Re: Architecture-independent packages with missing build-dependencies on some architectures

2012-09-23 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:18:06 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > I think it would be more appropriate to just close the bug with a > message indicating that the package should be built on a system with > multiarch enabled; where the wine-bin dependency would be satisfied > via wine-bin:i386. Lucas's

Re: Architecture-independent packages with missing build-dependencies on some architectures

2012-09-22 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I maintain the wine-gecko package (wine-gecko-1.4), which is in an > interesting situation because its build-dependencies can't be satisfied on all > architectures, but it builds an "Architecture: all" package. Something > sim

Architecture-independent packages with missing build-dependencies on some architectures

2012-09-22 Thread Stephen Kitt
Dear mentors, I maintain the wine-gecko package (wine-gecko-1.4), which is in an interesting situation because its build-dependencies can't be satisfied on all architectures, but it builds an "Architecture: all" package. Something similar was discussed in March, and as I understand it the consensu