On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 08:43:35PM -0300, Dani wrote:
> 2005/7/9, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Indeed, gcc will be a complicated beast to package for a personal
> > project. You might also refer to some OTHER existing packages, which
> > creates multiple binary packages, as a reference
I will look and trie! Thank's for your ultra quickly response, too:-)
I'm printing many doc's to give his "in handy" ( the policy will more
one ;-) I'll trie hard Masters! :-)
Thank's A Lot!
[]'s of seventy round's, Dani:-)
ps: ahamm, what is "pacakges.qa.d.o" ? i'm not understood this
abbreviat
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:44:40PM -0300, Dani wrote:
> Hi! Thank's for your ultra quickly response:-)
>
> For now, I have more one question: I need learn about
> * "Multiple"-binary * in sense of maint-guide. (from one [or two:]
> souce tarball,
> to many binaries.deb)
>
> The maint-guide te
Hi! Thank's for your ultra quickly response:-)
For now, I have more one question: I need learn about
* "Multiple"-binary * in sense of maint-guide. (from one [or two:]
souce tarball,
to many binaries.deb)
The maint-guide teaching me about "single"-binary but nothing
about "multiple" ...
My
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 02:17:01AM -0300, Dani wrote:
> hi! my system is a Debian Testing. I use a Athlon Xp1.7 (x86) and
> I already installed the tools give in "maint-guide". I tried hard _but_
> *all*
> tutorials that I encounter use this estructure:
>
> # apt-get source gcc-X.Y
> # cd gcc-
hi! my system is a Debian Testing. I use a Athlon Xp1.7 (x86) and
I already installed the tools give in "maint-guide". I tried hard _but_ *all*
tutorials that I encounter use this estructure:
# apt-get source gcc-X.Y
# cd gcc-X.Y
# dpkg-buildpackage ( or debuild )
...
But this is _not_ what I
6 matches
Mail list logo
