On Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:06:06 -0700, Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 22:42 + 1999-09-15, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
>>Is that CVS repository available to non-developers?
>
>% cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 13 Sep 1999 18:50:25 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zygo Blaxell) writes:
>> Are the FTP archive maintenance scripts debian-packaged?
>
>No. The main one is called 'dinstall' -- it is in CVS I think but
>no-one has packaged
On 12 Sep 1999 17:06:57 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Gopal Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Maybe this is FAQ. I don't have a potato machine handy where I
>> work. In general, if developers want to try installing packages they
>> made for "unstable" to check if it instal
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 23:39:37 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:33:42PM +0000, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
>> I've noticed that when I build a Debian package, I get a filename for
>> the arch-specific parts of the package named something li
I've noticed that when I build a Debian package, I get a filename for
the arch-specific parts of the package named something like
"hello_1.3-14.3_i386.deb". However, in the Debian FTP archive, the
same package is named "hello_1.3-14.3.deb" (with no "_i386").
Why is this? Are package files normal
5 matches
Mail list logo
