Hello all,
I am looking for an Advocate/Sponsor. I have been developing free software
for some time and wish to increase my user base (and developer base too!) by
releasing debian packages for my work (it would also give me a warm and
furry feeling to be assisting with Debian). I have been able
Hello all,
I am looking for an Advocate/Sponsor. I have been developing free software
for some time and wish to increase my user base (and developer base too!) by
releasing debian packages for my work (it would also give me a warm and
furry feeling to be assisting with Debian). I have been
Hi,
I'm looking for an Advocate and a Sponsor for my Debian
NM application. I debianized Elserv. Elserv is an HTTP
server which runs on Emacs. This is distributed under
the GPL. Official web site is follows:
http://www.gohome.org/elserv/
My debian pacakges is follow:
http://www.koka-in.org/~bg6
Hi,
I'm looking for an Advocate and a Sponsor for my Debian
NM application. I debianized Elserv. Elserv is an HTTP
server which runs on Emacs. This is distributed under
the GPL. Official web site is follows:
http://www.gohome.org/elserv/
My debian pacakges is follow:
http://www.koka-in.org/~bg
Hello,
I'm looking for an Advocate and a Sponsor for my Debian NM application.
My qualifications include being a programmer with hands in the LyX
project (http://www.lyx.org/), being the developer of xmms-volnorm
(http://volnorm.sourceforge.net/) this is packaged by Adrian Bunk.
I've recently di
Hello,
I'm looking for an Advocate and a Sponsor for my Debian NM application.
My qualifications include being a programmer with hands in the LyX
project (http://www.lyx.org/), being the developer of xmms-volnorm
(http://volnorm.sourceforge.net/) this is packaged by Adrian Bunk.
I've recently d
> I have begun work on a new version of arla (orphaned by [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> but I'm not done yet. I have gotten it to build, but I need to figure out
> how it should create an source package for building kernel modules.
>
> I haven't filled an ITP yet, because I want to g
> I have begun work on a new version of arla (orphaned by [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> but I'm not done yet. I have gotten it to build, but I need to figure out
> how it should create an source package for building kernel modules.
>
> I haven't filled an ITP yet, because I
source package for building kernel modules.
I haven't filled an ITP yet, because I want to get an advocate/sponsor
first, so I feel that I'm on the right track.
CU
Mikael Andersson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS Sorry for my bad(?) english, it's not my primary language, and it's late in
sweden :-)
DS
source package for building kernel modules.
I haven't filled an ITP yet, because I want to get an advocate/sponsor
first, so I feel that I'm on the right track.
CU
Mikael Andersson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS Sorry for my bad(?) english, it's not my primary language, and it
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 07:07:17PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> >
> > manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to sign a key. i have it
~
> > available in HTML at
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
>
> Nice to see you called it 'Manoj's Singing-Protocol' ;)
cr
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:27:54AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > we should also require them to demonstrate a clear understanding of
> > PKI as part of the NM process.
>
> manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to s
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 07:07:17PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> >
> > manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to sign a key. i have it
~
> > available in HTML at
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
>
> Nice to see you called it 'Manoj's Singing-Protocol' ;)
c
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:27:54AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > we should also require them to demonstrate a clear understanding of
> > PKI as part of the NM process.
>
> manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to
>>"Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Samuel> Well, then why not talk about "id signing" instead of "key
Samuel> signing" which exists but designates a completely different
Samuel> thing that also exists in GPG?
Because these procedures have been known as key signin
>>"Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Samuel> Well, then why not talk about "id signing" instead of "key
Samuel> signing" which exists but designates a completely different
Samuel> thing that also exists in GPG?
Because these procedures have been known as key signi
On 29/06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
| Actually, the real flaw seems to be that my email assumed that
| the protocol was going to be used by people who had a modicum of
| inductive reasoning. The outline mentions just one ID in the key
| being verified and signed, and I assumed that anyone
>>"Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Samuel> It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign an
Samuel> id. That means that checking for one e-mail address for being
Samuel> valid and signing all the ids is just bogus. You may use this
Samuel> protocol, but you hav
On 29/06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
| Actually, the real flaw seems to be that my email assumed that
| the protocol was going to be used by people who had a modicum of
| inductive reasoning. The outline mentions just one ID in the key
| being verified and signed, and I assumed that anyone
>>"Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Samuel> It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign an
Samuel> id. That means that checking for one e-mail address for being
Samuel> valid and signing all the ids is just bogus. You may use this
Samuel> protocol, but you ha
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:48:53AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Danie,
>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Danie Roux wrote:
>
> > I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> > going to be easy though.
>
> A developer does not have to be physically proximate to you to b
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:48:53AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Danie,
>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Danie Roux wrote:
>
> > I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> > going to be easy though.
>
> A developer does not have to be physically proximate to you to
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> On 28/06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> | * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
> | > Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
> | > had been under the impression that other forms of identification
> | > were still p
On 28/06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
| > Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
| > had been under the impression that other forms of identification
| > were still possible, though severely discouraged.
|
| Yeah, those
On 28/06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
| http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
|
| it does have some weaknesses, but it is a lot stronger than the ``oh,
| i've met you, i have checked your ID, and off we go''
|
| comments welcome.
It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> we should also require them to demonstrate a clear understanding of
> PKI as part of the NM process.
manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to sign a key. i have it
available in HTML at
http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysig
* Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
> Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
> had been under the impression that other forms of identification
> were still possible, though severely discouraged.
Yeah, those forms still exist. The web site even says
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I think that now an advocate is needed to simply say that they agree with
> your application, and be a mentor of sorts.
> After an advocate is found, an application manager is assigned.
> I don't think that there is any requirement for an actual physi
I think that now an advocate is needed to simply say that they agree with
your application, and be a mentor of sorts.
After an advocate is found, an application manager is assigned.
I don't think that there is any requirement for an actual physical meeting.
Photo ID appears to be acceptible.
>
>
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> On 28/06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> | * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
> | > Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
> | > had been under the impression that other forms of identification
> | > were still
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:31:54AM -0500, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> You need a signed gpg key, but not an advocate when you apply -- the
> message currently printed is not clear, though. I have fixed that
> now. (It should have said that you needed a GPG signd key.)
Does the GPG key need to be
Danie,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Danie Roux wrote:
> I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> going to be easy though.
A developer does not have to be physically proximate to you to be your
advocate; in fact, it doesn't have to be your advocate who signs your key
On 28/06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
| > Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
| > had been under the impression that other forms of identification
| > were still possible, though severely discouraged.
|
| Yeah, thos
On 28/06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
| http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
|
| it does have some weaknesses, but it is a lot stronger than the ``oh,
| i've met you, i have checked your ID, and off we go''
|
| comments welcome.
It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> we should also require them to demonstrate a clear understanding of
> PKI as part of the NM process.
manoj came up with a pretty good protocol to sign a key. i have it
available in HTML at
http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysi
* Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
> Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
> had been under the impression that other forms of identification
> were still possible, though severely discouraged.
Yeah, those forms still exist. The web site even says
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> I think that now an advocate is needed to simply say that they agree with
> your application, and be a mentor of sorts.
> After an advocate is found, an application manager is assigned.
> I don't think that there is any requirement for an actual phys
* Mikael Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010628 14:29]:
> I have a question about that. I filled in the webform on
> http://nm.debian.org/newnm.php last week, checked every botton except
> the gpg key and if I have an advocate.
> The webform warned about that I haven't got my key signed etc.
> Shou
I think that now an advocate is needed to simply say that they agree with
your application, and be a mentor of sorts.
After an advocate is found, an application manager is assigned.
I don't think that there is any requirement for an actual physical meeting.
Photo ID appears to be acceptible.
>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:31:54AM -0500, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> You need a signed gpg key, but not an advocate when you apply -- the
> message currently printed is not clear, though. I have fixed that
> now. (It should have said that you needed a GPG signd key.)
Does the GPG key need to be
Danie,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Danie Roux wrote:
> I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> going to be easy though.
A developer does not have to be physically proximate to you to be your
advocate; in fact, it doesn't have to be your advocate who signs your ke
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian,
> an advocate geographically near will contact you for meeting. You need to
> meet him/her to prove your identity so debian allows you to join the
> community. see http://nm.debian.o
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:53:55 +0200, Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> going to be easy though.
>
> For now I want a sponsor to get garchiver in to Debian.
sorry i got confused... i'm currently appliing to becom
* Mikael Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010628 14:29]:
> I have a question about that. I filled in the webform on
> http://nm.debian.org/newnm.php last week, checked every botton except
> the gpg key and if I have an advocate.
> The webform warned about that I haven't got my key signed etc.
> Sho
I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
going to be easy though.
For now I want a sponsor to get garchiver in to Debian.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:38:36PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian,
Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian, an
advocate geographically near will contact you for meeting. You need to meet
him/her to prove your identity so debian allows you to join the community. see
http://nm.debian.org/ for more info.
--
Robert Millan
Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian,
> an advocate geographically near will contact you for meeting. You need to
> meet him/her to prove your identity so debian allows you to join the
> community. see http://nm.debian.
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:53:55 +0200, Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
> going to be easy though.
>
> For now I want a sponsor to get garchiver in to Debian.
sorry i got confused... i'm currently appliing to beco
I would love to have an advocate. Being in Pretoria, South Africa that's not
going to be easy though.
For now I want a sponsor to get garchiver in to Debian.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:38:36PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian
Do you mean an advocate? When you submit your appliance to join debian, an advocate
geographically near will contact you for meeting. You need to meet him/her to prove
your identity so debian allows you to join the community. see http://nm.debian.org/
for more info.
--
Robert Millan
I was wondering if anyone would be willing to sponsor my application to be a
new maintainer. Currently, I've packaged alienwave, a simple curses-based
console game of the space invaders genre. I've also packaged the latest
version of faqomatic, which was orphaned by Scott K. Ellis.
Both alienwav
I was wondering if anyone would be willing to sponsor my application to be a
new maintainer. Currently, I've packaged alienwave, a simple curses-based
console game of the space invaders genre. I've also packaged the latest
version of faqomatic, which was orphaned by Scott K. Ellis.
Both alienwa
Debian Mentors:
I am looking for a sponsor/advocate for becoming a debian developer. I am
packaging misterhouse, a home automation package written in perl. I have
signed up at http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/. The
misterhouse debian package can be found at
http://www.running
Debian Mentors:
I am looking for a sponsor/advocate for becoming a debian developer. I am
packaging misterhouse, a home automation package written in perl. I have
signed up at http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/. The
misterhouse debian package can be found at
http://www.runnin
54 matches
Mail list logo
