Re: libqrupdate: Done?

2009-02-06 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Rafael Laboissiere [2009-02-06 01:41]: > * Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [2009-02-05 16:56]: > > > I think I'm done with libqrupdate and that it's ready for upload to Debian. > > Thanks, I will upload the package soon. Done. The package is now in the NEW queue

Re: libqrupdate: Done?

2009-02-05 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [2009-02-05 16:56]: > I think I'm done with libqrupdate and that it's ready for upload to Debian. Thanks, I will upload the package soon. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] RFS: qrupdate

2009-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Paul Wise [2009-02-04 18:31]: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > > Otherwise, the package builds and installs fine here. I would just follow > > the suggestion from Paul Wise and put README and function-reference only in > > the -dev pac

Re: RFS: qrupdate

2009-02-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [2009-02-03 21:41]: > I've also set up an svn repo for this package with the pkg-scicomp team: > > http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-scicomp/qrupdate/ Thanks for that. Could you please create the trunk/ and tags/ directories and move debian/ into trunk/? Otherwi

Re: debian/symbols Fortran library

2009-01-28 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [2009-01-28 10:12]: > re: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/01/msg00241.html > > Alright, I got around to fixing all of Lintian warnings and the other > issues that Rafael Laboissiere found. However, I still don't > underst

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] RFS: libqrupdate

2009-01-19 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso [2009-01-18 23:42]: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libqrupdate". > > [...] > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libqrupdate > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] RFS: libqrupdate

2009-01-19 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
ve will depend on this > library. I am therefore CCing the Debian Octave Group. > > Rafael Laboissiere, if you want to upload this to Debian, I will > commit to our svn soon. I made a few trivial patches to the build > system but without using quilt, so would you prefer that I fix th

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] QtOctave new upstream release

2008-11-30 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-30 09:08]: > 2008/11/28 Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I committed some changes in the package. Please, take a look at the current > > SVN sources and tell me whether they are okay with you. >

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] QtOctave new upstream release

2008-11-28 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
kely > > created > > by an editor on another program while changing the package; you should > > simply > > get rid of that file and re-pack. > > Oh, that was easy. Thank you. I wasn't able to parse the Lintian > error. I have re-uploaded the package. We shoul

Re: Trouble in uploading bzip2 upstream tarball

2007-12-17 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-16 16:39]: > Since when are .bz2 uploads allowed? > AFAIK bzip2 is only allowed to be used to compress the data.tar inside the > .deb You are right, I got confused. Sorry for the noise. -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Trouble in uploading bzip2 upstream tarball

2007-12-16 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
.tar.bz2: No such file or directory == What should I do to fix this? The .dsc file reads: == Format: 2.0 Source: aspell6.pt Binary: aspell-pt-pt Architecture: all Version: 20071212.0-2 Maintainer: Rafael Laboissiere

Re: RFS: QtOctave -- A Qt front-end to Octave

2007-06-19 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-17 21:38]: > (Note to octave-help list subscribers who may be interested: I > attempted to stick to Debian policy after all, which is why I'm > attempting to add this to Debian's repositories. The dotdeb works in > Debian's current testing, an

Re: Bug#393832: Bug#419570: webcalendar: Package dependencies must allow php5 instead of php4

2007-04-19 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 18:09]: > On (17/04/07 02:27), Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > I see a problem with the above dependencies. Imagine the following > > combination of packages in a given system: > > > > apache2 installed > >

Re: Bug#393832: Bug#419570: webcalendar: Package dependencies must allow php5 instead of php4

2007-04-18 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-18 11:14]: > This one time, at band camp, Rafael Laboissiere said: > > Is this feature under development? It would be great to be able to specify > > dependencies like the following (note the parentheses): > > I know p

Re: Bug#419570: webcalendar: Package dependencies must allow php5 instead of php4

2007-04-18 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-18 01:04]: > This one time, at band camp, James Westby said: > > That's not your job, the php maintainers have to ensure their packages > > work, you just have to make sure enough php/mysql/apache stuff is > > installed to work. > > Well, that's glossin

Re: Bug#419570: webcalendar: Package dependencies must allow php5 instead of php4

2007-04-16 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
package webcalendar severity 393832 normal merge 393832 419570 thanks [Cc: to debian-mentors] * Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-16 11:13]: > Package: webcalendar > Version: 1.0.5-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > > webcalendar forces retention of php4 on the system. Depe

Re: RFS: docbook-xsl 1.72.0.dfsg.1-1 and docbook2x 0.8.7-1

2007-02-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-27 16:17]: > I am wondering whether we should upload this package to unstable and ask the > release team to unblock it for testing, since it fixes Bug#409524, which is > release critical. Sorry, I forgot that this bug concerns o

Re: RFS: docbook-xsl 1.72.0.dfsg.1-1 and docbook2x 0.8.7-1

2007-02-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-27 15:44]: > * Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-27 14:01]: > > > My regular sponsor seems to be in vacation, so I ask for someone else, > > who uploads the following packages to Debian (experimental): >

Re: RFS: docbook-xsl 1.72.0.dfsg.1-1 and docbook2x 0.8.7-1

2007-02-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-27 14:01]: > My regular sponsor seems to be in vacation, so I ask for someone else, > who uploads the following packages to Debian (experimental): > > [...] > > docbook2x 0.8.7-1 > http://debian.wgdd.de/debian/incoming/packages/docbook2x_0.8.7-1_i386

Closing bugs fixed in experimental

2006-04-14 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Is it acceptable to manually close a bug which is fixed in experimental but not yet in unstable, especially when there are no plans regarding the upload of the fixed version to unstable in the foreseeable future? Thanks, -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o

Re: Removing non-free documentation from a package

2005-09-15 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-15 12:16]: > Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Doc packages are usually called package-doc. I see no reason to change > > that here, except that adding non-free seems to make sense. Removing > > "lib" would just confuse the name, because it

Re: Removing non-free documentation from a package

2005-09-15 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-15 17:56]: > Doc packages are usually called package-doc. I see no reason to change that > here, except that adding non-free seems to make sense. Removing "lib" would > just confuse the name, because it would be less clear which package the doc is > for.

Re: Removing non-free documentation from a package

2005-09-15 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-15 10:07]: > On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > I buy Sven's arguments in favor of adding -nonfree. I would also strip the > > "lib" at the beginning of the name. The upstream Perl m

Re: Removing non-free documentation from a package

2005-09-15 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Oh, we have conflicting views here: * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-15 14:07]: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:15:59PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > 2) How should the nonfree package be called? The options would be: > > > >libpa

Removing non-free documentation from a package

2005-09-15 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
[Please Cc: replies to me.] Hi, My package libparse-recdescent-perl contains a tutorial in HTML which is non DFSG-compliant and I have to remove it from the main package. The tutorial is actually quite helpful and I would like to make a nonfree package for it. My questions are: 1) Do I have to

Re: Bug#234942: tipa: /var/lib/dpkg/info/tipa.prerm

2004-09-03 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
rge-all and not purge-all-all. (This closes: #145519, thanks to Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). -- Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 2 May 2002 22:02:23 +0200 The problem is that tipa has version version 1:1.1.beta-3 in woody (i.e. the fix above came too late)

Re: Bug#234942: tipa: /var/lib/dpkg/info/tipa.prerm

2004-09-03 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
not purge-all-all. (This closes: #145519, thanks to Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). -- Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 2 May 2002 22:02:23 +0200 The problem is that tipa has version version 1:1.1.beta-3 in woody (i.e. the fix above came too late). Furthermore

Re: Help interpreting buildd log

2003-04-23 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-23 13:18]: > Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What is going on? > > Some cunning stunt of a genius SNAFUed libpng again; it's not your > package's problem. Thanks for your reply. I see th

Help interpreting buildd log

2003-04-23 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Hi, I need some help in interpreting the buildd logs. I am looking at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=plplot&ver=5.2.1-1&arch=sparc&stamp=1051000387&file=log&as=raw and there is an apt-get error: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: libgd2-dev: Depends: li

Re: Help with Bug #58648

2000-04-10 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
> do; if the user wanted the emacs stuff, they would install prcs-el. If > they don't want, then prcs should trash it. Right. > (But it might be a good idea > for prcs to check if prcs-el is already installed before deleting files. > :) There is no danger here, as the files ha

Help with Bug #58648

2000-04-10 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Hi, I am in desperate need of help to fix Bug #58648. As I cannot replicate it (that would imply having a slink box to be upgraded to potato), and as I am a little bit confused about section 8.5 of the Packaging Manual, I need some enlightenment here. The problem seems to be caused by the way I

PRCS users

1999-06-04 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
ELisp support and an explicity dependency on the virtual package emacsen. I am afraid I have had to discuss that in this mailing list before doing the actual upload. Anyway, the new version (1.2.14-1) is already in the incoming directory of master. Enjoy, -- Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTEC

Upgrading the Standards-Version

1998-12-10 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Is there any simple way to decide if a package is eligible for Standards-Version upgrading, without checking every detail of the Policy? Is a Lintian check enough? [Cc to me, please.] -- Rafael Laboissiere, Debian developer

Re: NMU: Incompatibility between dpkg-dev and developers-reference

1998-10-29 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
>>>>> "MS" == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MS> Rafael Laboissiere wrote: >> [...] >> I suppose that some script in dpkg-dev works incompatibly with the >> instructions in developers-reference. >> &g

NMU: Incompatibility between dpkg-dev and developers-reference

1998-10-29 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
-revision equal to 0, everything works fine. I suppose that some script in dpkg-dev works incompatibly with the instructions in developers-reference. Any help/patch/comments? -- Rafael Laboissiere Institut de la Communication Parlee | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UPRESS A CNRS 5009 / INPG

Re: keyword=value in debian/changelog

1998-10-29 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
> "MS" == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MS> Uff. What name would you propose? I will consist of four MS> dpkg-divert statements. MS> All files are found at MS> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/auto-close-dpkg/ You have already a name: auto-close-dp

Re: keyword=value in debian/changelog

1998-10-29 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Since I don't want to wait that long, I MS> modified some local tools. In the meanwhile the feature is not yet implemented, could you, please, package your mentioned scripts for the benefit of all of us? Regards, -- Rafael Laboissiere Institut de la Communication Parlee | Ema

keyword=value in debian/changelog

1998-10-26 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
yword, urgency). ^^ Is the `closes' keyword some new useful, undocumented feature of the packaging/uploading system or are the maintainers just using it to highlight which bugs were closed? -- Rafael Laboissiere Institut de la Communication Parlee | Ema

Moving from experimental to non-free

1998-10-13 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
.] Thanks, -- Rafael Laboissiere Institut de la Communication Parlee | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UPRESS A CNRS 5009 / INPG | Voice: +33 4.76.57.48.49 46, av. Felix Viallet | Fax: +33 4.76.57.47.10 F-38031 Grenoble CEDEX 1 France | URL: http://www.icp.inpg.fr/~rafael

name of changes file

1998-06-11 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
matic for the upload? -- Rafael Laboissiere Institut de la Communication Parlee | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UPRESS A CNRS 5009 / INPG | Voice: +33 4.76.57.48.49 46, av. Felix Viallet | Fax: +33 4.76.57.47.10 F-38031 Grenoble CEDEX 1 France | URL: http://www.icp.inpg.