on-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swftools/swftools_0.8.1-2.dsc
Kind regards
Simo Kauppi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
omply with the policy
* Fixed the minus signs in the manpages
-- Simo Kauppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:10:01 +0200
swftools (0.8.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
* Fixed the debian/copyright to include the exceptions in MD5.c and
pdf2swf/fonts/*
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 03:03:46PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 21:44 +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
> > The new files are in http://www.mediasitomo.com/debian-swftools/
>
> Thanks, I've uploaded it!
>
> Thijs
Excellent, thanks a lot.
Simo
--
:r ~/
Hi Thijs,
Thanks very much for your comments.
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:37:28PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> * debian/copyright does not seem to list that most of the contents of
> the lib/ dir are licenced under the LGPL.
- Added the mention about libart being LGPL to the debian/copyright
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for swftools package.
This package is lintian/linda clean and it builds with pbuilder.
The debian package files are in
http://www.mediasitomo.com/debian-swftools/
Details:
* Package name: swftools
Version : 0.8.0-1
Upstream Author : Matth
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:06:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> * debian/watch: best remove the comments, and probably unsplit the
> line.
Done
> * debian/changelog: might want to use NMU-style numbers until you
> find a sponsor who wants to upload a particular
Hi,
I would like to get some comments for packaging the next upstream
release of swftools.
This package is based on the latest development snapshot and should not
be uploaded to debian, but I would like to get some comments on the
packaging so that by the time the official 0.8.0 is released, I wo
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 04:08:21PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:26:56PM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While packaging swftools, I noticed that `avifile-config --libs` gives
> > -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib -laviplay. lintian/linda obvio
Hi,
While packaging swftools, I noticed that `avifile-config --libs` gives
-Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib -laviplay. lintian/linda obviously are not happy
with rpath.
I can work around that, but I thought I ask if that should be
considered a bug in the libavifile-0.7-dev package.
And while I'm at it, what
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 06:11:36PM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
> * Package name : swftools
> Version : 0.7.0
> Upstream Author : Matthias Kramm, Rainer Böhme, De Clarke
> * URL : http://www.swftools.org/
> * License : GPL
> Description
Hi,
New upload http://www.iki.fi/simppa/debian-swftools/
Changes after the first upload:
- It now builds with or w/o lame; if the user has liblame-dev and
avifile-dev, it builds the full package; if the user has lame, but
not avifile, avi2swf is not build; if the user doesn't have lame,
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 08:21:30PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 18:11 +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for swftools, a collection of utilities for
> > manipulating and creating SWF (Flash) files.
>
> I'm not
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for swftools, a collection of utilities for
manipulating and creating SWF (Flash) files.
* Package name : swftools
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Matthias Kramm, Rainer Böhme, De Clarke
* URL : http://www.swftools.org/
* License
13 matches
Mail list logo
