> That said, good luck with your package.
Thanks for helping me.
Wolfgang
> You should contact them. Also, please understand one thing about diversions:
> once you add one, you must keep the code to *remove* it around. Even if stop
> doing a diversion, you will need to move the code to remove it from the *rm
> scripts to the postinst script (to remove it on upgrades from
> That said, good luck with your package.
Thanks for helping me.
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> You should contact them. Also, please understand one thing about diversions:
> once you add one, you must keep the code to *remove* it around. Even if stop
> doing a diversion, you will need to move the code to remove it from the *rm
> scripts to the postinst script (to remove it on upgrades fro
> Wouldn't it be a lot nicer to just add a "fax" entry to /etc/printcap?
> I know that at least lprng can handle printing to pipes (I use it to
> `print' mp3's to mpg123).
I have already thought about that. But the problem is that this fax
entry is supposed to spawn a graphical utility (requiring
> Wouldn't it be a lot nicer to just add a "fax" entry to /etc/printcap?
> I know that at least lprng can handle printing to pipes (I use it to
> `print' mp3's to mpg123).
I have already thought about that. But the problem is that this fax
entry is supposed to spawn a graphical utility (requirin
Hi,
I am currently packaging gfax. In the Debian Policy it is specified
that one, willing to divert an executable, should contact the original
executable's maintainer.
In my case the lpr provided by gfax is a wrapper to provide the lpr
-Pfax command line. Should I contact both the LPRng and BSD
Hi,
I am currently packaging gfax. In the Debian Policy it is specified
that one, willing to divert an executable, should contact the original
executable's maintainer.
In my case the lpr provided by gfax is a wrapper to provide the lpr
-Pfax command line. Should I contact both the LPRng and BSD
> "Filip" == Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suspect this is probably just a problem with the way libtool gets called
> (either incorrect or incomplete), but I'm not too good on reading
> Makefile.in's and apparently (to make things even more complicated) the
> libtool isn'
> "Filip" == Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suspect this is probably just a problem with the way libtool gets called
> (either incorrect or incomplete), but I'm not too good on reading
> Makefile.in's and apparently (to make things even more complicated) the
> libtool isn
> Welcome !
Thanks to you and to everyone who answered my questions. Once the mail
got through the arcane of the Internet I got quick replies.
> There is no fooling, this is exactly what you should do. Debian
> native packages are for instance the debian package tools. In almost
> all situations
Hi,
I am the author of the GNU HaliFAX viewer and I have pre-packaged it
for Debian GNU/Linux. I have been a maintainer since Saturday and
although my packaging seemed correct to my applicant manager I still
have a few questions for which I have no answer.
In http://www.debian.org/doc/developers
Hi,
I am the author of the GNU HaliFAX viewer and I have pre-packaged it
for Debian GNU/Linux. I have been a maintainer since Saturday and
although my packaging seemed correct to my applicant manager I still
have a few questions for which I have no answer.
In http://www.debian.org/doc/developers
> Welcome !
Thanks to you and to everyone who answered my questions. Once the mail
got through the arcane of the Internet I got quick replies.
> There is no fooling, this is exactly what you should do. Debian
> native packages are for instance the debian package tools. In almost
> all situations
Hi,
I am the author of the GNU HaliFAX viewer and I have pre-packaged it
for Debian GNU/Linux. I have been a maintainer since Saturday and
although my packaging seemed correct to my applicant manager I still
have a few questions for which I have no answer.
In http://www.debian.org/doc/developer
Hi,
I am the author of the GNU HaliFAX viewer and I have pre-packaged it
for Debian GNU/Linux. I have been a maintainer since Saturday and
although my packaging seemed correct to my applicant manager I still
have a few questions for which I have no answer.
In http://www.debian.org/doc/developer
16 matches
Mail list logo
