On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:24:29PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2009, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> > Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
> > liferea's bug page?
>
> Because it's not -done.
Thanks, I get it now.
> Final
Can someone help me understand why 510765 keeps on appearing on
liferea's bug page?
It's been closed in all the relevant versions, and the little graph on
the left shows nothing but green boxes, but everything (the bts, the
pts, my qa page) show liferea as having 1 open rc bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Policy 6.6.4 says that, when unpacking an upgraded package
... A directory will never be replaced by a symbolic link to a
directory or vice versa; instead, the existing state (symlink or not)
will be left alone and dpkg will follow the symlink if there is one.
Which means that, when naively try
= 8<
> package wnpp
> retitle 465910 ITA: nec -- NEC2 Antenna Modelling System
> owner 465910 !
> quit
> === >8
Yes, it would.
You don't actually need the 'quit', but it hurts noone.
--
Ro
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:27:52PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> Hi *,
> I'm packaging gnome-translate (ITP #292909), and everything builds fine. A
> lintian check on the .changes file throws:
>
> E: gnome-translate source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.guess
> 2003-07-02
>
> What am I sup
y into a private directory inside /usr/lib, say
/usr/lib/gthumb
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:04:25PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:02:06PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Pe
-users. Given that your problem seems
to have more to do with the browser than with stunnel, it's not much
of a surprise you got no answers there. You'll probably be better
served by going to a mailing list related to the browser itself.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 44
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:02:06PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:44:23PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2.1-3 of the "wmanager"
> > package; I am h
ave version numbers < than debian uploads.
This, of course, is not my idea. Someone in that thread proposed it
and I liked it.
In the end, as that thread concluded, all this is highly a matter of
sponsor taste.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
y and the modern world in general :)
I will review your package. You made quite a few changes, so it might
take me several days.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:49:22PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > The new package is at the same place as before. It shouldn't have any
> > problems now.
>
> I'll check it tonight.
Good work.
I've uploaded the package. You should receive con
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:21:23PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
>
> On mar, 2007-12-11 at 08:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > (BTW. Always use the lintian from unstable to check your packages.)
>
> I do. I've just updated lintian but it won't give
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 07:29:39PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
>
> On lun, 2007-12-10 at 11:35 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> > >
> > > On dom, 2007-12-09 at 16:52 -0600, Lu
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:25:34PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
>
> On dom, 2007-12-09 at 16:52 -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > > You can find it at http://www.cmartin.tk/blam/blam_1.8.4-3.dsc
> >
> > I will review your package for upload.
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
> My usual sponsor (Amaya) is away for a while and so I've been
> orphaned :(
> ...
> Blam is a news feed reader written in C# which supports Atom and RSS.
> It is already in Debian but I need a new sponsor.
>
> You can find
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 02:09:48PM +0100, Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
> On Thursday 06 December 2007 03:39:38 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
> > The new dpkg-shlibdeps is giving me tons of messages of the form
> >
> > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol ui_node_remove_
that and passing
-Wl,-soname -Wl,libliscrlua.so
to the final linker line.
Any suggestions?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
stions, but to developement ones.
[Pointers to the website and to the spanis user and devel lists]
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:08:12PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've uploaded the package with those changes to the 7-day delayed queue.
> Please let me know if there are any problems (I'll subscribe to the PTS,
> but I don't get the reply e-mails from t
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:52:33AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Is it ok with you if I upload it with a string literal instead of a
> > >
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:20:06AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>> Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Why do you need to #define this?
>>
>> Just because I dislike using magic constants.
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just one question about this part:
>
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #include "grun2.xpm"
> #if defined (HAVE_GETTEXT) || defined (HAVE_CATGETS)
> #include
> +#define UTF8 "UTF-8"
> #else
> #include "intl/libintl.h"
> #endif
> @@ -1107,6 +1108,7 @@ int
- GTK based Run dialog
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package to the delayed-7
queue for me.
Thank you,
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 08:33:16AM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > - Behave sensibly when invoked with 'start' and already running
> > - Behave sensibly when invoked with 'stop' and not running
>
> So in the end I agree that would be sensible to exit with 0, if the
>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:37:36AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > Should I upload with just the change from (1)?
>
> Yes. I agree with your reasoning.
Ready. The new package at
http://mentors.debian
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 11:11:05AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > Package looks fine. I'm currently updating my local pbuilder base and
> > will upload when that is done.
>
> Unfortunately, I just realised that there are a few
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:03:04PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:4.20-3
> > of my package "stunnel4".
> I have some fixes/suggestions for you
grade?
Thanks.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
b) Use the current address, at the cost of not using upstream's
licence statement verbatim.
?
Thanks,
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ersion 3.
I will be glad if someone uploads this package for me.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:08:49PM +0200, Piotr O??arowski wrote:
> [Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz, 08.08.2007]
> > But, where do we find this who-uploads? If it's in some debian
> > machine, it's useless to us nonDDs.
>
> $ apt-file search bin/who-uploads
> dev
> done
But, where do we find this who-uploads? If it's in some debian
machine, it's useless to us nonDDs.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
b non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stunnel4/stunnel4_4.20-3.dsc
This upload will deprecate the old stunnel package, which used to
contain version 3.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 08:36:08AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:51:18PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz
> > > wrote:
> > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:4.20-1
> > > > of the package "stunnel
oaded by apt and not -cacher..
I use that, and point *everything* at it, my sources.list, my pbuilder
chroots, and piuparts. That way everything one thing downloads gets
used by all others.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 08:55:01PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:51:18PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:4.20-1
> > of the package "stunnel", which I'm adpoting.
>
> The s
a DD, and they advocate uploading a package,
wouldn't it be easier if they did the upload? OTOH, some of us non-DDs
sometimes work with potential packagers, helping them improve their
work. If my advocacy of a package is going to be "downgraded", I would
not be so keen on helping them
upload closes. After that, when
I upload the new stunnel4 version, mark that as closing the original
stunnel4 bugs.
Kind regards,
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
m it. But using latex
> > to create pdfs/ps files is fine.
>
> of course, that's not a problem here, as plastex seems to be a nice
> replacement for latex2html - I just realized that.
If so, is it mentioned in the description? I guess it ought to.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerp
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 05:59:20AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> If someone makes checking on the archive "how many packages build
> depends on dpatch and quit"
$ grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends dpatch -sPackage
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.mx.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources|wc
-l
1461
pler if there were no build rule to create the
> directory.
Actually, if I were investigating a bug in a package and found and empty
debian/foo dir I'd get confused. Is it intentional? I think a build rule
makes the intent clearer.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:43:05PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Can anybody explain how packages go into non-free? I mean: how much free
> the package has to be to be considered to non-free and which issues are
> blocker that would forbid the package into entering non-free?
A package can go into
d just live with funnily-named conf files for stunnel?
Thanks,
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > If not, could ITS = intent to sponsor work?
Would a 'review without ITS' be done by a simple reply to the RFS
without a subject marking?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 12:28:35AM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:52:55 -0500 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
> > * Your watch file is wrong, the line should be
> >http://pberndt.com/Programme/Linux/brightd/_download
> > .*/brightd-(.*)\.tar\.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:46:09PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:38:49 -0500 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
> > > Hm, could you explain that a bit more? I need the binary setuid-root,
> > > so $USER is able to write to /sys/class/backlight/
and 10.9.1:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.9
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
n upstream bug, just inform them.
I hope you find a sponsor for your package.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
would have to be added in the
install-common target, at the end of it. Basically, move /usr/share/*
to a debian/mms-common-data dir.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e know if BTS is smart enough to handle this?
No.
devref 5.8.4:
Technically speaking, the following Perl regular expression describes
how bug closing changelogs are identified:
/closes:\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+(?:,\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+)*/ig
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:41:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 18:09 -0300, Carlos Pasqualini wrote:
> > [ slightly confusing description ]
>
> I do not understand the situation with this package. You do claim to
> support some SPL printers, but the last sentence asks for
it's now sorted and I've just uploaded it.
I've just received the confirmation mail.
Thank you.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:43:52PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
> [...]
> > The following packages have been kept back:
> > liferea
>
&g
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:08:36PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > I suspect you need the third horseman of the package apocalyps
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've tried adding or taking
> > out a
> > Provides: liferea-gtkhtml
> >
hroot, or what.
Thanks.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:23:33 +0100
Laurent Bigonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've opened bug #394590 for about 100 days now and got no answer from
> the maintainer (Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). The maintainer
> is known to be MIA. I have sent him an email today to explain my
> intent to
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:46:57PM +0100, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> | $ linda -i *.dsc
> | W: conntrackd; Maintainer script postinst uses debhelper, but does not use
> #DEBHELPER#.
>
> I do not use any debhelper-magic in the scripts and do not understand
> what linda wants me to do.
>
> I could
hmod it in debian/rules *before* calling it.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Summary for -release: Is removing liferea-gtkhtml too disruptive for etch?]
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:04:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:36:20PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > Upstream's response to #361376 is to recommend the dropping
Upstream's response to #361376 is to recommend the dropping of
liferea-gtkhtml from 64bit arches. How does one go about that?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Zenophobia: the irrational fear of convergent sequences.
signatur
with the help of the web and some maintainers of VDR)
> but
> am new to packaging at all ;)
I am not a DD, but I can help you get your package in a good enough
shape for you to request a sponsor.
Please send the URL to your source package's .dsc file so I can have a
look at it.
--
R
Peeters
It can be distributed under the terms of the so and so license,
available at
/usr/share/licences/so-and-so
in a Debian system.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Billboard billboard burning bright / in my windshield every night.
L
ns usr/sbin, which is unneeded, since you ship
it empty. Take it out. Better yet, take the whole file out, as you do
not need to ship any dir that's not created by your install.
And, a final comment, please give some license statement concerning
the packaging itself, in the copyright file.
--
that case, and seeing the way the program
seems to use them, the whole /usr/share/LiE dir should move to /usr/lib
---
Once you make these changes, repost your sponsor request.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC
over-specified. (>= 4) is enough.
- You missed a build-depends on bison.
debian/rules:
- Remove commented out lines
I'll probably have further comment, as soon as my local mirror stops
sulking and it lets me upgrade my pbuild chroot :-/
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81
sts and mathematicians, so I think it is useful to have in
> the Debian repository. I never made a Debian package before though so
> this will probably need some fine-tuning. Anyone who can help me?
I cannot sponsor you, but I will review your work and give you pointers.
--
Rodrigo Galla
vision and upload.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 07:36:42PM +0100, Loïc Le Guyader wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "harminv".
IANADD, so I can't sponsor, but I have reviewed your package and have
the following comments:
$ lintian -I
W: libharminv: non-dev-pkg-with-shlib-symlink usr
because it is completely useless without (at least) one of them.
So, does one break the no-circular-dependencies rule here? Get one of the
packages
to Recommend: the other? Downgrade and wontfix the bug report (#386685)
with a link to the thread on -devel? Close it?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
--
To
What does one do with an inactive unreproducible important bug? (#368546)
Close it? After how long?
Last mail from submitter was four months ago. No one else has ever
seen it, either in Debian or in upstream mailing list.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49
Ok. I'll file a bug agains linda asking to fix it's wording. lintian's
wording is clear enough IMHO, I'll suggest they copy that one.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
oduced by the
source package.
Any hints?
[1] I need to override because the error could only be *fixed* by
repackaging the .orig.tar.gz, which I don't want to do for so little a
thing, when the problem can be adequately worked around.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC
necessary to put information about the copyright of
> the patch in debian/copyright...
So, probably the right thing is to put the copyright information and
quote the author's mail in there.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
exists. What
you can't assume is any file there will exist for long.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ust be included on them. USE
* THIS VERSION WITH CARE. THIS VERSION VERY LIKELY WILL KILL ANY POTENTIAL
* FOR LATER COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE SOFTWARE.]
--------
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:01:47AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:26:53PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:27:43PM +0200, kku wrote:
> > > Now to detect that the user did (not) change the conf file, I check the
&
postinst instead. This script allows one to
maintain files in /etc, preserving user changes and in general
offering the same facilities while upgrading that dpkg normally
provides for "conffiles".
...
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Others might have more comments.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
do this test? (I can setup a small repository if necessary).
Yep, that's the way. I used reprepro, but any way of creating it
should work, then added the deb line to the chroot's
/etc/apt/sources.list Use --keep-sources-list and a prebuilt base.tgz
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprin
files or packages are mine.
I have added those files as -i options and completed the run that
way. The question is, should I file bugs against those packages?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:32:12PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
> So is the lintian test wrong? Should it only be checking for rpaths that
> aren't system directories?
good question!
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
binary, which can no longer find the needed
> library. Any suggestions? Is rpath okay in this case? The needed library
> is coming from /usr/lib/courier-authlib.
In this case, I believe it is correct. rpath is bad when it points to
a system dir such as /usr/lib. Is good when it points t
where it appears in the Makefiles before running make. But
this case is easy, because it's only put in one place (by rep-config)
and I checked manually that everything still compiles/runs afterwards.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
feels wrong to separate them, even though they clearly are
arch-indep files.
And, another question, should the -indep package Depend: on the -dep
one? Its files are, on the whole, useles without it, but I don't
really understand if it's right to have such interdependency.
Thanks.
guideline on when to do this?
Creating more binary packages certainly has some sort of cost (The
size of the packages file, at least). How do I estimate those costs?
How do I estimate the savings gained from splitting?
(number of archs) * (size of _all.deb)?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerpri
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 07:07:10PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 12:46:37AM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> >sawfish, a window manager implemented in lisp, has been orphaned by its
> >previous maintainer (#373702)
> >
> >I wou
which
> > still remained.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/u/ is currently empty.
>
> Huh?
>
mentors.debian.net just changed server/implementation/you-name-it. Users need to
re-register and re-upload their packages.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
--
To
hanks.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
90 matches
Mail list logo
