Re: Advice on source package name for multibinary packages

2002-07-08 Thread Simon Richter
Pablo, > In which cases one is allowed to change upstream package name for the > tarball. For instance, if I am packaging just 3 binary components out of 10 > in a package named "useless-components-all", should I change the source > package name to "useless-components-not-all" or something else th

Re: Advice on source package name for multibinary packages

2002-07-08 Thread Simon Richter
Pablo, > In which cases one is allowed to change upstream package name for the > tarball. For instance, if I am packaging just 3 binary components out of 10 > in a package named "useless-components-all", should I change the source > package name to "useless-components-not-all" or something else t

Advice on source package name for multibinary packages

2002-07-07 Thread Pablo Lorenzzoni
Hello ALL! In which cases one is allowed to change upstream package name for the tarball. For instance, if I am packaging just 3 binary components out of 10 in a package named "useless-components-all", should I change the source package name to "useless-components-not-all" or something else tha

Advice on source package name for multibinary packages

2002-07-07 Thread Pablo Lorenzzoni
Hello ALL! In which cases one is allowed to change upstream package name for the tarball. For instance, if I am packaging just 3 binary components out of 10 in a package named "useless-components-all", should I change the source package name to "useless-components-not-all" or something else th