Re: Arch-dependent Build-Depends

2001-07-20 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, I think I want: > > Build-Depends: atlas-dev [!powerpc !m68k !sparc !hppa], lapack-dev > [powerpc m68k sparc hppa] > > > But I don't see the proper syntax for doing this properly. Is that > correct as is above? Yes. > The potato packaging man

Re: Arch-dependent Build-Depends

2001-07-20 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, I think I want: > > Build-Depends: atlas-dev [!powerpc !m68k !sparc !hppa], lapack-dev > [powerpc m68k sparc hppa] > > > But I don't see the proper syntax for doing this properly. Is that > correct as is above? Yes. > The potato packaging ma

Arch-dependent Build-Depends

2001-07-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Greetings, I'm trying to make petsc Build-Depends: on atlas for most arches, but lapack where there is no atlas. Actually, to make things simpler inside the package, I link against lapack on PPC, m68k and sparc, so they can share configuration information, since they are all 32-bit big-endian

Arch-dependent Build-Depends

2001-07-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Greetings, I'm trying to make petsc Build-Depends: on atlas for most arches, but lapack where there is no atlas. Actually, to make things simpler inside the package, I link against lapack on PPC, m68k and sparc, so they can share configuration information, since they are all 32-bit big-endian