Re: #281307

2005-01-24 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Pierre Habouzit [Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:06:50 +0100]: > but I think other project that cad DOS flyspray are ill projects, since > "empty" cookie is ok. putting garbage into the cookie is a stupid > behaviour. anyway, you're right. "Be strict in what you emit and liberal in what you accept", a

Re: #281307

2005-01-24 Thread Pierre Habouzit
fact that the problem is not > > flyspray's fault. Should I close the bug ? or let it live with > > wontfix for years ? or should I reassign the problem to privoxy ? > > > > I do not like long-living bugs ;) > > > > > > [1] http://bugs.d

Re: #281307

2005-01-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
r let it live with wontfix for years ? > or should I reassign the problem to privoxy ? > > I do not like long-living bugs ;) > > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281307 > -- > ·O· Pierre Habouzit > ··O > OOO

Re: #281307

2005-01-24 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Lun 24 Janvier 2005 10:27, Matthew Palmer a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:57:47AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > I'm the current flyspray maintainer ... and I should say I don't > > know what to do with that bug [1] > > > > Upstream, and I agree on the fact that the problem is not >

Re: #281307

2005-01-24 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:57:47AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > I'm the current flyspray maintainer ... and I should say I don't know > what to do with that bug [1] > > Upstream, and I agree on the fact that the problem is not flyspray's > fault. Should I close the bug ? or let it live with

#281307

2005-01-24 Thread Pierre Habouzit
privoxy ? I do not like long-living bugs ;) [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281307 -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpcii7gFZyDJ.pgp Description: PGP signature