Re: uswsusp package

2011-03-14 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Rodolfo kix Garcia schreef op za 12-03-2011 om 00:49 [+0100]: > On 03/12/11 00:31, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Am 12.03.2011 00:15, schrieb Rodolfo kix Garcia: > > > >> Dear mentors, > >> > >> this week suspend-utils 1.0 was released. Now includes support for KMS > >> systems. > I am updating th

Re: RFS: muswsusp [userspace software suspend], liblzf-dev

2006-06-25 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:16:04 +0200 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need a sponsor for two packages: muswsusp and liblzf. The former > > contains the binaries you need to use the new software suspend > > fac

RFS: muswsusp [userspace software suspend], liblzf-dev

2006-06-24 Thread Tim Dijkstra
compiled in the binaries that go on the an initramfs. I've put the packages, source, diffs, etc at: http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/muswsusp http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/liblzf Thanks in advance, Tim Dijkstra signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Build-depend on source of a debian package

2006-06-24 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:31:35 +0200 Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > A debian package I'm making has as part of its source a (almost) > > verbatim copy of the source of a package that is already in debian. > > It works perfectly l

Build-depend on source of a debian package

2006-06-23 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi all, [ please CC, I'm not in this list ] A debian package I'm making has as part of its source a (almost) verbatim copy of the source of a package that is already in debian. It works perfectly like this and it's only 916K, but it feels a bit of a waste to include it in the source package. I ca

RFS: digitaldj

2004-07-09 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, I'm the current maintainer of digitaldj and I've packaged the new upstream version. My former sponsor was to busy, so maybe somebody else can upload it for me. You'll find it at http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/digitaldj/ version 0.7.5 is the latest. grts Tim

RFS: digitaldj

2004-07-09 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, I'm the current maintainer of digitaldj and I've packaged the new upstream version. My former sponsor was to busy, so maybe somebody else can upload it for me. You'll find it at http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/digitaldj/ version 0.7.5 is the latest. grts Tim -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:43:16 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:32:17AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Much better, but one more nit: > > > > > > &

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:43:16 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:32:17AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Much better, but one more nit: > > > > > > &

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:51:00 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:55:00PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > You can find at: > > > > http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/ > > Much better, but one more nit: >

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-16 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:51:00 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:55:00PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > You can find at: > > > > http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/ > > Much better, but one more nit: >

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:54:48 +0200 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There was an NMU by Martin A. Godisch since the last time the > > package was uploaded. Your new pa

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:54:48 +0200 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There was an NMU by Martin A. Godisch since the last time the > > package was uploaded. Your new pa

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > There was an NMU by Martin A. Godisch since the last time the package > was uploaded. Your new package erases that upload from t

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > There was an NMU by Martin A. Godisch since the last time the package > was uploaded. Your new package erases that upload from t

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had > > time for debian packaging for a while. Bu

Re: [RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-15 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:08:26 -0400 Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > > I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had > > time for debian packaging for a while. Bu

[RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-14 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had time for debian packaging for a while. But lately I have, I also had my key signed by a DD (2 days ago) so that's also sorted out. Not being a DD yet, I can't upload it myself, but I have prepared a package for the newest d

[RFS]: digitaldj

2003-09-14 Thread Tim Dijkstra
Hi, I have ITA'd digitaldj already a long time ago. Sadly, I haven't had time for debian packaging for a while. But lately I have, I also had my key signed by a DD (2 days ago) so that's also sorted out. Not being a DD yet, I can't upload it myself, but I have prepared a package for the newest d