On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 12:26:54PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:23:48PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > The 'install' target is a convenient way to separate the installation
> > (from the perspective of the upstream source) from installation of
> > packaging metadata.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 12:26:54PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:23:48PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > The 'install' target is a convenient way to separate the installation
> > (from the perspective of the upstream source) from installation of
> > packaging metadata.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:23:48PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 09:17:25PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > As you see, all the dh_install commands are in the binary target, so in fact
> > 'install' do not fully install the package.
> >
> > I think it is better for 'in
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 09:17:25PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> As you see, all the dh_install commands are in the binary target, so in fact
> 'install' do not fully install the package.
>
> I think it is better for 'install' to really install, so that
> we can make debian/rules install and loo
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ dh_make sample debian/rules file ]
> As you see, all the dh_install commands are in the binary target, so in fact
> 'install' do not fully install the package.
>
> I think it is better for 'install' to really install, so that
> we can make debian/rule
Hello Developers,
dh_make produce a debian/rules that look like this (for a single binary
package).
build:
dh_testdir
clean:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean
install: build
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs
binary: b
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 09:17:25PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> As you see, all the dh_install commands are in the binary target, so in fact
> 'install' do not fully install the package.
>
> I think it is better for 'install' to really install, so that
> we can make debian/rules install and loo
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ dh_make sample debian/rules file ]
> As you see, all the dh_install commands are in the binary target, so in fact
> 'install' do not fully install the package.
>
> I think it is better for 'install' to really install, so that
> we can make debian/rule
Hello Developers,
dh_make produce a debian/rules that look like this (for a single binary package).
build:
dh_testdir
clean:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean
install: build
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs
binary: bu
9 matches
Mail list logo
