On 9/07, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
| I know that is a really silly question, but I really dislike "fixed in
| NMU" on my own bug pages :-)))
Send a mail containing "close ..." in the body (by using the right bug
number) to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam
On 9/07, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
| I know that is a really silly question, but I really dislike "fixed in
| NMU" on my own bug pages :-)))
Send a mail containing "close ..." in the body (by using the right bug
number) to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On 29/06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
| Actually, the real flaw seems to be that my email assumed that
| the protocol was going to be used by people who had a modicum of
| inductive reasoning. The outline mentions just one ID in the key
| being verified and signed, and I assumed that anyone
On 29/06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
| Actually, the real flaw seems to be that my email assumed that
| the protocol was going to be used by people who had a modicum of
| inductive reasoning. The outline mentions just one ID in the key
| being verified and signed, and I assumed that anyone
On 28/06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
| > Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
| > had been under the impression that other forms of identification
| > were still possible, though severely discouraged.
|
| Yeah, those
On 28/06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
| http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
|
| it does have some weaknesses, but it is a lot stronger than the ``oh,
| i've met you, i have checked your ID, and off we go''
|
| comments welcome.
It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign
On 28/06, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010628 16:53]:
| > Does the GPG key need to be signed or does it just need to exist? I
| > had been under the impression that other forms of identification
| > were still possible, though severely discouraged.
|
| Yeah, thos
On 28/06, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
| http://people.debian.org/~jaqque/keysign.html
|
| it does have some weaknesses, but it is a lot stronger than the ``oh,
| i've met you, i have checked your ID, and off we go''
|
| comments welcome.
It has an enormous flaw: you do not sign a key, you sign
On 13/07, Radovan Garabik wrote:
| I am packaging a program
| (http://melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk/~garabik/xtell.html)
| which is a daemon, and can run from inetd. As such, it needs
| an entry in /etc/services. What is the best way to add a line
| to the file? Currently I am using
This is fully cove
On 27/04, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
| Where should the non-US uploads take place? I've been recompiling
| ssleay for Sparc and now need to upload it, but I guess it's not on master...
*blush*, found in the developers guide :-)
Where should the non-US uploads take place? I've been recompiling
ssleay for Sparc and now need to upload it, but I guess it's not on master...
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 26/04, Yann Hirou wrote:
| I would like to package an app, that needs a 700 tmp directory.
| Where should I put it ?
| /var/myapp/tmp looks good, but I'm not sure.
/var/spool/myapp could be a better choice
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ended for users.
Put in under /usr/libexec for example (no need for a manpage), and make
mount.app look for it there.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 16/03, Andrea Fanfani wrote:
| If i need to upload a new non-free or a contrib package where i
| specify this ?
In the debian/control file. Download any non-free or contrib package source
and look at the files in the debian subdirectory.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er get permissions from the author or forget
about the package...
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at need such
a library at execution time.
Now, if you want to compile programs using this library (instead of just
executing them), then you will need the package "libxxxn-dev" or "libxxx-dev".
Sam
PS/ sometimes, the name is not "libxxxn" but "xxxn" or "xxxn-runtime".
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to do so without getting a lintian error?
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Joey" == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> Can't you do an export before running dpkg-buildpackage similar
Joey> to CVS?
Sure, I could, but I would also like to be able to work "in place" to
be able to test changes.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Footnotes:
[1] For those who don't know PRCS, it's a CM tool similar to CVS in
many regards, but I prefer its spirit, see
http://www.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/~jmacd/prcs.html
--
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>>>> "Sam" == Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sam> I'm having some trouble with lintian. I'm building two packages,
Sam> gtkada0 and gtkada0-dev, the former containing only the shared
Sam> lib
o.6 (0x4016d000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40211000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40229000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x2000)
Sam
- --
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset:
control file?
4) Links to shared libraries in *deb file
- -
Lintian reports:
W: libxdelta1: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr/lib/libxdelta.so.1.0.0
usr/lib/libxdelta.so
What should I do about this?
Thanks for helping me to make better Debian packages :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I'd like an (more-than-me) experienced Debian maintainer to check the
new adasockets package I just uploaded for obvious (and
not-so-obvious) mistakes.
Thanks in advance :-)
Sam
- --
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
23 matches
Mail list logo
