hi
I have one more question
the package contains an executable file in /usr/bin but its permissions are
set as -rw-r--r-- but it should be -r-x-r-x-r-x
here is a part of my rules file
60 install: build
61 dh_testdir
62 dh_testroot
63 dh_clean -k
64
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Fixes ownership, and some permissions, but not in /usr/bin (see its
> manpage). I guess your build system is somehow missing a chmod +x on the
> generated binary.
>
> Cheers,
> Cyril Brulebois
>
the executable installed has permissions set to +x but the package does
Justin Pryzby-43 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 08:13:22AM -0700, varun_shrivastava wrote:
> You could have libinput0-debug provides:libinput0.
>
> However I still think the best way is to compile with debugging
> symbols and move the symbols to separate files in
Justin Pryzby-43 wrote:
>
>
> Do you mean it adds stuff within a #ifdef to use SDL? Why is it so
> huge?
>
>
>
yes it adds code not so huge under #ifdef SDL_ENABLE ... #endif
Can we provide a virtual package libinput-virtual on which the applications
will depend and the virtual packag
hi
actually the library uses g_log kind of debugging technique ie some #defines
are there, so when log is enabled #defines get replaced by g_log(***), and
when its disabled #defines get replaced by (void)0
But i have a bigger problem thats the library has one more option of
--enable-sdl=yes/no ,
hi
try this
mkdir -p $(CURDIR)/debian//opt/gsi-tools
cp GSITools.pm $(CURDIR)/debian//opt/gsi-tools/
cp GSIManagementService.pl
$(CURDIR)/debian//opt/gsi-tools
bye
varun
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/how-to-just-copy-files-that-don%27t-need-compiled--
hi
i have a library and want to package it
But it has a configuration option as --enable-debug=yes/no
So i need to make 2 packages as
1) libinput0
2) libinput0-debug
So now if an application uses libinput, how the $(shlibs:Depends) variable
get substituted, during application package being bui
hi
Justin Pryzby-43 wrote:
>
>
> packagename.shlibs is what gets installed to /v/l/d/i. shlibs.local
> is an additional thing read by dpkg-shlibdeps for cases when someone
> elses public library package doesn't include packagename.shlibs. In
> this case dpkg wouldn't otherwise be able to fin
Justin Pryzby-43 wrote:
>
> Is this the same package that caused dh_strip errors?
>
No its not.
Justin Pryzby-43 wrote:
>
> You shouldn't set rpath to /usr/lib since it's in the default search
> path.
>
I haven't set the path any where in the rules file. but i am trying to
install it using
hi
i am a newbee in packaging and trying out how to package some already
available source packages
i am trying to pack jpeg62_6b, the package builds successfully but running
lintian shows
"binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/cjpeg /usr/lib"
the message is same for all binaries in /usr/bi
Justin Pryzby-43 wrote:
>
> Well 2 things come to mind. Is scratchbox "install" compatibile with
> debhelper? Also ls -la debian/libfreetype6/DEBIAN
>
>
Removing "dh_strip" builds the package, it shouldn't have build if
scratchbox have incompatible "install"?
ls -la debian/libfreetype6/ dis
Justin Pryzby-43 wrote:
>
>
> Can you set DH_DEBUG like at the head of the rulesfile and rerun?
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
thanks
i added line export DH_DEBUG=1 on top of rules file b
hi
i am trying to build a package using debhelper scripts, but it gives an
error message
dh_installdirs -a
dh_install -a
dh_link -a
dh_compress -a
dh_strip -a
dh_fixperms -a
dh_makeshlibs -plibfreetype6 -V'libfreetype6 (>> 6.3.10)'
dh_shlibdeps -a
dh_installdeb -a
/scratchbox/tools/bin/instal
all other source code (becoz i have made changes to them according
to my requirement) that i have installed using make install, otherwise i
wouldn't be able to make a deb package.
thanks and regards
varun
Raphael Hertzog-3 wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, varun_shrivastava wrote:
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
