Patrick Winnertz wrote:
Okay, here are several things to fix:
[...]
Thanks, I have addressed them all.
Source package:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ccontrol/ccontrol_0.9.1+20071204-2.dsc
Change history: http://tedp.id.au/gitweb/?p=ccontrol-debian.git;a=shortlog
--
\0
--
To
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.1+20071204-1
of my package "ccontrol". My previous sponsor (Amaya) is currently AFK.
It builds this binary package:
ccontrol - Compilation controller
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix bug 447832.
The package can be
Hello mentors!
I have a new ccontrol package ready for upload. Once again it is a minor
change from the last version:
* Force-disable GCC stack protection as it is incompatible with the
current dietlibc (Ubuntu #109157).
* Don't ignore errors in $(MAKE) distclean.
The first change will
Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:27:25PM +1000, Ted Percival wrote:
I have prepared a package of fetchexc, a program for retrieving email from
Microsoft Exchange servers. I am seeking comments on the packaging.
>
Which exchange versions? I think exch5 and exch2k have differ
I have prepared a package of fetchexc, a program for retrieving email
from Microsoft Exchange servers. I am seeking comments on the packaging.
I am not seeking sponsorship at the moment - Amaya showed some interest
in sponsoring the package a while ago.
I have posted to the pkg-java-maintainer
kes sense... will do. Do I need to delete the package from
> mentors.debian.net and then re-upload it or just change the description
> before a sponsor accepts it?
>
> Martin
>
> Ted Percival wrote:
>> Martin Kelly wrote:
>>> It builds these binary packages:
>&
Martin Kelly wrote:
> It builds these binary packages:
> pyecm - Factors large numbers (<= 50 digits) using ECM (Elliptic Curve
> Method)
I suggest changing the short description to:
Factors large numbers (up to 50 digits) using the Elliptic Curve
Method (ECM)
And possibly even leaving off t
Martin Kelly wrote:
> After trying to build my package (pyecm), I recieved the following error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop/pyecm-0.1$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
> parsechangelog/debian: error: badly formatted trailer line, at file
> debian/changelog line 5
> dpkg-buildpackage: unable to det
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am packaging a software which includes tests to check if the binary is
> fully funcionnal. However, those tests are much more processor intensive
> than the compilation itself. Is there a general policy about what to do
> with them? Is it enough to run them when testing th
sc
I'm happy to receive any feedback on how the package can be improved,
and if it is good enough, to have it uploaded.
Cheers,
-Ted Percival
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Frederic Lehobey wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my source package "qrfcview".
>
> The package is linda and lintian clean and compiles with pbuilder.
Lintian 1.23.22 has a warning, the solution is simple - take out the
libqt4-{gui,core} entries from the Depends line and allow shlibs:Depen
ources.list contains:
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Thanks for your consideration.
-Ted Percival
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ted Percival wrote:
> I've just uploaded version 1.10-2 of fetchexc which uses dpatch to patch
> the build.xml file rather than doing it directly through the .diff.gz,
> and also adds upstream's changelog.gz which I generated from the
> upstream website (aka the README.ht
I've just uploaded version 1.10-2 of fetchexc which uses dpatch to patch
the build.xml file rather than doing it directly through the .diff.gz,
and also adds upstream's changelog.gz which I generated from the
upstream website (aka the README.html file in the package).
I seem to remember seeing som
st contains:
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Thanks for your consideration.
-Ted Percival
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I guess the package name should be 'liblttoolbox1' or similar (no
separator between package name and major soname version).
I'm a packaging newbie so could well be wrong about this.
-Ted
Francis Tyers wrote:
> There is one
> warning from lintian that I can't quite figure out how to fix. "W:
>
Here are two users' checklists that I have used for reference.
http://people.debian.org/~neilm/sponsorship.html
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/sponsorship_checklist.html
-Ted
Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> I wonder, whether there is a list of these "common gotchas" in packaging
> somewhere, or a c
Paul Wise wrote:
> * debian/changelog: the version should be 0.0.20051212 or
> 0.0.0.20051212 or something so that if upstream changes their
> version scheme, you won't have to use [an] epoch.
Isn't that exactly what the epoch is for?
-T
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Ek Zindagoi wrote:
> I would like to build rpms on a debian system for use on a redhat
> system. Can I do that on a debian system ?
>
> Even if I wanted to install the RPM on a debain system, can I run the
> rpmbuild -bb command on a debian system and successfully build an RPM
You can certainly
19 matches
Mail list logo
