At Sat, 13 Jan 2001 00:31:55 +0100 (CET), Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please explain which work was impossible for you because you aren't
>a
>developer until now? Do you have a personal problem with my sponsorship
>for your packages or what other work is impossible for you without a
>D
At Sat, 13 Jan 2001 00:31:55 +0100 (CET), Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please explain which work was impossible for you because you aren't
>a
>developer until now? Do you have a personal problem with my sponsorship
>for your packages or what other work is impossible for you without a
>
At Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:36:50 -0600, "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:54:31PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
>You want to start a flamewar before you are a dd? Thats neat, but I
>don't take it.
>
>> PS: Bah, what is a year of waiting in a human
At Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:36:50 -0600, "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:54:31PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
>You want to start a flamewar before you are a dd? Thats neat, but I
>don't take it.
>
>> PS: Bah, what is a year of waiting in a human
I've been reading archives of debian-new-maintainer and debian-mentor, and
I'm somewhat confused about which older GPG keys have problems. If I have
a key
~/Program_Source $ gpg --list-keys "David Starner"
pub 1024D/C3E943FF 2000-04-18 David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sub 1024g/39C9DE01 2000-
I've been reading archives of debian-new-maintainer and debian-mentor, and
I'm somewhat confused about which older GPG keys have problems. If I have
a key
~/Program_Source $ gpg --list-keys "David Starner"
pub 1024D/C3E943FF 2000-04-18 David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sub 1024g/39C9DE01 2000
6 matches
Mail list logo