RFS: fusecompress

2007-03-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
b-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fusecompress/fusecompress_1.99.10-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Ritesh Raj Sarraf -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.rese

Re: RFS: knetstats

2007-01-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> Can you explain why not automake (>= 1.9) ? > > because upstream has used automake 1.9. i'm no automake guru, if you are > sure that automake 1.10 is compatible with 1.9, then just use the newer > one. i'm n

Re: RFS: knetstats

2007-01-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >>> maybe do you want Marvin to finish it? It's not much left, only the >>> build-depends to automake1.9. >> >> Okay!! I've re-uploaded it but haven't been able to check it. > > i said autom

Re: RFS: knetstats

2007-01-02 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 18:20, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > I need to setup a VM (UML) which I'll use to test the packages before > > uploading. I'm having some configuration issues (security related) which > > are important before I sta

Re: RFS: knetstats

2007-01-02 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 17:24, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Daniel Baumann wrote: > > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > >> Doesn't it look like the machine, on which you tried to build the > >> package, doesn't have the necessary tools ? > > > > of course

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
gt;> Build-Depends. I don't think adding 30 package names in Build-Depends makes >> sense (and is the right way). > > now, it builds. > I didn't change anything in the control file, really. Do you have any suggestions ? Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://w

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Doesn't it look like the machine, on which you tried to build the package, doesn't have the necessary tools ? But, during build if the tools weren't present, the package should complain. Right ? Ritesh Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> Hope this time

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-16 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
7;t break. :-) Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." "Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research." "The great are those who achieve the impossible, the petty are

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
re pointing to. I've not changed any of those calls. And I don't see any commented dh_ call there. > i'm wondering if you can't fix one thing and let the rest as it was :)) Still learning. :-) Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necess

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hi Daniel, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian >> warnings also. :-) > > Everything well, except the following two regressions: > > * chan

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hi Daniel, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian >> warnings also. :-) > > Everything well, except the following two regressions: > > * chan

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian >> warnings also. :-) > > Everything well, except the following two regressions: > > * changelog has got

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-11 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Daniel, Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian warnings also. :-) Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> I've re-uploaded the package. Please have a look at it. > > * you should not bump the revision, -1 was not up

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Friday 08 December 2006 13:56, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > I'll try fixing those problems and re-upload. > > Any news, or are you no longer interested? I'm really sorry for the delay. Since this is my first package, for the points you'

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-11-25 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
but couldn't find the email. Thanks for the points you've mentioned. I'll try fixing those problems and re-upload. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." "Stealing logic from one person is p

RFS: knetstats

2006-11-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
tors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/knetstats/knetstats_1.6.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Ritesh Raj Sarraf -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." "Stealing logic from one

general packaging question

2006-11-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
e i.e. 1.6.2 ? I hope there is a proper way to tackle such situations. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." "Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research." "The g