Brandon Barnes wrote:
> OK. How about now?
now, it is good. package uploaded, thanks.
if you want/need further sponsoring, contact me off-list:
http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/sponsoring.html#contact
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
Resending message to debian-mentors list.
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:02:38 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon Barnes wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
>
> good, except...
OK. How about now?
-Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:02:38 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon Barnes wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
>
> good, except...
OK. How about now?
-Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
good, except:
* 3.7.2.2 as standards version is over precise, should be only 3.7.2.
* debian/copyright should have a reference to the full license text in
/usr/share/common-licenses; look at e.g
Daniel-
Re: xevil
Ok. I've added a manpage, tested it, added the gpl blurb to the
copyright file, and updated the standards version. I'm ready for you to
test my package.
For your convenience, here is the link to the dsc:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
-Bra
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> Where do I put the man page? I put it in the debian directory, as
> specified in the New Maintainer's Guide. Not specified, exactly, but
> vaguely alluded to. Anyway, that didn't work. Where am I supposed to
> put it?
in the debian directory, and install it with either a dh
Where do I put the man page? I put it in the debian directory, as
specified in the New Maintainer's Guide. Not specified, exactly, but
vaguely alluded to. Anyway, that didn't work. Where am I supposed to
put it?
-Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Just got back home late Saturday night, and have been settling in. Just
getting back to packaging xevil now.
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:58:06 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > take your time, enjoy christmas/new year
>
> Hi,
>
> what is the current state?
>
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> take your time, enjoy christmas/new year
Hi,
what is the current state?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> Thanks, Daniel. I changed the standards version. I'm not sure what you
> meant about the GPL blurb. Did you mean to include the entire GPL text
> in debian/copyright? I'll write the man page next. I found an article
> on writing man pages. It looks pretty easy; I just haven'
On 12/18/06, Brandon Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, Daniel. I changed the standards version. I'm not sure what you
meant about the GPL blurb. Did you mean to include the entire GPL text
in debian/copyright?
No, you just need to say the full "This program is free software; you
can mod
Thanks, Daniel. I changed the standards version. I'm not sure what you
meant about the GPL blurb. Did you mean to include the entire GPL text
in debian/copyright? I'll write the man page next. I found an article
on writing man pages. It looks pretty easy; I just haven't done it
before.
I'm going t
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> However, please bump the standards version to the current one, write a
> manpage for 'serverping', and I'm happy to sponsor it.
Oh, and I forgot: Please include the full GPL blurb in debian/copyright,
look at libextractor if unsure.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burg
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> The source is at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil
Please include also the URI to the *.dsc file, otherwise I have to fire
up a browser just because of that.
> I can email the binary to anyone who asks. It looks like
> mentors.debian.net doesn't accept bi
Oh yeah. Sorry about that.
The source is at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil
I can email the binary to anyone who asks. It looks like
mentors.debian.net doesn't accept binaries.
-Brandon
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:18:25 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon B
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> I'm new, so I'll need the help of a sponsor.
Have you an updated package ready? If so, where do we find it?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel
I would like to adopt the package, xevil. It is a side-scrolling, evil,
bloody, kill them before they kill you game. It is GPL software. It's
upstream site is xevil.com . This package has been orphaned since
February 2006. It's ITA Bug # is 353389. I have some experience
packaging software for a de
* Pierre Ancelot [Wed, 12 Jan 2005 04:55:36 +0100]:
> Yes, okay, well thank you anibal and thank you all of you, seems i've done
> everything the wrong way :/
In fact you didn't. You did the very first right thing to do, which is
to read documentation and get to know the procedures. If only
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 04:40, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Oh, okay, seemed logical to me that hwtools was the package hwtools...
> If you use that line, your 'owner 211921 [EMAIL PROTECTED]' will
> fail, unless you use 'package wnpp' before 'owner 211921
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
> It
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:22:14AM +0100, Pierre Ancelot wrote:
> Hi, i am adopting a package to maintain.
> As it is my very first package, i'm reading many things actualy.
> i sent a mail to adopt it to the control server and set it as ITA
Its good that you want to help, and this will be a good
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:19:46PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:22:14AM +0100, Pierre Ancelot wrote:
>>>package hwtools
If you use that line, your 'owner 211921 [EMAIL PROTECTED]' will
fail, unless you use 'package wnpp' before 'owner 211921
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
>>Ignor
Thank you to tell me, i sure was wrong on this i won't forget next time.
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 04:30, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Also: Pierre, note that the 'retitle to ITA' expression means that you
> change the "O" bit by "ITA", not that you change the full title to ITA
> (if you do
> This is causing the problem with the 'owner' command -- although the bug
> refers to the hwtools package, it's actually reported against the "Work
> Needed and Prospective Packages" pseudo-package.
Not sure, does it mean i can't adopt it ?
owner 211921 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <--- this syntax
* Matthew Palmer [Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:19:46 +1100]:
> > > retitle 211921 ITA
> > Bug#211921: O: hwtools -- Collection of tools for low-level hardware
> > management
> > Changed Bug title.
> This actually shows a bug in debbugs -- it should have failed to allow you
> to change this bug title...
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:22:14AM +0100, Pierre Ancelot wrote:
> > package hwtools
> Ignoring bugs not assigned to: hwtools
This is causing the problem with the 'owner' command -- although the bug
refers to the hwtools package, it's actually reported against the "Work
Needed and Prospective Packa
Hi, i am adopting a package to maintain.
As it is my very first package, i'm reading many things actualy.
i sent a mail to adopt it to the control server and set it as ITA
I chosen this package since i have skills in hardware programming and C
programming in general and i wish to help in debia
26 matches
Mail list logo
