Dear Bo,
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 16:40:29 +0800 Bo YU wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ocaml-linenoise":
Here is my review of the packaging:
- There is a comment about ocaml-parany in debian/salsa-ci.yml I don't
understand.
- In debian/liblinenoise-ocaml.install.in, the *.cma
Hi,
Le 15/04/2024 à 17:12, Bo YU a écrit :
Again, I've seen this issue several times with OCaml packages, but I
didn't bother to investigate. It looks like another toolchain issue,
which should be fixed in a more central package, not in bisect-ppx
itself. So just leave the lintian warnings as is
Dear Bo,
Le 14/04/2024 à 16:30, Bo YU a écrit :
I would not override dh_dwz nor dh_strip. My opinion is that what you
are trying to fix are deficiencies of the toolchain that should be fixed
there.
First to address dh_strip issue. From what I've researched. The issue
was raised by the static li
Dear Bo,
Le 08/04/2024 à 17:05, Bo YU a écrit :
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bisect-ppx":
[...]
I've reviewed the packaging and I have a few comments.
Standards-Version is not the latest.
Upstream copyright years are missing in debian/copyright.
A .cma file is in a "OPT:" line
Le 02/12/2014 13:34, Thomas Calderon a écrit :
> 1. I have split the debian-related files from the master branch. I will
> now use "upstream" and "debian" branches instead. Therefore, release
> tarballs will not contain this directory.
$ tar tf ../caml-crush_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz|grep debian
caml-crus
Le 21/11/2014 13:31, Thomas Calderon a écrit :
> I submitted an ITP (#770296) and an RFS (#770449) request regarding the
> packaging of Caml Crush.
> [...]
First remarks:
1. There is a "debian" directory in the upstream tarball, is that
intentional? Keep in mind that is is ignored in favour of
Le 24/05/2013 10:09, Prach Pongpanich a écrit :
> Thanks for your review and suggestion, I have done all of the above.
Your Replaces/Breaks clause is always satisfied, even in oldstable...
isnt't? If so, it is pointless and you should remove it.
Does ocamlrss actually install files in the same lo
Le 23/05/2013 05:45, Prach Pongpanich a écrit :
> Packaging a new upstream 2.2.0:
Sorry for taking so long, but I wanted to look at the whole thread
first... which I haven't done so far. Anyway, since you've been waiting
for some time now, I've just directly looked at your package without
looking
Le 07/03/2012 09:52, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> That is what major, minor and subversions (x.y.z) are for. If I change
> only something in Debian I would not increment x or y and I would not
> create a new tarball for release on e.g. ocamlforge.
I find this confusing. Debian has standardized
Le 07/03/2012 09:14, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> I really don't get that argument. Nothing in having a debian directory
> in the source hinders any other distribution. And plenty of sources
> contain spec files for building rpms to no detriment to Debian. If any
> non rpm based distribution pi
Le 06/03/2012 15:22, Benoît Knecht a écrit :
> I think it important for any maintainer to clearly differentiate in
> their mind upstream from Debian, even if they happen to be the same
> person. Otherwise, you're artificially limiting your software to Debian,
> which is at the opposite side of what
Le 05/03/2012 12:33, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml"
I've looked at the git repository (037a448). It is written explicitly in
[1]:
"Do not close RFS bugs in debian/changelog."
but the bug you refer to in debian/changelog is a RFS bug
Le 13/01/2012 08:59, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
>Done and uploaded. The new version should appear soon.
>
> debian.mentors dropped my upload from yesterday evening. But now
> the package is there.
Uploaded to Debian.
Thank you for your contribution!
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Le 12/01/2012 21:52, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
>For now I moved the package to non-free, see the latest instance
>on mentors.debian.
>
> There was a prerelease this evening, containing the license
> change. I've just uploaded a new package, which is now in section
> main again.
Great! You sh
Le 11/01/2012 14:13, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
>I've just noticed that there are files under CC-BY-NC-SA-3.
>
> Upstream has just changed the license to CC-BY-SA-3, see
> http://www4.in.tum.de/~wenzelm/cgi-bin/repos.cgi/ProofGeneral/file/be73425fbe77/images/README
>
> Therefore the issue is pro
Le 10/01/2012 15:56, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
> - in debian/changelog, there are two extraneous blank lines after the
> first entry; don't do that
>
> Done.
I was talking about the lines *between* changelog entries, not inside
the last one.
> - consider using http://dep.debian.net/de
Le 25/10/2011 16:00, Nicolas Dandrimont a écrit :
> I'm Cc:'ing the OCaml Team which may be interested in your package. I'll
> try to take a look tonight, unless someone beats me to it.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ocaml-fdinfo".
>>
>
Jason Morawski a écrit :
> The source package is named "dojo" and the binary package produced is
> named "jslib-dojo". This follows the naming scheme used by the other
> jslib packages. However, if the naming policy has changed regarding
> these types of packages, I will be more than happy to oblig
Harald Dunkel a écrit :
> I have a question, anyway: The game is supposed to build and
> work on all platforms, but I can build it only for i386 and
> amd64. Are non-free packages built for the other platforms
> automagically? Or would you suggest to restrict the list of
> platforms?
See:
http://
Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> filelight is useful to find out which parts of the filesystem are
> consuming too much space. [...]
> However filelight is a very large dependency (pulls in large
> parts of KDE + X11) so it's only a suggestion.
What about suggesting filelight | gnome-utils, then? gn
Neil Williams a écrit :
>> Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
>> changelogs?
>
> Yes.
And what was the prevous style of changelog allowed, by the way?
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
Jean-Yves Avenard a écrit :
> Is there a way to force which version of the dependency is going to be
> installed?
> Like right now, my package automatically add a dependency to version
> 1.0.19 of the library, I want that dependency to be on version 1.0.17
I think your approach is wrong. You shoul
22 matches
Mail list logo
