Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-31 Thread Robert McQueen
As I understood it from the NM pages, you have to sign the files (ie gpg --sign --armor id.jpg) because it says it is unacceptable just to sign the message. You would then only have to sign the message and not worry about the files, which you could attatch self-signed (it'd be id.jpg.gpg) and can b

Re: gnupg signing

2000-07-31 Thread Robert McQueen
As I understood it from the NM pages, you have to sign the files (ie gpg --sign --armor id.jpg) because it says it is unacceptable just to sign the message. You would then only have to sign the message and not worry about the files, which you could attatch self-signed (it'd be id.jpg.gpg) and can

Excursion into the realm of packaging =)

2000-07-29 Thread Robert McQueen
I have been using Debian for 18 months, maybe two years now, as a server for my LAN at home, which is of course, complete overkill, but I enjoy it. For most of that time have been loitering in the Debian and Debian Developer IRC channels on OPN, following the mailing lists, and reading various docu

Excursion into the realm of packaging =)

2000-07-29 Thread Robert McQueen
I have been using Debian for 18 months, maybe two years now, as a server for my LAN at home, which is of course, complete overkill, but I enjoy it. For most of that time have been loitering in the Debian and Debian Developer IRC channels on OPN, following the mailing lists, and reading various doc