foreign heade
Hello Martin,
Remove multi-arch support:
debian/control:
* remove lines with "Multi-Arch:"
* remove lines with "Pre-Depends:
* Move back to dephelper (>= 8)
debian/compat:
* Move back to "8"
debian/rules:
* Remove lines which looks like support for multi-arch...
debian/*.install:
* chang
Hi,
I contributed updated (and new)manpage translations for a
package which had not been updated for ages. Therefore I
would like to provide the German users of (old)stable with
recent translations.
Last time I made my private backport I had to compile code
extracted from the sources (not part
6 matches
Mail list logo
