ion.
Best regards,
Igor.
>>>>> "Tobias" == Tobias Frost writes:
Tobias> Found another few minutes for the d/copyright review: -
Tobias> doc/Makefile.in is undocumented. - po Translation authors
Tobias> should also be mentioned - m4/* has undocumentd
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ru-tts":
* Package name : ru-tts
Version : 6.2.2-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/ru_tts
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rulex":
* Package name : rulex
Version : 3.8.4-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/rulex
* License
the initial release:
freespeech (1.0m-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1055900)
Regards,
--
Igor B. Poretsky
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multispeech":
* Package name : multispeech
Version : 4.6.2-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/m
in files are autogenerated. How should be they documented
apart from others? And, maybe, some other autogenerated files as well?
Apparently there is something I don't understand clearly here.
Best regards,
Igor.
thanks for your clarification. So, I've updated my uploads on
mentors.debian.net.
Best regards,
Igor.
think that the latter option
is better. Am I right?
Best regards,
Igor.
Tobias> On further iterations, you keep at -1 until this is
Tobias> sponsored.
But some things should be fixed on the upstream level. Of course, I can
do it with Debian patches, but is it a point when I am an upstream
developer myself? How should I act in this situation?
Best regards,
Igor.
nted behaviour of Speech Dispatcher. And I should notify every
running instance regardless of the way it was launched by.
Best regards,
Igor.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multispeech":
* Package name : multispeech
Version : 4.6.0-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/m
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ru-tts":
* Package name : ru-tts
Version : 6.2.0-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/ru_tts
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rulex":
* Package name : rulex
Version : 3.8.0-1
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/rulex
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freespeech":
* Package name : freespeech
Version : 1.0m-21
Upstream contact : Igor B. Poretsky
* URL : https://github.com/poretsky/freespeech
ight
way'... correct me if I'm wrong.
--
Regards,
Igor Filatov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CACTpin4wBcGmaCroFTRDdobd7n3zzba4E6N0Dkk6zC61tD=6...@mail.gmail.com
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-icon-hider"
* Package name: gnome-shell-extension-icon-hider
Version : 10-1
Upstream Author : Igor Kalnitsky
* URL :
https://
03.09.2012 21:53, Arno Töll пишет:
> Hi,
>
> On 03.09.2012 18:55, The Wanderer wrote:
>> I have not been able to find any documentation on these stamp-* targets,
>> although searching has revealed that they or something like them appear
>> to be
>> (or to have been) used in a number of other packa
25.07.2012 12:05, Michael Wild пишет:
> Hi all
>
> How can I reliably (from a user-program) determine the
> multiarch-triplet/quadlet without depending on dpkg-dev? I found some
> talk of a lsb_architecture utility, but so far have found no trace of it...
# gcc -print-multiarch
x86_64-linux-gnu
19.04.2012 12:30, Björn Esser пишет:
> Severity: wishlish
>
> *** UPDATE ***
> New version from svn trunk (544~svn replaces 2.1.0).
> Documentation (html + LaTeX) is now included in build-process.
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libblocxx".
> Ha
17.04.2012 20:46, Nicolas Valcárcel пишет:
> Yes, i got contacted and i +1'd the upload, but i don't work for
> canonical anymore so my e-mail is not that one, so if you can please
> update my e-mail to nvalcar...@gmail.com that'll be great. Also about
> the "-1" remove about naturaldocs you'll nee
16.04.2012 15:37, Ansgar Burchardt пишет:
> Please do so first, for example by asking for the new version in the
> BTS. You can also include your proposed NMU diff if you want to help
> the maintainer. A NMU should only be done if the maintainer is busy and
> cannot react himself.
I'll always c
16.04.2012 13:52, Ansgar Burchardt пишет:
> On 04/16/2012 11:20 AM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
>> dget -x
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/augeas/augeas_0.10.0-0.1.dsc
>>
>> Changes since the last upload:
>>
>> augeas (0.10.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>* Non-maintainer u
It's a troll.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f426f54.4070...@gmail.com
02.12.2011 12:54, Tomasz Muras пишет:
> Hello,
>
> If a package installs cronjob in (say) /etc/cron.daily but administrator
> wants to move that into "weekly" job - would it be OK for him to simply
> move the configuration file from /etc/cron.daily to /etc/cron.weekly? Or
> do you think it may cau
CPL is too short for me, and is not widely known abbreviation, I guess.
I just remember of Control Panel Library :-)
CPL can stand for "Crystallographic Protocol Library" too
Maybe python-eso-cpl, or python-eso.cpl, or python-esocpl.
04.11.2011 13:06, Ole Streicher пишет:
Hi I
I think the name "python-cpl" is not descriptive enough
04.11.2011 00:07, Ole Streicher пишет:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cpl".
* Package name: python-cpl
Version : 0.3.5-1
Upstream Author : Ole Streicher
* URL : http://w
I'm building a package with:
64-bits app (foo),
64-bits lib (libfoo) and
32-bits lib (lib32foo).
foo is linked with libfoo, but dependency in DEBIAN/control
is set to li32foo.
What's the matter?
dpkg 1.16.1
DH 8.9.8
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
13.09.2011 18:35, Marc Haber пишет:
>> gentoo - Fully GUI-configurable, two-pane X file manager
>
> I would strongly suggest choosing a different name, due to the
> identically named Linux distribution.
Gentoo is used as an example in Debian maintainer's guide :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
06.09.2011 00:44, kuLa пишет:
> Hi all,
> I have simple app in php and would like to package it. Source is in git
> (2 branches; upstream and debian, gbp.conf is pointing into these branches).
> I used dh_make to debianised package, relevant packages has been edited.
> When running git buildpackage
Thank you David!
I was blind: build-arch <-> binary-arch :-)
> Oh, and for next upload please add Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git headers
Is it ok to use github or whatsoever for this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
03.09.2011 19:22, David Bremner пишет:
> On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:34:23 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote:
> Other architectures will be built on the autobuilder network, all going
> well. For the second question, it depends how long the package takes to
> pass through NEW. It is usually pretty
Greate! Thank you.
OA is uploaded to FTP.
What about other architectures (i386, alpha, powerpc, etc)?
Do I need another sponsor? :-)
How much time does it take for package to appear in repo?
03.09.2011 16:37, David Bremner пишет:
> On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:07:39 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote:
&
I have upload new version without
"./contrib" and "./src/include/xpm.h".
The latter is going to be removed in upstream,
that file is from very old Axiom version.
"./contrib" is not used now and has unclear license mess:
"./contrib/texmacs/COPYING" says about GPL-3,
but sources are BSDL or GPL (1
30.08.2011 16:03, David Bremner пишет:
> On startup, I get
>
>(HyperDoc) read_ht_db: No ht.db file found.
>
> before the rest of the startup messages.
>
> Weirdly, the basic help commands I tried seemed to work, but I don't
> really know what to expect.
I saw this message after making sym
> - The second paragraph of the long description is not helpful to the
> debian user trying to decide whether to install the package; we try
> not to waste space in the description because it is stored in many
> places (e.g. /var/lib/dpkg/available). You are welcome to add a
> README.Debia
28.08.2011 19:00, David Bremner пишет:
> I'm not sure if open-axiom uses this feature (and I notice sbcl itself
> also has broken #! lines in it's fasl files. In your case, I suspect the
> upstream build process is putting the wrong path into the #!
> lines. interpsys isn't installed by debian sbcl
that
> social usually, as i like peace when working and thinking, and there are even
> no Debian developers in my country (Estonia)
:-) I wouldn't say that, you are being social but just in different
ways like writing this mail for example, or by producing free
software. I hope my expla
ot be perfect, but I hope to get
the necessary assistance here ;-)
--
With kind regards
Igor Boehm
+--+--+
| Igor Boehm, |.''`. |
| IT Student and Debian user, | : :' :
ot be perfect, but I hope to get
the necessary assistance here ;-)
--
With kind regards
Igor Boehm
+--+--+
| Igor Boehm, |.''`. |
| IT Student and Debian user, | : :' :
Some time around Thu, 17 Sep 1998 00:57:27 EDT,
Brian Almeida wrote:
>
> --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 1998 at 12:49:53AM -0400, Shaleh wrote:
> > Igor
it?)
This is not necessary but benefits you, the developer. You can compile with
debugging symbols, and in case you need to debug, you wouldn't have to
recompile. However, in the binary-arch target you need to strip the binaries.
Debstd does this automatically IIRC and there must be dh_strip i
ctions on applying for
developer status, see developers-reference which is available at
http://www.debian.org/developers_corner.html and in developers-reference.deb
--
Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation
Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
case, you have to assume
that the user configured ppp already and/or do what you are already do: warn
the user that the package won't work without ppp being properly configured.
--
Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation
Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROT
bian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation
Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e author will not accept your patches
for whatever reason, it is better to do it in the debian/rules file.
Sometimes, it's just an easier way out ;-).
Hope this answers your questions.
--
Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation
Igor Grobman [E
situation
Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I prefer to do it all myself without
using the helper tools.
--
Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation
Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but you do have to understand most of it in order to be proficient, IMO.
--
Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation
Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ething, you need to add Replaces: there.
> and will
> something-else be happy with it?
Yes.
--
Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation
Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at is the case,
> then perhaps the outline in /usr/doc/debmake/HOWTO.first_time applies
> to the "by hand" method as well. If not, then I would love to see
> such an outline.
Take a look at
http://www.pics.com/~igor/debian/programmer.html/ch-tools.html#s2.2
--
Proudly running
am not sure of the reasoning behind this, but this is
how dpkg always spits it out.
>
>
> 8. Why is build complaining about "no utmp entry available"?
>
>When I build, I am told:
>
> no utmp entry available, using value of LOGNAME ("kirk") at
> Ah, thanks you. I'll stick the source in Incoming. Have I to do something to
> get it out of non-free?
Yes, file a bug against ftp.debian.org
--
Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation
Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to main, or reupload your package including the source.
--
Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation
Igor Grobman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
53 matches
Mail list logo
