RFS: digitaldj

2004-07-09 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, I'm the current maintainer of digitaldj and I've packaged the new upstream version. My former sponsor was to busy, so maybe somebody else can upload it for me. You'll find it at http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/digitaldj/ version 0.7.5 is the latest. grts Tim

RFS: digitaldj

2004-07-09 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, I'm the current maintainer of digitaldj and I've packaged the new upstream version. My former sponsor was to busy, so maybe somebody else can upload it for me. You'll find it at http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/digitaldj/ version 0.7.5 is the latest. grts Tim -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:43:16 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:32:17AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Much better, but one more nit: > > > > > > > + Includes fix from last NMU (Closes: #104974) > >

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:43:16 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:32:17AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Much better, but one more nit: > > > > > > > + Includes fix from last NMU (Closes: #104974) > >

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030916 16:50]: >> ... unless you use the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage to include the >> changelog entries from all the NMUs, which I personally think should be >> best practice. > > Ack. Can this please be added to the developer ref

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Andreas Barth
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030916 16:50]: > ... unless you use the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage to include the > changelog entries from all the NMUs, which I personally think should be > best practice. Ack. Can this please be added to the developer reference? Cheers, Andi -- http:

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030916 16:50]: >> ... unless you use the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage to include the >> changelog entries from all the NMUs, which I personally think should be >> best practice. > > Ack. Can this please be added to the developer ref

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 03:22:03PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > In this case, it is important to note what actually changed in the > > package. Personally, I dislike the "maintainer upload, closes:" > > convention, and prefer to r

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Yes, I was referring to the second paragraph in section 6.3.1 of the > developer's reference: > > > Focus on what was changed---who, how and when are usually less > > important. Having said that, remember to politely attribute peopl

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:32:17AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Much better, but one more nit: > > > > > + Includes fix from last NMU (Closes: #104974) > > > > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Andreas Barth
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030916 16:50]: > ... unless you use the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage to include the > changelog entries from all the NMUs, which I personally think should be > best practice. Ack. Can this please be added to the developer reference? Cheers, Andi -- http:

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 03:22:03PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > In this case, it is important to note what actually changed in the > > package. Personally, I dislike the "maintainer upload, closes:" > > convention, and prefer to r

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Yes, I was referring to the second paragraph in section 6.3.1 of the > developer's reference: > > > Focus on what was changed---who, how and when are usually less > > important. Having said that, remember to politely attribute peopl

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:32:17AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Much better, but one more nit: > > > > > + Includes fix from last NMU (Closes: #104974) > > > > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:51:00 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:55:00PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > You can find at: > > > > http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/ > > Much better, but one more nit: > > > + Includes fix from last NMU (C

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:51:00 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:55:00PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > You can find at: > > > > http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/ > > Much better, but one more nit: > > > + Includes fix from last NMU (C

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:55:00PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > You can find at: > > http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/ Much better, but one more nit: > + Includes fix from last NMU (Closes: #104974) http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:54:48 +0200 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There was an NMU by Martin A. Godisch since the last time the > > package was uploaded. Your new package erases that upload from the >

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:55:00PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > You can find at: > > http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/ Much better, but one more nit: > + Includes fix from last NMU (Closes: #104974) http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:54:48 +0200 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There was an NMU by Martin A. Godisch since the last time the > > package was uploaded. Your new package erases that upload from the >

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > There was an NMU by Martin A. Godisch since the last time the package > was uploaded. Your new package erases that upload from the changelog > and make

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > There was an NMU by Martin A. Godisch since the last time the package > was uploaded. Your new package erases that upload from the changelog > and make

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had > > time for debian packaging for a while. But lately I have, I also had > > my k

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had > > time for debian packaging for a while. But lately I have, I also had > > my k

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had > time for debian packaging for a while. But lately I have, I also had my key > signed by a DD (2 days ago) so that's also sorted out. > Not being a DD yet, I can'

[RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-14 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had time for debian packaging for a while. But lately I have, I also had my key signed by a DD (2 days ago) so that's also sorted out. Not being a DD yet, I can't upload it myself, but I have prepared a package for the newest d

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had > time for debian packaging for a while. But lately I have, I also had my key signed > by a DD (2 days ago) so that's also sorted out. > Not being a DD yet, I can'

[RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-14 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had time for debian packaging for a while. But lately I have, I also had my key signed by a DD (2 days ago) so that's also sorted out. Not being a DD yet, I can't upload it myself, but I have prepared a package for the newest d