On 5/31/20 9:19 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> If you want to follow this route, your next step would be now to contact
> the fox1.6 maintainer by filing a wishlist bug against src:fox1.6, asking
> to package the version you need, explaining the situation and maybe (==
> if you want) tell them that you
On 5/31/20 9:19 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> If you want to follow this route, your next step would be now to contact
> the fox1.6 maintainer by filing a wishlist bug against src:fox1.6, asking
> to package the version you need, explaining the situation and maybe (==
> if you want) tell them that you
On 6/2/20 1:05 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 04:13:33PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote:
>> On 5/31/20 9:19 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> (...)
>
>>> It seems at first glance possible that both versions can be in Debian,
>>> however, the release/securi
On 5/31/20 9:19 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 06:55:42PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote:
>> On 5/30/20 4:45 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
>>> I see those options:
>>> - talk to the fox-1.6 maintainer about updating the package to 1.7.
>>> (thoug
On 5/30/20 4:45 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 03:08:21PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote:
>> On 5/30/20 2:00 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
>>> * Update to my hints list: There is a fox package, fox-1.6 [1]; you'll
>>> know for
>>&g
On 5/30/20 2:00 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> * Update to my hints list: There is a fox package, fox-1.6 [1]; you'll
> know for
> sure if it suitable…
>
> [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fox1.6
>
I've seen that. I need though fox1.7 since 1.6 is not compatible to 1.7
. There had been API breaking c
On 5/30/20 11:04 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 02:38:09AM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote:
>> On 5/29/20 10:07 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:32:42PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm a bit cautious
On 5/29/20 10:07 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:32:42PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote:
>
>> I'm a bit cautious to allow installing games into the user home
>> directory. Game files can quickly grow large (up to GB of data). One
>> reason why I opte
On 5/29/20 4:21 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Roland,
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 03:13:34PM +0200, Roland Plüss wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 May 2020 14:21:03 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:16
On Fri, 29 May 2020 14:21:03 +0200 Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:16:18AM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
>
> (..)
>
> > There are other issues but I'd rather stop here. Since you yourself is
> > also the upstream,
> > it could be possible for you to actually review the software
> > bu
On Fri, 29 May 2020 05:33:43 + Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:33 PM Roland Plüss wrote:
>
> > What path do you think should I choose to be best conform with Debian?
>
> I would package the games into Debian packages so that the source
> data/code is avail
Hi,
> Hi,
>
> Long story short, this hasn't reached a satisfactory quality. I will
> point out issues
> I found but there are more to fix.
> * Please make sure the debian/files file does not exist in your packaging
added "rm" to the clean step.
> * Your debian/postinst script is missing the #DEB
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dragengine"
* Package name : dragengine
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : rol...@rptd.ch
* URL : https://dragondreams.ch
* License : LGPL-3.0+
* Vcs : upstream debianization branch:
https://gith
13 matches
Mail list logo
