Josip Rodin dijo:
> That's primarily because it's worked like this for years, and because people
> shouldn't ever need this as the bugs shouldn't get wrongly closed and then
> neglected for a month. Theoretically, bugs shouldn't reappear in newer
> releases of software, too :)
IMNSHO, the bug is f
Josip Rodin dijo:
> That's primarily because it's worked like this for years, and because people
> shouldn't ever need this as the bugs shouldn't get wrongly closed and then
> neglected for a month. Theoretically, bugs shouldn't reappear in newer
> releases of software, too :)
IMNSHO, the bug is
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> > This is the answer I get from the BTS:
> [...]
> > I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore?
>
> Unfortunately not, although the B
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:26:37AM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> > This is the answer I get from the BTS:
> >
> > Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > > Processing
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> > This is the answer I get from the BTS:
> [...]
> > I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore?
>
> Unfortunately not, although the
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:26:37AM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> > This is the answer I get from the BTS:
> >
> > Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > > Processin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
>
> Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> reopen 109629
> > Bug number 109629 no
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
>
> Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> reopen 109629
> > Bug number 109629 no
First, thanks for your quick reply :-)
Santiago Vila dijo:
> After a bug is archived, it is available for search, but its history
> is "frozen", so no commands to change its status are accepted.
Ack.
> Somebody suggested once a "resurrect" command for this, but not everybody
> likes the idea of
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
[...]
> I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore?
Unfortunately not, although the BTS administrators s
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
>
> Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> reopen 109629
> > Bug number 109629 no
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
>
> Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> reopen 109629
> > Bug number 109629 n
Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
>
> Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> reopen 109629
> > Bug number 109629 not found.
> >
> >> tags 109629 upstream
> >
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
>
> Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> reopen 109629
> > Bug number 109629 n
First, thanks for your quick reply :-)
Santiago Vila dijo:
> After a bug is archived, it is available for search, but its history
> is "frozen", so no commands to change its status are accepted.
Ack.
> Somebody suggested once a "resurrect" command for this, but not everybody
> likes the idea o
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
[...]
> I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore?
Unfortunately not, although the BTS administrators
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
>
> Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> reopen 109629
> > Bug number 109629 n
I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
This is the answer I get from the BTS:
Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> reopen 109629
> Bug number 109629 not found.
>
>> tags 109629 upstream
> Bug number 109629 not found.
>
I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
This is the answer I get from the BTS:
Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> reopen 109629
> Bug number 109629 not found.
>
>> tags 109629 upstream
> Bug number 109629 not found.
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
