Re: Bug#1106818: RFS: keyd/2.5.0-5 -- keyboard key remapping daemon

2025-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 05:53:09AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: Hi, > You may wish to release '2.5.0-5~exp1' that will allow you later to release' > 2.5.0-5' to 'unstable'. What would be the potential benefit of doing that? As far as I know Debian revision bumps do not incur any cost, and as l

Re: Should I place an icon in /usr/share/pixmaps?

2024-11-05 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 11:34:58AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: Hi, > My question is, does anything still use /usr/share/pixmaps/ instead of > looking > in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/? If not, I would like to remove > the > /usr/share/pixmaps, but I don’t want to do so if it will

Bug#971634: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.5-1 -- automate btrfs maintenance tasks on mountpoints or directories

2020-10-05 Thread Sven Hoexter
Hi Nicholas, I will take a look at the package. Sven

Bug#935390: RFS: vnstat/2.4-1 [NMU] [ITA]

2019-09-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:23:06AM -0700, Rob Savoury wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vnstat/vnstat_2.4-0.1.dsc Hey Rob and Christian, the package looks good to me. I've uploaded it to delayed-3 in case Christian objects the uplo

Bug#935390: RFS: vnstat/2.4-1 [NMU] [ITA]

2019-08-22 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 01:26:35AM -0700, Rob Savoury wrote: Hey Rob, > Changes since the last upload: > >* New upstream version 2.4 > . >* debian/patches/ >+ drop patch applied upstream (timeout for restart) >+ modify pidfile and systemd patches for new source files >

Bug#932843: RFS: vnstat/1.18-2.1 [NMU]

2019-07-24 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:40:18PM +0300, Teemu Toivola wrote: Hi, > See the discussion in bug #907020 [1] for all details. The short version is > that in August 2018 Christian introduced new autopkgtest tests in 1.18-2 > which didn't work due to lack of root access. #907020 was opened as a > res

Bug#932843: RFS: vnstat/1.18-2.1 [NMU]

2019-07-24 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:56:47PM +0300, Teemu Toivola wrote: Hey guys, > vnstat (1.18-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Changes by Christian Göttsche > - d/tests: run as root to fix debci (Closes: #907020) > - d/control: bump to std version 4.2.1 (no f

Bug#916859: closed by Andrey Rahmatullin (Re: Bug#916859: RFS: PDF Studio Viewer/2018 [ITP] -- pdf viewer)

2018-12-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 05:12:39PM -0500, Studio Support wrote: > Hello Andrey, > > Regarding the solution on Bug#916859 about our package "pdfstudioviewer" > > It's free in the real sense of the term, meaning that users don't pay for it. > But it is not open source. Our end-user license is disp

Bug#893052: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4.1-1 [I maintain the package]

2018-03-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:38:37PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 08:06:13PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Hi, > > uploaded the package. I've to make up my mind about the kind of linux > > specific > > arch all pac

Bug#893052: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4.1-1 [I maintain the package]

2018-03-21 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:38:37PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi Sven, > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 08:06:13PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Hi, > > uploaded the package. I've to make up my mind about the kind of linux > > specific > > arch all pac

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-10-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: > I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches > are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are > updated accordingly. > With #874387 Felix is searching for a new maintainer for this pac

Re: Bug#801253: reproducing and fixing lintian errors of wicd 1.7.3-3 package

2016-02-09 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 06:02:27PM +0100, toogley wrote: > On 02/07/2016 10:30 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: Hi, > thanks. > >Additionally, lintian runs more tests when run against the .changes > >file (and not the .debs); and lintian has some nice command line / > >configuration options to enable

Bug#768251: RFS: ip2location/7.0.0-1 [ITP]

2014-11-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:45:25PM -0800, Lim Chris wrote: Hi, > Package name: ip2location > Version : 7.0.0-1 > Upstream Author : IP2Location > URL : http://www.ip2location.com Is this tool of any use without the commercial database? Are there free databases available? O

Re: Bug#712787: ITP for Distkeys

2014-09-22 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:04:37PM -0300, Eriberto wrote: Hi, > Not wrong. The package is in first upload. 2014. > > Please, don't interfer in my revision without a strong motive. Well the point of public discussion on d-m kind of is to have a discussion about different views on certain issues.

Bug#762379: RFS: urjtag/0.10+r2007-1.2 [RC, NMU]

2014-09-21 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 07:16:01PM +0200, Andreas Moog wrote: Hi, > Changes since the last upload: > > urjtag (0.10+r2007-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * debian/patches/0010_prefix_REG.patch: (Closes: #756827) > - Prefix all REG_* with BFIN_REG to not clas

Bug#757428: RFS: nullmailer/1:1.13-1 [RC]

2014-08-08 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 01:39:47AM +0100, Nick Leverton wrote: Hi, > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nullmailer/nullmailer_1.13-1.dsc Thanks, uploaded. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

Re: Backport ipmitool for stable release

2014-08-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 07:19:46PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: Hi, > on ipmitool exist a bug[1] to add "Dell 13G server" support. > > Therefore my questions: > > - Does Debian have rules when backports are possible? http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3 Two answer your question

Re: Bug#756436: RFS: mytop/1.9.1-2

2014-07-31 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:44:49AM +0200, Werner Detter wrote: Hi, > Thanks, upload worked. Uploaded to the archive. Thanks. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https:/

Bug#733258: RFS: kerneltop/0.8-2.2 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]

2013-12-28 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 03:34:37PM +0100, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > Yes I know. This URL was in the original package, I could not find > alternative resource. I will try to contact upstream, especially when I > have patches to forward. > > I am quite new to this and I am not sure what should b

Bug#733258: RFS: kerneltop/0.8-2.2 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]

2013-12-28 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:21:14PM +0100, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote: > * URL : http://www.xenotime.net/linux/kerneltop/ Found the same URL in a very old LWN article, but currently it holds some electronic cigarette weblog. Sven -- There we were, the three of us, the thief the ki

Re: RFS: fio 2.11

2013-08-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:40:03AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, > Upstream maintainer Jens Axboe told me that he likely releases a fio 2.12 > this week, which has some patches merged I currently carry in the package. > > I suggest that I remove the compression setting then and do anothe

Re: RFS: fio 2.11

2013-08-05 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:57:41PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, > Okay, should be fine to go now: I'm in general fine with the package. None the less a remark to maybe think about: a) Is it worth to switch to xz for this package? b) Is it a good idea to force the compression-level to 9?

Re: Bug#706820: RFS: mytop/1.9.1-1 ITA

2013-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 05:58:52PM +0200, Werner Detter wrote: > Hi, > > > I'll check the new package over the weekend but won't get it done today. > > updated and uploaded the package. URL in manpage is now also fixed. > Also, I've informed upstream about all patches we've applied and > sent the

Re: Bug#706820: RFS: mytop/1.9.1-1 ITA

2013-05-10 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 07:31:30PM +0200, Werner Detter wrote: Hi, > > - the manpage states the wrong homepage (minor issue) > > Well, actually the first releases till Version 1.6 came from origin > upstream -> http://jeremy.zawodny.com/mysql/mytop/ > > After 1.6, seems like, another upstream t

Re: Bug#706820: RFS: mytop/1.9.1-1 ITA

2013-05-09 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:08:05PM +0200, Werner Detter wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I've recreated and uploaded the package to mentors. I've rewritten > debian/rules from scratch to get > rid of the "old build style" from the origin package maintainer. > > Could anyone please have a look at th

Re: Bug#706820: RFS: mytop/1.9.1-1 ITA

2013-05-05 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 11:40:31AM +0200, Werner Detter wrote: Hi, > * URL : http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/mytop/ Unreachable from here currently, when have you reached that site the last time? > * Checked and recreated patchs from old upstream against new version > - Add 01_fi

Re: Bug#703399: FS: udevil/0.4.1-1 ITP

2013-03-19 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 09:15:33AM +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: Hi, > > udevil - Mounts and unmounts removable devices and networks > without a I've to admint that I didn't follow the current way of mounting removal devices in desktop enviroments but I'm still wondering what's the adva

Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)

2012-06-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, > I updated my fio debian package to 2.0.8 of fio. Thanks & uploaded. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)

2012-06-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:18:40PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Montag, 25. Juni 2012, 19:08:34 schrieb Sven Hoexter: Hi, > > debian/copyright: > > -Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/fio-1.32.tar.gz > > +Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/ > > Shouldn

Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)

2012-06-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:57:18PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, > > Rest seems to be ok at a first glance, And another small one I would change to be more generic: debian/copyright: -Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/fio-1.32.tar.gz +Source: http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/ > though

Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)

2012-06-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:10:18PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > I'd guess you've usually worked through the collab-maint git repo? Short round of "nitpicking the wrong way" ;) at what I've found in the git repo. 1) I see no point in listing changes from 2.0.7 and

Re: Please sponsor fio (flexible I/O tester)

2012-06-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Hi, > My usual sponsors Sebastian 'tokkee' Harl and Michael Prokop seem to be > missing in action. I kinda doubt that, I guess they're just busy as everyone else is. :) > Can somebody review my updates and upload? Where coul

Re: Workflow documentation [was: Re: Bug#665980: RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package]]

2012-05-21 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:44:40PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: Hi Arno, > we do already include our own copy of these guidelines at [1], which is > also shown (mostly) filled-out to sponsorees for their respective packages. > > Of course we could still add another reference to it in the QA section.

Workflow documentation [was: Re: Bug#665980: RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package]]

2012-05-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:01PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Hi, > This is my first upload after debian-mentors started using BTS. > Below are documents I dug: > > [1] Wiki for sponsorship-requests BTS workflow > http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS Ah great, thank you. That's what I've be

Bug#665980: RFS: evilvte/0.5.1-1 [updated package]

2012-05-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 01:55:25PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Hi, > I fixed the "hardened build flags" which lintian did not check when I > uploaded last deb-src. > > Hope this version could be uploaded before frozen of wheezy. Uploaded but I've lost track of the current sponsoring procedures

Re: RFS: nginx 1.1.14-1 backport to Debian Squeeze

2012-02-14 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:50:13PM +0100, Cyril Lavier wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nginx". > > It's a backport of the package which is available on Debian Testing. Uploaded. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rpaf

2012-01-16 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:48:52PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: Hi, before this falls through the cracks I've uploaded the package to get the bug fixed. > > in theory I'm willing to sponsor an upload (well I did the QA upload > > of this package a few month ago) but I don't like people setti

Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rpaf

2012-01-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:36:51PM +0300, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: Hi, > It builds those binary packages: > libapache2-mod-rpaf - module for Apache2 which takes the last IP > from the 'X-Forwarded-For' header in theory I'm willing to sponsor an upload (well I did the QA upload of this package

Re: RFS: Cacti

2012-01-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 02:19:19PM +0700, Mahyuddin Susanto wrote: Hi, > cacti - Frontend to rrdtool for monitoring systems and services > > This upload will be fixed #653863 which is RC bug. To access further > information about this package, please visit the following URL: Diff looks sensible

Re: RFS: nginx backport to Debian Squeeze.

2011-12-15 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:23:20PM +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote: Hi, > I personally feel that Cyril is doing good job in backporting nginx. > Someday, I or some other will wake up and sponsor nginx in backport. > > Thanks - Sven :) Ok. Uploaded. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this

Re: RFS: nginx backport to Debian Squeeze.

2011-12-15 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 08:29:45PM +0100, Cyril Lavier wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nginx". > > It's a backport of the package which is available on Debian Testing. > > * Package name: nginx > * Version : 1.1.8-2~bpo60+1 > * Section : httpd As

Re: RFS: evilvte (updated package)

2011-10-23 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 01:32:16PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.0-1 > of my package "evilvte". (Programming language: C) Uploaded, thanks. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

2011-09-14 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:31:56AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > I've reuploaded it to m.d.n, and placed it on > http://www.sk2.org/mail-notification/ too > (http://www.sk2.org/mail-notification/mail-notification_5.4.dfsg.1-2.5.dsc). Uploaded. I already wrote you last time that I think, that you s

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

2011-09-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:16:40AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: Hi, > In the meantime though, would any one like to sponsor the NMU? I wanted to take a look at it over the weekend but parts of the package went missing from mentors.d.n. I made Arno aware of it in #debian-metors. Maybe you can reup

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package; NMU for RC bugs among others)

2011-09-07 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: Hi, > > OK - do you have any pointers to migration documentation? The main intent of > > the NMU was to fix the FTBFS, not really overhaul the whole package, but it > > would indeed be better to avoid leaving predictable future FTBFSe

Re: RFS: cvsconnect (QA upload) [new package]

2011-08-31 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:56:30AM +0200, Jeroen Schot wrote: Hi, thanks for caring, I've uploaded your package. > I have to disagree with you here. The point of mentioning the source > of a package in debian/copyright is to document it's origin. The > original source URL can still be useful in

Re: RFS: ndpmon

2011-08-30 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:32:36PM -0400, John R. Baskwill wrote: Hey John, thanks for working on ndpmon. > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ndpmon", Here are some more remarks, I'm not sure if some of them were already discussed, I didn't follow the original RFS and just read one of

Re: RFS: cvsconnect (QA upload)

2011-08-30 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:27:35PM +0200, Jeroen Schot wrote: > I: cvsconnect source: debian-watch-file-is-missing > > This is because the upstream source is no longer available. Well then kill the Homepage field from debian/control aswell and maybe add to the copyright field that this page is no

Re: RFS: evilvte

2011-08-22 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:00:00PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.9-1 > of my package "evilvte". (Programming language: C) Uploaded, but here are some remarks for subsequent uploads you might want to think about. debian/changelog: > * U

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted two uploads ago)

2011-08-08 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:16:28PM +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote: Hi, > > 3.) You edit debian/changelog for past entries. This should not be done. As > > the edit is minor I'll leave it as is. > Truth is hoexter (0.11.1-1 uploader) made such change [0] before > uploading and I didn't port it

Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted two uploads ago) (was: Re: RFS: obexpushd (adopted one upload ago))

2011-08-08 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:17:03AM +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote: Hi, > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > DMUA flag would be really appreciated too. I try to look at it tonight but I can't assure that I'll have the time. Are there important fixes included that should hit

Re: RFS: flush (updated package)

2011-08-04 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:01:51PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.11-1 > of my package "flush". Looks good, dput is currently running. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist

Re: RFS: radiotray (updated package)

2011-07-31 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 01:17:35PM +0200, Jan Hrdina wrote: Hi, > I am looking for somebody, who would upload new version 0.6.4-0.1 > of package "radiotray" to Debian. It is an online radio stream player for > tray and the new version fixes lots of important bugs and adds localization > support.

Modified tarballs [was: Re: RFS: minidlna (updated package and FTBFS fix)]

2011-07-23 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:03:07PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote: Hi, > Just to clarify, I find it concerning that we might be accepting > source uploads that don't come straight from upstream and don't match > what was released upstream. I'm relieved to hear that there is a way > to ensure in your

Re: RFS: flush (updated package)

2011-07-07 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:44:01PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: Hi, > I decided to take this package (and renew it) for his horrible state in > sid. Uploaded, thanks. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Her

Re: RFS: flush (updated package)

2011-07-07 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:17:46PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: Hi Fabrizio, > Really strange. > I tried to install and use it before request sponsor, and I have not > found errors I've no doubt in that, it's possible that there's something wrong with the dbus stuff here. With the devil sittin

Re: RFS: wav2cdr (updated package)

2011-07-07 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:59:26PM -0500, Edgar Antonio Palma de la Cruz wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3.4-1 of my package > "wav2cdr". Uploaded, thanks. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.

Re: RFS: flush (updated package)

2011-07-07 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:21:50PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.10-1 > of my package "flush". Some 'LDFLAGS += -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed' should help to get the depedency list a bit shortened. Otherwise the package looks fine and I wou

Re: RFS: qasmixer

2011-07-04 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 10:25:26AM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: Hi, > just for me to understand. DEP-5 is frozen. Why exactly is the version > needed now that it isn't altered anymore? It doesn't really matter because it has to be changed for the final location anyway. http://lists.debian.org/deb

Re: RFS: RHash - Utility for computing hash sums and magnet links

2011-06-09 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:09:15PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > On 09.06.2011 12:45, rhash.admin wrote: Hi, > > Ok, switched to 8th version for auto-running dpkg-gensymbols, but some > > DDs (on #d-mentor) prefer to package with 7th debhelper to simplify > > backporting. > > That's right for oldsta

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

2011-06-08 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:57:58PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: Hi, with so many replies, I guess I should write one more. :-/ > I'm not really sure why Fuddl reset the maintainer field when uploading; > the usual practice is to set it to the Debian Games Team (as Stephen did) > and, if necessary

Re: RFS: oss-compat (adoption, updated package)

2011-06-08 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:06:59AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.5 of the package > "oss-compat", which I am adopting within the games team. (I believe this > makes sense since the main users of the Open Sound System nowadays are

Re: RFS: [QA Upload] netsend

2011-06-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:14:24PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: Hi, CC'ed Tim: Are you still on board for netsed? Thread starts here http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/06/msg00015.html > Fair enough. I just didn't feel comfortable to package an entire new > upstream source for a QA upload.

Re: RFS: [QA Upload] netsend

2011-06-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:59:46AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: Hi, > I'd like to ask for sponsoring of my QA upload for the package netsed. > > It does not introduce a new version since upstream is dead since 2001 > but the package is fairly cool, has a reasonable popcon and no open RC > bugs (but W

Re: RFS: sfftobmp (updated package) (QA upload) (RC bug fix)

2011-06-01 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:29:59AM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.1.2-4 > of my package "sfftobmp". Uploaded. I took the freedom to extent your silent manpage improvement with the 'omitted' spelling fix proposed by lintian and fixed the watc

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 09:01:11PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Uploaded. > Now the only problem is the not existing write access to the git repo > of collab-maint ... Hmpf. Is this really a permission denied to write to the repo or did you use ssh with password-auth in the past? I've seen som

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:06:55PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Hi, > Sven Hoexter wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52: > > > * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes > > and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should >

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 05:02:16PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: [...] > Also done. Shame on me but I missed two other things, I would've commited them to the collab-maint repo but that seems to still miss the the changes in the package. * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no secu

DEP-5 format definition hell

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
Hi, I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of this DEP. It would be nice if the involved people would clarify what should be used.

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:43:11PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-3 of my > package "squidguard". * Oh another DEP5 format definition, and now one that isn't available. I guess that should evolve into some d.n host instead d

Re: RFS: doctrine (updated package, ping)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Federico Giménez Nieto wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.4-1 > of my package "doctrine". I'm not sure how the .orig.tar.gz has been generated (didn't digg deeper) but it contains a lot of 1970's files which will result in an

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-28 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 03:36:46PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > Re-uploaded to mentors.d.n Uploaded to the archive. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-28 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:48:59PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:26:02PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > You should also check your changelog, beside closing a bug which > > isn't fixed with arch kfreebsd-any the changelog only states the

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-28 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:48:39AM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:53:33AM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > The original problem was that fuse-utils wasn't available on kfreebsd > The problem was not in kfreebsd but in hurd-i386. I have t

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:35:43PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > > Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only > > to linux and kfreebsd and exclude hurd-i386 architecture? > > I changed Architecture Field from

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-27 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:07:55PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, > The package is lintian clean (Lintian v2.5.0~rc3) but it not reports (post pbuilder build, lintian 2.5.0 but that shouldn't make a big difference for those warnings) $ lintian -iIv archivemount_0.6.1-2_i386.changes N:

Re: RFS: gtklp 1.2.8-1 (updated package)

2011-05-25 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:17:12PM +0800, Zak B. Elep wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.8-1 > of my package "gtklp". * Double builds leave some modified m4 files in the diff. (I consider this whole 'autoreconf & delete the files in clean' thing a bit hackish bu

Re: RFS: nzbget (2nd try)

2011-05-13 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:36:45PM +0200, Andreas Moog wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nzbget". I only had a very short look at it: * debian/copyright is incomplete. An easy grep -i copyright diggs out some more names. Use something like head *|less to scr

Re: RFS: rush (new package)

2011-05-13 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:55:10PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: Hi Mats, > if a repackaging in order to circumvent GFDL-1.3 is not > enough for you to proceed, then nothing will ever satisfy > your desires. Still, I send a further reminder. I just started to look at your package and I'm not

Re: RFS: cdpr (updated package)

2011-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:29:43AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: Hi, > I've made the relevant changes and re-uploaded to mentors Uploaded to the archive. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ]

Re: RFS: cdpr (updated package)

2011-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 07:04:50AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > Not sure about the breakage with compat level 8. This is where I saw > the reference to 7: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dother.en.ht

Re: RFS: piwigo (updated package)

2011-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 06:43:43PM +0200, Nicolas wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1 > of my package "piwigo". I think you forgot to merge the changelog from 2.1.2-3 back into the master branch. The french po is there but maybe double check that it's

Re: RFS: ketchup (updated package, adopting, 3rd try)

2011-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:22:15AM +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.8+hg5533f6de130c-3 > of the orphaned package "ketchup" which I want to adopt. Uploaded. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden hea

Re: RFS: cdpr (updated package)

2011-05-12 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:55:59AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.4-1 > of my package "cdpr". * Why are you mangling a prior changelog entry when the changes to debian/rules did not happen back then? * Will something break with compat leve

Re: RFS: mp3splt-gtk (updated package)

2011-05-11 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:11:48PM +0200, Gunter Königsmann wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-1 > of my package "mp3splt-gtk" along as the companion packages "mp3splt" > and "libmp3splt". Uh that's not very nice, this is a hidden NMU against all standards. Did you

Re: RFS: downtimed (updated package)

2011-05-10 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:56:13PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > Dear mentors, > > pinging on my initial pledge. Uploaded. Sven -- I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart, comes a rebel fist [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: fetchmail-6.3.19 backport to Lenny

2011-05-10 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:05:10PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: Hi, more or less a full quote for debian-backports > I'm looking for a sponsor for a backport of fetchmail-6.3.19-1 to > Debian Lenny. The main reason for the backport is to forestall at > least the very first requirement of the up

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package, upload to unstable only)

2011-04-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:48:16AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: Hi, > It seems like lowercase would be the way to go. The description is not > a sentence and capitalizing the first letter makes it feel like a > sentence (when it is not one.) > Since it now feels like a sentence, you also begin t

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package, upload to unstable only)

2011-04-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:49:30PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: Hey Peter, > -Description: Textbased audio CD ripper > +Description: textbased audio CD ripper this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various packages we seem to have a mixture of upper and lower cases. Maybe we sho

Re: RFS: grub-customizer

2011-04-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:30:05PM +0200, Daniel Richter wrote: Hey, I've been asked some time ago to take a look at this package. I'm still not sure if I'd really like to sponsor it. I'm not sure how exactly we handle software which edits rather vital configuration files and I did not even test i

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package, upload to unstable only)

2011-04-26 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2 > of my package "ripit". Uploaded, thanks. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight

Re: RFS: mpg321 (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-04-20 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:39:58PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:35:07PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 19:12, Nanakos Chrysostomos > > wrote: > > > Another DD has told me in the past that I had to split my patches in > > > order for him >

Re: RFS: mail-notification (RC bug fix, NMU with maintainer's approval)

2011-03-14 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:36:30PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.4.dfsg.1-2.4 > of my package "mail-notification". This is an NMU approved by LUI Qi, the > current maintainer. Uploaded. I hope it works cause I can't test the evolution part ...

Re: RFS: antennavis (updated package - resolves FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-03-04 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:55:59PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, > I really don't have the same problem. That's rather strange. > Please try to include the opengl library on the command line as well as the > glut library. Try adding -lGL to the end of LDFLAGS in the Makefile file and

Re: RFS: antennavis (updated package - resolves FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-03-04 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:54:37PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: Hi, > I don't know what kind of change we are talking about here, but I > certainly disagree with your "never ever!". Sometimes there are > valid reasons to amend existing changelog entries; please see > Developers Reference 5.1 for an e

Re: RFS: antennavis (updated package - resolves FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-03-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:27:29PM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > * The package fails to build here with pbuilder (-1 and -2), both > > linking issue. > > > > I don't have a similar prob

Re: RFS: antennavis (updated package - resolves FTBFS with binutils-gold)

2011-03-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 06:48:04PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.1-2 > of my package "antennavis". * Do not (never ever!) change prior changelog entries of versions that already hit the archive. * The package fails to build here wi

Re: RFS: scidavis (updated package)

2011-03-03 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 09:36:41AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: > I would upload it but I currently can't build it because of python-qt4 > missing sip-api-7.1 which seems to be deprecated. Uploaded. Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart co

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

2011-03-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:51:55PM +0800, LIU Qi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:42:06AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > Please follow up with mia@ to check the current state of the process. > > I didn't add the DMUA+Uploader flag because that should definitely not

Re: RFS: mail-notification (updated package)

2011-03-02 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Hi, first of all I've uploaded the package. Thanks for fixing it once again. I didn't test the evolution part so I hope that works as well. (flame me later if it breaks ...) > As far as I'm aware LUI Qi is MIA (mia have been notified)

  1   2   >