Re: Depends: on package in contrib

snd-gui? > I think the second suggestion is by far the better. That means you don't have to depend on a package in contrib, and can add other gui modules later without having to change the dependencies on snd Cheers, -Thom -- Thom May -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Personally, I quite

Re: General question about maintaining a package

* Matthew Twomey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Must all packages be maintained primarily in i386 format? I have a SPARC > platform and was considering the idea of contributing to Debian through > package management. Would I need to set up an i386 based system in > addition to my Debian SPARC? > no

Re: General question about maintaining a package

* Matthew Twomey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Must all packages be maintained primarily in i386 format? I have a SPARC > platform and was considering the idea of contributing to Debian through > package management. Would I need to set up an i386 based system in > addition to my Debian SPARC? > n

Re: Question on Sections:

* Patrick Patterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Monday 25 March 2002 11:57, Thom May wrote: > > people.debian.org/~asuffield/cim > > Hi Thom: > > I thought that the Crypto-In-Main stuff was only for existing packages, and > that any new packages were still supposed

Re: Question on Sections:

people.debian.org/~asuffield/cim :-) -Thom * Patrick Patterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Hi All: > > Sorry if this is a blatantly obvious question to some of you, but I hunted > through the Debian Policy guide and couldn't come up with a clear answer: > > When creating a new package, and as

Re: Question on Sections:

* Patrick Patterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Monday 25 March 2002 11:57, Thom May wrote: > > people.debian.org/~asuffield/cim > > Hi Thom: > > I thought that the Crypto-In-Main stuff was only for existing packages, and > that any new packages were still supposed

Re: Question on Sections:

people.debian.org/~asuffield/cim :-) -Thom * Patrick Patterson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Hi All: > > Sorry if this is a blatantly obvious question to some of you, but I hunted > through the Debian Policy guide and couldn't come up with a clear answer: > > When creating a new package, and a

Re: ssldump package, key signed, what now?

* nicholas black ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > hi there. i've rolled eric rescorla's ssldump utility (version 0.9b2) > into a deb. after using it for a time in our office, i've decided to > submit it here. > > you may find the deb at > http://gtf.org/~dank/ssldump/ssldump_0.9b2-1_i386.deb > > m

Re: ssldump package, key signed, what now?

* nicholas black ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > hi there. i've rolled eric rescorla's ssldump utility (version 0.9b2) > into a deb. after using it for a time in our office, i've decided to > submit it here. > > you may find the deb at > http://gtf.org/~dank/ssldump/ssldump_0.9b2-1_i386.deb > >

Re: Where to put GPG public key

I usually use germany.keyserver.net as that seems to be a lot more reliable than pgp.net Just make sure that your DAM knows where your key is. Cheers, -Thom * Christian Bruun ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > Hey > > The "Applicant's Checklist" step 2 > (http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step2) t

Re: Where to put GPG public key

I usually use germany.keyserver.net as that seems to be a lot more reliable than pgp.net Just make sure that your DAM knows where your key is. Cheers, -Thom * Christian Bruun ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > Hey > > The "Applicant's Checklist" step 2 > (http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step2)