"LI Daobing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am waiting for a DD help me upload this packge. Can you upload this
> packge for me?
No, sorry, I won't have any time.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (
On 7/2/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"LI Daobing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "LI Daobing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > These two files were not added by me. they are in the original
>> > source[1]. so I think I have to
"LI Daobing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "LI Daobing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > These two files were not added by me. they are in the original
>> > source[1]. so I think I have to repackage the source if I want to clear
>> > the warn
On 6/30/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"LI Daobing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These two files were not added by me. they are in the original
> source[1]. so I think I have to repackage the source if I want to clear
> the warnings.
Ah, I wasn't aware of that. Upstream has to fix
"LI Daobing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These two files were not added by me. they are in the original
> source[1]. so I think I have to repackage the source if I want to clear
> the warnings.
>
> [1]
> $ tar tzvf qterm_0.4.0pre4.orig.tar.gz | grep ex$
> -rw-r--r-- nichloas/nichloas1877 2003
"LI Daobing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These two files were not added by me. they are in the original
> source[1]. so I think I have to repackage the source if I want to clear
> the warnings.
Ah, I wasn't aware of that. Upstream has to fix that, you should add a
note for ftp-master so that th
On 6/29/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"LI Daobing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > $ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
>> > W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
>> > W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.sgml.ex
>> > [/2]
>>
>>
Hi,
> On 6/29/06, Lars Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
>> > warnings[2], linda report similar warnings.
>> >
>> > [2]
>> > $ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
>> > W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/m
"LI Daobing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > $ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
>> > W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
>> > W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.sgml.ex
>> > [/2]
>>
>> why don't you fix these warnings? In this case, it sh
On 6/29/06, Lars Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
> warnings[2], linda report similar warnings.
>
> [2]
> $ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
> W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
> W: qterm sourc
Hi,
> It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
> warnings[2], linda report similar warnings.
>
> [2]
> $ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
> W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
> W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.sgml.e
Hello,
I have papared a new deb package for qterm(0.4.0pre4-1), it provide a
new upstream. It can be download from [1].
[1] https://alioth.debian.org/project/showfiles.php?group_id=30987
It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
warnings[2], linda report similar warnings.
[2]
On 3/15/06, LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> [2]
> $ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
> W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.1.ex
> W: qterm source: dh-make-template-in-source debian/manpage.sgml.ex
> [/2]
>
If you have a manpage for qterm already, plea
re-upload, add a patch to fix the mis-spell iconname.
--
LI Daobing
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:12:36PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
> warnings[2], linda report similar warnings. I don't know what's the
> most proper way to deal with these warnings.
>
> [2]
> $ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.changes
> W: q
On 3/15/06, Feifei Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did u use dh_make to debianize the source dir?
>
> May be deleting the *ex file will solve this.
I have deleted it. but the lintian and linda also check the origin
source package, so it still give warnings.
--
LI Daobing
On 3/15/06, Wolfgang Lonien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi LI,
Hi,
>
> I think you didn't provide a manpage - that is why the .ex (example)
> files are still there. According to the policy, you should provide a
> manpage for your package.
I provide. the source is debian/qterm.dbk. the .ex files
LI Daobing wrote:
> Hello,
Hi LI,
> I have papared a new deb package...
> It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
> warnings[2], linda report similar warnings. I don't know what's the
> most proper way to deal with these warnings.
>
> [2]
> $ lintian qterm_0.4.0pre4-1_source.
Hello,
I have papared a new deb package for qterm(0.4.0pre4-1), it fix a
FTBFS for g++-4.1 bug. It can be download from [1].
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qterm/
It's not lintian and linda clean. lintian report following
warnings[2], linda report similar warnings. I don't know
Hello,
qterm can't build with the newest g++, so I prepare a new debian
package 0.4.0pre3-3[1], it's lintian and linda clean. I have upload it
to mentors[2].
[1]
qterm (0.4.0pre3-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* libstdc++ allocator transition:
- debian/control: build depends on libarts1-dev
On Saturday 05 November 2005 02:24, LI Daobing wrote:
> New version(0.4.0pre3-2), fix a serious bug[1]. uploaded to mentors[2].
> lintian, linda, pbuilder clean. Thanks.
Uploaded.
One minor issue: you added debian/README.Debian to the debian/docs. I'm not
very familiar with CDBS but since it cal
Hello,
New version(0.4.0pre3-2), fix a serious bug[1]. uploaded to mentors[2].
lintian, linda, pbuilder clean. Thanks.
[1]
qterm (0.4.0pre3-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* rebuild depends on libssl-dev (>= 0.9.8-1)
* configure with '--enable-arts --enable-esd'
* patches/02-openssl.dpatch:
On 9/13/05, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Steve Langasek [Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:02:55 -0700]:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
>
> > > > * debian/rules:
> > > > DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
> > > > This sucks, the generated control file i
* Steve Langasek [Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:02:55 -0700]:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> > > * debian/rules:
> > > DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
> > > This sucks, the generated control file is ugly as hell (it does
> > > build-depend on build-essential, et
Re: LI Daobing in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> a manpage for a gui program without argument supporting is useless,
> and many one do not write manpages[1]
>
> [1] http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tbinary-without-manpage.html
Citing linitian warnings as an excuse not to fix bugs is certainly
strange.
>
On 13-Sep-2005, LI Daobing wrote:
> On 9/13/05, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not write a manpage? There are tools that automate that. (And
> > if you do not like roff, you can still use pod, etc.)
> a manpage for a gui program without argument supporting is useless,
I strongly
On 9/13/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
>
> > > * debian/rules:
> > > DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
> > > This sucks, the generated control file is ugly as hell (it does
> > > build-depend on build-essential,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> > * debian/rules:
> > DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL := yes
> > This sucks, the generated control file is ugly as hell (it does
> > build-depend on build-essential, etc.). Please fix that.
> I don't agree, at least it works.
No,
On 9/13/05, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: LI Daobing in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I need a uploader for the new version of qterm. it's not lintian and
> > linda clean(without-manpages). I have uploaded it to mentors[1], and
> > submit it at sponsors.
>
> Why not write a manpage? Th
Re: LI Daobing in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I need a uploader for the new version of qterm. it's not lintian and
> linda clean(without-manpages). I have uploaded it to mentors[1], and
> submit it at sponsors.
Why not write a manpage? There are tools that automate that. (And if
you do not like roff, yo
Hello,
I need a uploader for the new version of qterm. it's not lintian and
linda clean(without-manpages). I have uploaded it to mentors[1], and
submit it at sponsors.
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qterm/
[2] http://sponsors.debian.net/viewpkg.php?id=60
Does anyone want help m
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:13:34PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> Version: 0.4.0pre2.ds.3-2
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed-By: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Description:
> qterm - BBS client for X Window System written in Qt
> Cha
but they are really exist, anyone know why?
$ dpkg -L qterm | grep pixmaps
/usr/share/pixmaps
/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_16x16.xpm
/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_32x32.xpm
On 8/13/05, Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:13:34PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> > W: qterm; The
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:13:34PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> W: qterm; The command /usr/bin/qterm"
> icon32x32="/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_32x32.xpm"
> icon16x16="/usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_16x16.xpm listed in a menu file
> does not exist.
>
Hi there,
It looks like /usr/share/pixmaps/qterm_32x32.xp
Version: 0.4.0pre2.ds.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
qterm - BBS client for X Window System written in Qt
Changes:
qterm (0.4.0pre2.ds.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* ABI transition
35 matches
Mail list logo
