did) the fix in svn, and only an upload is
needed. I will do so in two weeks once i come back to my gpg key if nobody
does this before.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
behaviour in future versions
> of apt? The expected behaviour for it should be to choose the greater
> version if several version of a single package provide a virtual
> package.
No, but now is the time to fix this, at the start of the release cycle, so
maybe we should fill an impo
> The bug is fixed in the CVS repository, 3.08 bug-fix branch.
>
> - Xavier Leroy
> ---
So, can someone grab the patch from the bugfix branch and apply it to the
debian package ? I would do it but i am far from my ssh/gpg keys for another
two weeks.
Friendly,
Sven Lu
situations like this:
>
> Build-Depends: ocaml-native-compilers [!m68k !mips !mipsel !s390],
> ocaml [m68k mips mipsel s390]
Notice that this kind of things is mentioned in the ocaml-packaging-policy,
did you read it ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
des which is non deterministic and
> strongly discouraged.
>
> As I said in the past this needs a real metapackage that then depends
> on the actual ocaml package.
We don have this problem, as for both ocaml- and
ocaml-best-pacackages, there is only one real pasckage providing thos
Notice that i mentioned this to elmo and aj in oslo already, during
debconf'03. elmo was not so interested, but aj mentioned it was a reasonable
use of virtual packages.
And to stefano, the problem was mostly with the autobuilders logic being too
broken to handle virtual packages correctly an
any brokeness in dpkg and co to make this move
more smoothly, if needed.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
situations like this:
>
> Build-Depends: ocaml-native-compilers [!m68k !mips !mipsel !s390],
>ocaml [m68k mips mipsel s390]
Bah, you just need to build-depends on : ocaml-best-compilers, and it does the
necessary magic for you. ocaml-best-compilers is provided by o
is using linux with a set
of surveillance cameras. I think they use the vloopback device to have more
than one app access the video device, namely motion and then vlc for video
streaming server.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
is using linux with a set
of surveillance cameras. I think they use the vloopback device to have more
than one app access the video device, namely motion and then vlc for video
streaming server.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or once again offering to help me with an upload.
BTW, what is the deal with motion and 2.6 kernels ? I am under the
understanding that it requires the videoloop or whatever module, which is not
only abandoned upstream, but also not yet ported to 2.6 kernels.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
or once again offering to help me with an upload.
BTW, what is the deal with motion and 2.6 kernels ? I am under the
understanding that it requires the videoloop or whatever module, which is not
only abandoned upstream, but also not yet ported to 2.6 kernels.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nd
that this be a release criteria for sarge+1 ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
nd
that this be a release criteria for sarge+1 ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ave the full
> support of the upstream authors, and have myself contributed to the
> upstream development of mpc and mpd.
BTW, how does it compare to quark, which also has the same client/server
design, and which i package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ave the full
> support of the upstream authors, and have myself contributed to the
> upstream development of mpc and mpd.
BTW, how does it compare to quark, which also has the same client/server
design, and which i package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
hat didn't
> work well.
Build it in a pbuilder, and add everything it is missing.
Or alternatively in a clean chroot, is actually faster. look at the
debootstrap manpage for info on how to build one.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hat didn't
> work well.
Build it in a pbuilder, and add everything it is missing.
Or alternatively in a clean chroot, is actually faster. look at the
debootstrap manpage for info on how to build one.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:20:10AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yeah, seems reasonable, now i only need to find out how to call it
> > from perl.
>
> %arch = split /[=\n]/, qx(dpkg-architecture) or die q(dpkg-architecture
>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:20:10AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yeah, seems reasonable, now i only need to find out how to call it
> > from perl.
>
> %arch = split /[=\n]/, qx(dpkg-architecture) or die q(dpkg-architecture failed);
s is available when using debootstrap, since it is
needed in base-install on debian-installer.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
fered way of doing this ?
Thanks for your help.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
s is available when using debootstrap, since it is
needed in base-install on debian-installer.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fered way of doing this ?
Thanks for your help.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:48:41AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:23:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:44:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > We
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:45:41AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I choose fr_FR.UTF8 or something such in gnome GDM.
>
> And it IS just like that in your /etc/locale.gen as well? fr_FR only won't
> do.
I have man
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:48:41AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:23:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:44:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > We
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:45:41AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I choose fr_FR.UTF8 or something such in gnome GDM.
>
> And it IS just like that in your /etc/locale.gen as well? fr_FR only won't
> do.
I have man
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:44:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > &g
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:44:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > &g
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Depends how practical that is, I guess. For example, it's still unknown
> &
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Depends how practical that is, I guess. For example, it's still unknown
> &
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:07:59AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > Of course, UTF-8 whereever possible is a nice goal to strive after,
> >
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:07:59AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > Of course, UTF-8 whereever possible is a nice goal to strive after,
> >
ce of debian
supports it, and make it a release goal ? I doubt it is still time for
sarge, but maybe for sarge+1 ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ce of debian
supports it, and make it a release goal ? I doubt it is still time for
sarge, but maybe for sarge+1 ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tor &
gnome-randr-applet). When gnome is launching, there are little icons in
the splash screen, and one of the applets (hardware-monitor) doesn't
show a little icon, only the small gnome foot used for icon-less
applets.
Any idea on how to add such a gnome splash screen icon ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
tor &
gnome-randr-applet). When gnome is launching, there are little icons in
the splash screen, and one of the applets (hardware-monitor) doesn't
show a little icon, only the small gnome foot used for icon-less
applets.
Any idea on how to add such a gnome splash screen icon ?
Friendly,
this discussion will be void.
I have really came to know him only since the oldenburg meeting a bit
less than a month ago, but i guess he would be no worse than our average
DD, and he has sure done more work in this last month that our average
DD does, especially on the debian-installer work.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
this discussion will be void.
I have really came to know him only since the oldenburg meeting a bit
less than a month ago, but i guess he would be no worse than our average
DD, and he has sure done more work in this last month that our average
DD does, especially on the debian-installer work.
F
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:26:42PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:59:43PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I have some code that was using :
> >
> > printf (__func__ "Message", ...);
> >
> > This doesn't build a
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:26:42PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:59:43PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I have some code that was using :
> >
> > printf (__func__ "Message", ...);
> >
> > This doesn't build a
ntf ("%sMessage", __func__, ...);
Works, but seems a bit ugly, and there are _lots_ of those lines.
Is there a compiler switch to consider __func__ as string literal or
something such ?
Naturally, using 2.95 kinda works, but i don't think this is a good
idea.
Thanks for your help.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ntf ("%sMessage", __func__, ...);
Works, but seems a bit ugly, and there are _lots_ of those lines.
Is there a compiler switch to consider __func__ as string literal or
something such ?
Naturally, using 2.95 kinda works, but i don't think this is a good
idea.
Thanks for your help.
F
tions anyway, but some of you still seem to need/use it ;)
BTW, the attachement is of md5sum b09e26c292759d654633d3c8ed00d18d.
Anyone know of an easy way to filter out emails where a given
attachement has a particular md5sum ? My tries with uudeview, grep, sed
and med5sum where not that much of a success.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
tions anyway, but some of you still seem to need/use it ;)
BTW, the attachement is of md5sum b09e26c292759d654633d3c8ed00d18d.
Anyone know of an easy way to filter out emails where a given
attachement has a particular md5sum ? My tries with uudeview, grep, sed
and med5sum where not that much of
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:45:37PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:37:40AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Adam Kessel wrote:
> > > > I've written a fairly simple com
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:45:37PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:37:40AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Adam Kessel wrote:
> > > > I've written a fairly simple com
to 8-9000 packages should scale the same way up to 30K or
> 40K packages?
You are aware that some mirror are already on the very limit of not
having enough place on their 100Go partition for the debian archives and
were asking for near term solutions.
That said, a small (arch: all probably) script should probably not even
be visible in the archive.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
aylist file, or hand append files, but that's it. It also
doesn't die when you relaunch the X server, which is rather nice when
doing X driver work :)))
It also is a true C application, and not a bunches of script. It uses
libxine for playing sounds.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
to 8-9000 packages should scale the same way up to 30K or
> 40K packages?
You are aware that some mirror are already on the very limit of not
having enough place on their 100Go partition for the debian archives and
were asking for near term solutions.
That said, a small (arch: all probably)
aylist file, or hand append files, but that's it. It also
doesn't die when you relaunch the X server, which is rather nice when
doing X driver work :)))
It also is a true C application, and not a bunches of script. It uses
libxine for playing sounds.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 08:57:36AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> On Aug 30, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > > On Aug 29, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > I have a package that
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I have a package that installs a xemacs specific .el file, which
> > naturally don't build with the emacs20 package i have installed.
> >
> > I
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 08:57:36AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> On Aug 30, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > > On Aug 29, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > I have a package that
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> On Aug 29, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I have a package that installs a xemacs specific .el file, which
> > naturally don't build with the emacs20 package i have installed.
> >
> > I
Hello,
I have a package that installs a xemacs specific .el file, which
naturally don't build with the emacs20 package i have installed.
Is there a way of specifying that only xemacs installs should build a
given .el or something such ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hello,
I have a package that installs a xemacs specific .el file, which
naturally don't build with the emacs20 package i have installed.
Is there a way of specifying that only xemacs installs should build a
given .el or something such ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
compiler suite,
which is then used to rebuild everything.
I believe that maybe smlnj has some similar mechanism, maybe you should
ask upstream about this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
compiler suite,
which is then used to rebuild everything.
I believe that maybe smlnj has some similar mechanism, maybe you should
ask upstream about this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oblematix packages ? Would a apt-cache rdepends be
> > enough for this :
>
> I think that would be enough.
> It would be obvious after the new package is installed, because they
> will be uninstallable in unstable.
Ok.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
oblematix packages ? Would a apt-cache rdepends be
> > enough for this :
>
> I think that would be enough.
> It would be obvious after the new package is installed, because they
> will be uninstallable in unstable.
Ok.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
guide/
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
Ok, thanks.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
> > maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
>
> > Now,
guide/
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
Ok, thanks.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ading the Policy document, but it doesn't say much about
this, is there another reference document speaking about shared lib
soname ?)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:10:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 08:53:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I am currently preparing a NMU for libgtop2, which is broken and whose
> > maintainer told me has no time to fix right now.
>
> > Now,
ading the Policy document, but it doesn't say much about
this, is there another reference document speaking about shared lib
soname ?)
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or how someone who is "all" can
> > get access.
>
> all = all debian developers and perhaps special cases (don't know).
>
> Take a look at http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/
But i guess at least a signed key is needed.
I suppose that you would need to contact debian-admin for this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
or how someone who is "all" can
> > get access.
>
> all = all debian developers and perhaps special cases (don't know).
>
> Take a look at http://www.testdrive.compaq.com/
But i guess at least a signed key is needed.
I suppose that you would need to contact
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:22:37PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 09:29, Sven Luther wrote:
> > You can get the mail adress of the autobuild maintainers from :
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/people
>
> Sorry if this seems dumb, but I can&
uild, i think, so maybe
it is an override thingy and needs you to contact the ftp-masters.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
gnol
tambien.
Amigablemente,
Sven Luther
gnol
tambien.
Amigablemente,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the right place for this ? I don't
think debian-mentors is indicated.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
the right place for this ? I don't
think debian-mentors is indicated.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:)))
(but then, this is biased advice, i am the ocaml maintainer after all).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
:)))
(but then, this is biased advice, i am the ocaml maintainer after all).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; When reassigning the bug to dpkg-dev, Branden has said that he would
> eventually
> split up the xlibs package [0], so this would go away when rebuilding against
> some future xlibs.
Or you could try a shlibs override. look at dpkg-shlibsdep manpage for
more details.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
gt; When reassigning the bug to dpkg-dev, Branden has said that he would eventually
> split up the xlibs package [0], so this would go away when rebuilding against
> some future xlibs.
Or you could try a shlibs override. look at dpkg-shlibsdep manpage for
more details.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ally the recommended way to do this? Can I call
> dpkg --list from a postinst script without having it explode?
No, it is not. You just need to use the $1 argument to postinst, as
Jerome told you.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ally the recommended way to do this? Can I call
> dpkg --list from a postinst script without having it explode?
No, it is not. You just need to use the $1 argument to postinst, as
Jerome told you.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
or a sgml one) in
the source package, and generate the docs yourself.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:15:11PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:42:21PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:17:13PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> Is there a right way for using the source of a different
> >> debian
or a sgml one) in
the source package, and generate the docs yourself.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:15:11PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:42:21PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:17:13PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> Is there a right way for using the source of a different
> >> debian
ll, why don't you simply do a package with a copy of the exim sources,
and add the patch in the .diff.gz. This way you upload the source just
once, and upload new .diff.gz each time there is a new version of the
patches ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ll, why don't you simply do a package with a copy of the exim sources,
and add the patch in the .diff.gz. This way you upload the source just
once, and upload new .diff.gz each time there is a new version of the
patches ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
other binary packages provided
by the source package get build fine.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
other binary packages provided
by the source package get build fine.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:58:11PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
> > that :
> >
> > $ lintian ocaml-base-
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:58:11PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
> > that :
> >
> > $ lintian ocaml-base-
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2003-02-12 at 09:44, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > I just uploaded a new version of my lablgl package yesterday, and all
> > autobuilder failed with :
> >
> > ocamlmktop -I . -I +lablt
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2003-02-12 at 09:44, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > I just uploaded a new version of my lablgl package yesterday, and all
> > autobuilder failed with :
> >
> > ocamlmktop -I . -I +lablt
led on the autobuilders at the time of the build, and the
buildd logs didn't give me much more info.
Any help would be welcome.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
led on the autobuilders at the time of the build, and the
buildd logs didn't give me much more info.
Any help would be welcome.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e correct way to handle this, would be to associate a
priority or something such to each provide ? having the real package be
priority 50 for example, and other package able to provide virtual
packages with other priorities, be them higher or lower.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
e correct way to handle this, would be to associate a
priority or something such to each provide ? having the real package be
priority 50 for example, and other package able to provide virtual
packages with other priorities, be them higher or lower.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
