Bug#958826: RFS: materia-gtk-theme/20200320-0.1 [NMU] -- Material Design theme for GNOME/GTK+ based desktop environments

-gtk-theme Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/materia-gtk- theme/materia-gtk-theme_20200320-0.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New upstream version 20200320 Regards, Roberto De Oliveira

About the upload process for a NMU package / patch

o upload a NMU package? Thanks in advanced. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2020/02/msg00089.html [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945847#10 -- Saludos, Roberto De Oliveira

Re: I want to collaborate with materia-gtk-theme

) escribió: > Hi Roberto, > > On 2020-02-14T18:07-0400, Roberto De Oliveira wrote: > >Hi Everyone! > > > >I realized materia-gtk-theme could be easily update with latest > >upstream version, actually I did a test with gbp and installed on my > >computer and it&

I want to collaborate with materia-gtk-theme

(and star a path to become my self into a Debian Contributor). -- Saludos, Roberto De Oliveira

Bug#903880: Bug#903815: ITP: pw -- A simple command-line password manager

self and others in the spirit in which it was intended: to help you produce a better free software tool and to improve as a developer. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:59:27 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 02:14:17PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote: > > Thanks Roberto. > > > > wRar, do you still any concern about this package? > Nope, uploaded. Thank you Roberto. Thanks for uploading the packa

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 00:00:30 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 03:48:10PM -0300, Roberto Oliveira wrote: > > > W: oprofile-jit: package-has-unnecessary-activation-of-ldconfig-trigger > > oprofile-jit installs a file under /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ that allows

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 22:33:48 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > dpkg-gencontrol: warning: Depends field of package libopagent-dev: unknown > substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends} Fixed. > I: oprofile source: duplicate-short-description libopagent1 libopagent-dev Fixed. > W: oprofil

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, On Sat, 2 Sep 2017 22:44:24 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > libopagent.so should be in -dev. Fixed. > I think /etc/ld.so.conf.d/oprofile-jit.conf should be in oprofile-jit. Fixed. > I think you had a .symbols file for libopagent1, you should use it again. Fixed. I'm using it again

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, I found something wrong in the last version I sent, so I just sent a new version. So in case you already did a "dget -x", please, do it again. Regards, Roberto Oliveira.

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:52:12 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Please upgrade to the current Standards-Version. Fixed. > Why do you use "rm `find . -name "*.la"`" instead of "find . -name "*.la" > -delete"? Fixed > Why do you ship static versions of the plugins? Fixed. Don't need t

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 23:52:48 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:45:56PM -0300, Roberto Oliveira wrote: > > > I still see a lot of old junk in debian/control: > > > - did you write that Build-Depends? if no, please write them from scratch

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Hi Andrey, I think I did all the changes you suggested, can you take a look on it again, please? > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > I still see a lot of old junk in debian/control: > - did you write that Build-Depends? if no, please write them from scratch, > making sure they are complete and n

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

Thanks for reviewing it Andrey! I tried to apply your suggestions in the package and also made some other improvements. Hope it looks better now.

Bug#869926: RFS: oprofile/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/oprofile Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/oprofile/oprofile_1.2.0-1.dsc Regards, Roberto Oliveira

Bug#835975: RFS: triops/9.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "triops" Package name: triops Version : 9.0-1 Upstream Author : Roberto S. Galende URL : http://github.com/circulosmeos/triops License : GPL

Bug#827487: bytes-circle_2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Adam, It appears as just amd64, when it's marked "any", but I don't know if it'll be compiled for other architectures or I'm just too impatient :-)

Bug#827487: bytes-circle_2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

It'd be available now: I didn't toggle the 'needs a sponsor?' option.

Bug#827487: bytes-circle_2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, I've updated license in source code and also at github.com to match it, with "GPL v3 or higher". I'd update the man page with very few mathematical details (hope this doesn't disturb the process). Thank you.

Bug#827487: RFS: circle/2.2-1 [ITP]

> Where did the upstream tarball come from? There is no watch file, and > debian/copyright points to , > which doesn't have a release for version 2.2. It comes from that git and the URL @wordpress, which are both mine: I've upgraded to v2.2 for the chang

Bug#827487: RFS: circle/2.2-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bytes-circle" Package name: bytes-circle Version : 2.2-2 Upstream Author : Roberto S. Galende URL : https://circulosmeos.wordpress.com/2015/10/10/statist

Bug#827487: RFS: circle/2.2-1 [ITP]

2016-06-17 1:06 GMT+02:00 Adam Borowski : > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:50:02PM +0200, Roberto S. Galende wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "circle" > > > > Package name: circle > > Version :

Bug#827487: RFS: circle/2.2-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "circle" Package name: circle Version : 2.2-1 Upstream Author : Roberto S. Galende URL : http://wp.me/p2FmmK-96 License : GPL 3 Section

Re: Packaging Telegram Desktop

stall it according to FHS? -- Saludos, Roberto De Oliveira

Packaging Telegram Desktop

would like to mentor me? Thanks in advance. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767418 -- Saludos, Roberto De Oliveira

Hai saputo la novità?

Title Arrotonda il tuo stipendio con il Forex [http://ds.databaseacross.it/frd.php?c=eyJpZENsaSI6Ijk1MSIsImlkQ2FtcCI6MzExNzQ1LCJjb2QiOjU4NzM2MzAsImNhdCI6IiIsImNudCI6IklUQSIsImxpc3QiOiJsaXN0X0FscGhhNTdfIiwiZW1haWwiOiJkZWJpYW4tbWVudG9yc0BsaXN0cy5kZWJpYW4ub3JnIn0= Sco

Bug#733022: ITP missing for package arnu with RFS 733022 with ITP in title

I'm working yet. Thanks Em 21-01-2014 08:39, Mònica Ramírez Arceda escreveu: According to [0], arnu has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 733022 title. Please, could you file this ITP bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt

Bug#733022: RFS: arnu/1.0-2 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arnu" * Package : arnu Version : 1.0-2 Upstream Author : Roberto Luiz Debarba * URL :http://sourceforge.net/projects/arnu/ <http://so

RFS: pyenchant (updated package)

nd regards Roberto C. Morano -- Roberto C. Morano Área de Proyectos Emergya Consultoría. Tlf: +34 954 51 75 77 Fax: +34 954 51 64 73 http://www.emergya.es -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Re: RFS: libemail-find-perl and libhtml-fromtext-perl bug fix update.

it access to teh svn repo. The advantage of doing that is you can simply mark your package as ready for release and then one of the DDs participating in the group will simply sponsor your package for you. No need to upload anywhere. No need to request sponsorship. Regards, -Rober

Re: RFS: ntfs-config

sg00055.html Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: debian files in sourceforge cvs

ges. The reason is that the Debian native pacakage has no .orig.tar.gz and .diff.gz. Only a single .tar.gz. That means that *every* single package update requires incrementing the "upstream" version number and uploading the entire source all over again, even for trivial packaging-relate

Re: About md5sums of debian sources

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 03:06:16PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tuesday 5 June 2007 06:54, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > Yes. But then what of projects like OpenOffice.org and gcc? > > No one has said that bzip2 should be *required* as a compression format, only > a poss

Re: About md5sums of debian sources

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:59:16PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 00:54 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > I am relatively certain that on those machines, the speed boost of > > using > > gzip compression over bzip2 compression is probably

Re: About md5sums of debian sources

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:31:24PM -0400, Simon wrote: > On 6/2/07, Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Because on some architectures, there are not 2 GHz dual-core or > >quad-core CPUs available. Making them take double or triple the time > >for a 10%

Re: About md5sums of debian sources

d-core CPUs available. Making them take double or triple the time for a 10% gain space is probably not acceptable. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Prompt to install missing software?

Additionally, if the features are that nice to have why not make the packages which provide the functionality Recommended? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: libsvm (updated package)

beginning of each short description. All the package management tools display the package name and the short description together. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: libsvm (updated package)

vm-tools - The LIBSVM binary tools > libsvm2- The LIBSVM shared library Could you choose a short description for libsvm2 that says something about what the library gives you access to? Something like libpq4? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto ht

Re: bugreport, debian, ubuntu

requires some bandwidth. > Something like apt-move along with apt-proxy or apt-cacher would help out a great deal. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Packages + Maintainer e-mail address change

hangelog entries from then on. No need to orphan the packages. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: staying in stable but compiling for sid

ry! > Wait a minute. You mean that the package has to do more than compile successfully? :-) Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: libphp-facebook

nc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : > http://developers.facebook.com/documentation.php?doc=clients > * License : FreeBSD FreeBSD is not a license. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Using debconf to notify of serious postinst problems

YES|NO" sort of option and have the startup or init script check that. Then if the install is unattended, the admin has to go in later, create the databases and set the ENABLED variable in the defaults file. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~rober

Re: Native package versus orig

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Sunday 18 March 2007 21:49, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > Also, a native package means that there > > is no .diff.gz. That means that every version creates a new > > .orig.tar.gz which consumes more mirro

Re: Native package versus orig

means that there is no .diff.gz. That means that every version creates a new .orig.tar.gz which consumes more mirror space. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Claiming a binary name used in Sarge but not in Etch.

rns a non-true return value. [0] Regards, -Roberto [0] http://www.davidpashley.com/articles/writing-robust-shell-scripts.html -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: backports.org became really shitty for php5-mysql and mysql-server-5.0

e security team or the QA team may be nice enough to do a QA upload of the new version of the package (as many upstream developers release security fixes by releasing whole new versions), but nobody is obligated to do that. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: chatplus

lintian and linda, they will check the source and the binary packages for you. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

mething is missing or added. For example, many packages have .dfsg. in the name since they have had source files or documentation removed because they were non-free. Removing the shipped embedded library does not functionaly change the package, since those components will be substituted by th

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

ends/libvorbis.so.0 > This will certainly get your package rejected by the ftp-masters. All of those libraries exist in their own packages on Debian, you need to link against those. Embedding libraries like that has been a great source of headaches to the security team, hence the policy. Regards

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:17:16PM +0100, olaf wrote: > On Saturday 03 March 2007 19:17, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > Are those files platform dependent or platform independent? > > > > Regards, > > > > -Roberto > Hi Roberto > > They are platform indepe

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

sr/lib/legends/show/ui.unf > Are those files platform dependent or platform independent? Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

rectory /usr/share/games/legends/ . > Its still only hosted on http://hosted.filefront.com/0laf , but i ll try to > upload it to mentors.debian.net. > Umm, having binaries anywhere in /usr/share is a policy violation. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people

Re: REALLY OT: News Flash

t might make it slightly more likely to get what you want. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:59:32PM +, Neil Williams wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:28:10 -0500 > "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Right. However, I think we are rapidly approaching overkill in this > > discussion. How about this: &g

Re: [OT] svn rollback

ts, no? :-) > No, there is no api to remove revisions, which is why its an unusual > event :). > There is wisdom in what the svn devs did. :-) > Other VCS's however, allow rollbacks to occur much more easily ;). > Yes, like CVS, which "encourages" admins to manually

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

we are rapidly approaching overkill in this discussion. How about this: * the version string includes the date * the changelog mentions the exact rev No ambiguity. Someone interested in the source would (or should) have the wherewithal to look at the changelog or other documentation if he

Re: native packages

pt the > debian files, then copy the debian files in to make a diff? > A parallel branch structure might make sense in your case. Then you can just merge trunk changes up to your branch periodically. As long as you use dpatch and don't touch any "upstream" files, you will never

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

just as looking up a normal release string would > do - it also uniquely identifies the point at which the upstream code > was packaged - again, just as a release string is intended to do. > I see your point. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:17:37AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 19:51 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > I disagree. How do I know that r91 was committed two days ago? > > This also does not hold for regular, released versions. I don't see why >

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

;& would be more appropriate. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

t; of the program. Without it, the user would be required to look at the source control upstream to see when it was committed. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

checkout or packup a working directory. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

worlds" approach. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:14:50PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Hi! > > On 1/22/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I guess it depends. If there has been no "stable" release with a > >version number, then something like 20070112svn

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

anyone not intimately familiar with development of that package. For something that has had stable releases and you are packaging snapshots between releases, I would do something 1.1.15~20070112svn for the upstream version. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~rob

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:57:14PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > I would not seriously expect anyone to sponsor a package of mine with an > > outstanding > > issue like that. > > please read the whole mail about his debian/rules and why

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

son, even when given none, is perfectly valid. > Yes, but enforcing your preferences on someone makes you come off as elitist. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

e sorts of preference issues out there. I don't think that pointing them out is wrong, but I don't think that someone forcing their view of what they think is right is justified, unless there is something in policy or the developer reference or lintian/linda to provide justification. Re

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

quot; It is completely different to say, "I won't sponsor your package because I don't like the changelog format you used." Now, if something is a legitimate issue, it should be identified by lintian and/or linda in addition to being mentioned in policy and/or the developer referen

Re: reasons why downgrades are Not Supported

programs check for older-styler formats of their own files/whatevers and not newer. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: fspanel -- minimalist panel for X

On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:13:11PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > * the homepage entry should have *two* leading spaces. > IIRC, this was dsicussed recently and it is basically a matter of preference. I could be wrontg, though. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. San

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:59:30PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:32:21PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > > > > I disagree. I think that while it is not the majority, a sizeable > > portion of the user base installs a home-rolled kernel.

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

, I'd file a bug. If I used reportbug, it would also indicate that I had the "correct" kernel installed, but not running and you would end up with a bug report along the lines of "it doesn't work". Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

on is > required. > Right. But depending on a particular kernel image is an artificial limitation. If I roll my own kernel without using Debian tools (which is a fairly common practice), why should I have to work around your package's dependencies to get it installed? Simply document wh

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

iple versions of a library available and have them all be usable simultaneously. With a kernel, you boot A and kernel B is no longer running or accessible. You boot B and A is no longer running or accessible. By accessible, I mean for runtime use. This is not true of a library. Regards, -R

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

But enough people build non-packaged kernels that it is not really fair to exclude them. Add to that the fact that the presence of a particular kernel image package in no way guarantees that it is that particular kernel that is running, and you it is plain that it is not necessary to depend on a pa

Re: Bad practice to make a package depend on a specific kernel image

; What if the kernels on those machines are installed by hand? Thus, dpkg won't know about them. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Does a DD become solely responsible for abandonware in Debian?

ou essentially accept the responsibility of being the upstream maintainer as well. On the plus side, you are not likely to disagree with yourself about Debian-related things and you are not likely to do things to make the Debian packaging more difficult than it needs to be. Regards, -Roberto

Re: RFS toshset

On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 01:50:16PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > tiCo is working on uploading toshset for me. > ^ > > I don't think so *scnr* > I realized that in his last message to me, where he mentioned he

Re: RFS toshset

tiCo is working on uploading toshset for me. Thanks, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS toshset

Would someone kindly upload my new toshset package? http://people.connexer.com/~roberto/debian/uploads/toshset_1.72-1.dsc Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Handling bugs

ian or in upstream mailing list. > It depends. If you feel someone else may erroneously report it, tag it unreproducible, mark it wishlist or something and leave it open. If not, then just close it. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto ht

Re: Depending on an essential package

licy and/or the developer reference. Hopefully, you have read both of those. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Packaging automation - separation of 'debian/' directory

imagine it's such a common requirement that there must be good > examples to work from. > Check out tools like cvs-buildpackage or svn-package, depending on your chosen VCS. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Homepage in debian/control (was: RFS: queuegraph (take two))

orsement by the Debian project. However, if there is a way to tell (by dpkg, apt, aptitude, etc) if a package came from an official repository, then this could work. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Huge private Debian repository...

> Can anyone point me to the approprieted resources please? > > Curently I have over 480 packages to custom applications to maintain... > You probably want to setup dak. It is now a package officially in Debian and there is an alioth project where development takes

Re: RFS: python-musicbrainz2

On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 09:08:35AM +0200, Luká?? Lalinský wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > OK. Two more things and I think your package will be ready. > > Thanks a lot for looking at it. > OK. No problem. I will be "sponsoring" your package. That is, I

Re: RFS: python-musicbrainz2

On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:14:25AM +0200, Luká?? Lalinský wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > [...] > > Basically, you should change the mentioned dependencies so that they are > > Build-Depends instead of Build-Depends-Indep. > > Thanks, I've changed it to:

Re: RFS: python-musicbrainz2

mentioned dependencies so that they are Build-Depends instead of Build-Depends-Indep. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: Xindy

gs/debian/xindy_2.2~beta2-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > I would like to sponsor this. I will check it out tomorrow and let you know. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Help with watch file

On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:08:50PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Hi! > > On 8/4/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> What is the correct line to get versions from a FTP directory, with > >> files like > >> ftp://ftp.genetics.wus

Re: Help with watch file

t; > Thank you very much! > > Nelson > > Add "debian uupdate" (without quotes) at the end of the line in the watch file. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Creating a Debian Package for a Java program...

g/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/ -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How can a non-DD fix broken packages?

as not been done). In that way, there is a review by a DD and that DD is definitely accepting responsbility, as they are ones patching and uploading. I'm not sure if that is correct, but that is how I have ssen it work. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: courierpassd

use PAM makes it quite flexible, IMO. However, I can understand the need/desire to have a tool specifically designed to interact with a particular mail server. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: courierpassd

enable changing the password via the web. Your efforts might be better spent contributing to those. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: SASL2 (Bug#368370)

If you could make your alternate packaging, I would really appreciate it. Could you post the URL to the bug? -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: How to include information about a source package ?

gt;It might be. However, the included information is (probably) not useful >>to end users. > > > So why do you want to include them into a package.? Probably in case someone else wants to grab the source and modify it. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  1   2   >