On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:08:50PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
> > Or maybe MS could get out of the habit of hiding file extensions.
>
> ... but those file extension thingys are just too confusing! How am I
> supposed to know what they mean? The computer should just do what I want!
s/I want/M\$ want
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:08:50PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
> > Or maybe MS could get out of the habit of hiding file extensions.
>
> ... but those file extension thingys are just too confusing! How am I
> supposed to know what they mean? The computer should just do what I want!
s/I want/M\$ wan
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:08:50PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
> I don't think the warning that macros could be virii actually achieves
> anything. Users just hit the "Yeah, whatever" button and get infected
> anyway. Hitting those buttons becomes a reflex with no thought at all.
Well, at least they
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 11:08:50PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
> I don't think the warning that macros could be virii actually achieves
> anything. Users just hit the "Yeah, whatever" button and get infected
> anyway. Hitting those buttons becomes a reflex with no thought at all.
Well, at least they
Hello Mark,
Tuesday, July 24, 2001, 2:41:53 PM, you wrote:
> FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> is what appears on that page.
Me too (aprx. 2 a week)
that is if for a moment we forget about all that spam that the
mailing lists have been getting lately :(
Hello Mark,
Tuesday, July 24, 2001, 2:41:53 PM, you wrote:
> FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> is what appears on that page.
Me too (aprx. 2 a week)
that is if for a moment we forget about all that spam that the
mailing lists have been getting lately :(
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, Word and Outlook warn you if you open a file with macros that
> the macros may be viruses. Outlook could look for attachments which
> have executable extensions and do the same thing.
I don't think the warning that macros could be virii actually
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Would you think MS would release an Outlook update that would address this
> > in some way? It's not exactly a new trick.
>
> Update for which part exactly? The biggest problem are still the user
> who either click on every attach
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, Word and Outlook warn you if you open a file with macros that
> the macros may be viruses. Outlook could look for attachments which
> have executable extensions and do the same thing.
I don't think the warning that macros could be virii actuall
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 07:58:22PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > Would you think MS would release an Outlook update that would address this
> > in some way? It's not exactly a new trick.
>
> Update for which part exactly? The biggest problem are still the user
> who either click on every attac
On 01-07-25 Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:55:34AM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> > I got two already to my home email and one through my debian.org
> > address, all from different people. Now it's funny to see just how far
> > this one is spread already (I never got that many v
On 01-07-25 Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:55:34AM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> > I got two already to my home email and one through my debian.org
> > address, all from different people. Now it's funny to see just how far
> > this one is spread already (I never got that many
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:57:36AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> > > is what appears on that page.
> >
> > I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hours through
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is beginning to drive
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:57:36AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> > > is what appears on that page.
> >
> > I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hours through
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is beginning to drive
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:55:34AM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> I got two already to my home email and one through my debian.org
> address, all from different people. Now it's funny to see just how far
> this one is spread already (I never got that many virus mails in such a
> short time span), b
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:55:34AM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> I got two already to my home email and one through my debian.org
> address, all from different people. Now it's funny to see just how far
> this one is spread already (I never got that many virus mails in such a
> short time span),
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:55:34AM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> I got two already to my home email and one through my debian.org
> address, all from different people. Now it's funny to see just how far
> this one is spread already (I never got that many virus mails in such a
> short time span), b
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 01:55:34AM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> I got two already to my home email and one through my debian.org
> address, all from different people. Now it's funny to see just how far
> this one is spread already (I never got that many virus mails in such a
> short time span),
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 08:29:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:41:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> > is what appears on that page.
>
> I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hour
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 08:29:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> > is what appears on that page.
>
> I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hours through
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is beginning to drive me nuts
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:41:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> is what appears on that page.
I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hours through
[EMAIL PROTECTED] It is beginning to drive me nuts. They're comi
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 08:29:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:41:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> > is what appears on that page.
>
> I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hou
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 08:29:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> > is what appears on that page.
>
> I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hours through
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is beginning to drive me nut
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:41:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> FWIW, I get virtually no spam through my debian.org e-mail address which
> is what appears on that page.
I am getting a W32.Sircam virus attachment every few hours through
[EMAIL PROTECTED] It is beginning to drive me nuts. They're com
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:38:52PM +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> I'll soon apply to become a Debian maintainer, and I have a question
> related to the email address I should use.
> As all emails are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/people , I'm afraid
> of receiving spam. Should I use a free
also sprach Ludovic Drolez (on Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:38:52PM +0200):
> As all emails are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/people , I'm afraid
> of receiving spam. Should I use a free email account like 'ldrolez at
> hotmail.com'
> or my lifetime email 'ludo at drolez com' ?
um, your clear text
Hi !
I'll soon apply to become a Debian maintainer, and I have a question
related to the email address I should use.
As all emails are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/people , I'm afraid
of receiving spam. Should I use a free email account like 'ldrolez at
hotmail.com'
or my lifetime emai
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:38:52PM +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> I'll soon apply to become a Debian maintainer, and I have a question
> related to the email address I should use.
> As all emails are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/people , I'm afraid
> of receiving spam. Should I use a fre
also sprach Ludovic Drolez (on Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:38:52PM +0200):
> As all emails are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/people , I'm afraid
> of receiving spam. Should I use a free email account like 'ldrolez at
> hotmail.com'
> or my lifetime email 'ludo at drolez com' ?
um, your clear tex
Hi !
I'll soon apply to become a Debian maintainer, and I have a question
related to the email address I should use.
As all emails are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/people , I'm afraid
of receiving spam. Should I use a free email account like 'ldrolez at
hotmail.com'
or my lifetime email
30 matches
Mail list logo
