Bug#1040701: RFS: awstats/7.8-4 [QA] -- powerful and featureful web server log analyzer

file, to avoid creating the /etc/logrotate.d/httpd-prerotate/awstats.dpkg-new file, and thus requiring user interaction when updating. See #1037213. * debian/awstats.preinst: created. Regards, Lourisvaldo Figueredo Junior signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1025274: RFS: tuxguitar/1.5.6+dfsg1-1 [QA] -- Multitrack guitar tablature editor and player

Em sexta-feira, 9 de dezembro de 2022, às 10:10:32 -03, Helmar Gerloni escreveu: > Right now i only have > amd64 hardware available, so i can't build on other architectures > (cross-compile maybe, but that doesn't sound trivial). I have already had success following these articles: https://wiki.

Bug#1024348: RFS: analog/2:6.0.17-3 -- web server log analyzer

ebian/lang directory. * debian/po/de.po: changed to UTF-8 text encoding. * debian/po/pt_BR.po: changed to UTF-8 text encoding. * debian/po/sv.po: changed to UTF-8 text encoding. * debian/watch: updated. Regards, -- Lourisvaldo Figueredo Junior

Bug#1016720: RFS: analog/2:6.0.17-2 [ITA] -- web server log analyzer

analog (2:6.0.17-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * New maintainer. (Closes: #674866) * debian/control: bumped Std-Ver to 4.6.1. * debian/patches/06_fix-pcre-version.patch: created to make analog work with new version of PCRE. (Closes: #17) Regards, Lourisvaldo Figueredo Jun

Bug#1010394: RFS: analog/2:6.0.17-1 [QA] -- web server log analyzer

~ 02_windows_vista_7.patch removed. No longer needed. ~ 04_reproducible.patch updated. - debian/upstream/metadata: created. - debian/watch: updated. * debian/rules: using SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH variable, instead of parsing the output of dpkg-parsechangelog. Regard

Re: CRLF in upstream source code

> > Why should it matter to anything, including Debian, unless there are > > technical problems caused by that? > > So such as not compiling. Or another reason not yet shared with us. > No problem with building the package. I just saw a comment on a bug and I was in doubt [1]. I decided to ask

CRLF in upstream source code

Hi everyone, I have a doubt. In cases where the upstream uses the MS-DOS pattern CRLF ("\r\n") to end of line, instead Unix pattern LF ("\n"). In this situation, should the maintainer make a patch converting this files to the Unix pattern LF? Or to Debian is 'acceptable' to build a package from

Bug#1005714: RFS: analog/2:6.0-23 [QA] -- web server log analyzer

ian repository [2]. Any tips or suggestions given will be welcome. Regards, -- Lourisvaldo Figueredo Junior [1] https://salsa.debian.org/figueredo/analog [2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/analog signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#1004458: RFS: utf8gen/1.1-4 [QA] -- convert ASCII hexadecimal Unicode code points to UTF-8

estions given will be welcome. Regards, -- Lourisvaldo Figueredo Junior [1] https://salsa.debian.org/figueredo/utf8gen [2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/utf8gen

Bug#1004410: RFS: utfcheck/1.2-3 [QA] -- check validity of UTF-8 and ASCII files

provide CI tests for salsa. * debian/tests/control: updated. * debian/watch: cleaned and using a secure URI. The git repository is on my account[1]. Please, send this to debian repository. Any tips or suggestions given will be welcome. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/figueredo/utfcheck Regards, -- Lourisvaldo Figueredo Junior