check.
My question - without further context because of lack of time - would be
if the new version was tested. One other interesting test case is
building an installer[1] with the new udeb in installer/build/localudebs
and actually trying to test an install.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
sponsoring targetted fixes, but not new upstream versions. Please
ask on mentors or your former sponsor. (This looks like drive-by sponsoring
which makes me sad.)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
et/debian/pool/main/h/hercules/hercules_3.07-2.1.dsc
>
> This is a Non-maintainer upload, before change it myself,
> I've tried to contact to contact with Peter De Schrijver,
> but failed. So I just make a little change and ask someone
> to sponsor it.
>
> I would b
lt and when the package is built.
This frame could actually get quite big.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parts removed from the .orig.tar.gz.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t...)
It didn't run with a free runtime when I tried it (the version from
its homepage).
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
er provided us with the bug number nor with the
description of your package. Please sum up the WNPP bug report and
include the description you put into `debian/control'.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to
the resulting binary anyhow?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the source or against the name of the binary
> package?
You should file it with the name of the source package. Not that it
matters much, though. But filing it with the current SONAME would not
make much sense.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
anposix0).
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
chdir to the directory you specify, run the command and chdir
back to the current working directory.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
d builds
them locally.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
most of the packages on the d.o machines with
normal user privileges because the dependencies are often missing.
Please tell me so if there are now working pbuilder environments on
them. ;)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Fingerprint: 1710 7DB1 9A28 42FF
.
But this leads me to another question: Are source-only uploads
possible, so that all buildds pick it up?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Fingerprint: 1710 7DB1 9A28 42FF B699 7654 ED1A 3933 B2CF CDD8
when a new Debian policy hits the archives. And you
could not count on a timely update of the standards-version on the
FTP infrastructure.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cosmetic fixes only.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the .diff.gz, which
makes the build deterministic on all systems, and makes the build much
more simple and reliable.
What makes a dependency on a more or less specified version of the
Autotools turning the whole build into something non-deterministic?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To
age, but I did not look it up again.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lity older software could still be built when a new package
is uploaded for libpkg-2.0-dev.
Just my few cents,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
call it libspf-dev but rather encode the version.
If you see the -release bit as the API version you should name your
dev package libspf-1.0-dev. That was at least what I was advised to
do when I had the same problem some weeks ago.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
some unique features of this editor?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
huge amount of them.
Try "zgrep 'Package: tasksel' Package.gz" on those in a "main"
subdirectory. I don't know what kind of distribution directory you
have got within your image.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
corruption). I do not have
any media at hand, but look for it (it is usually gzipped) and change
the md5sum for tasksel to the value you compute with md5sum for the deb.
Hope that helps,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
nd regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 24.05.2005, at 13:46, Krall, Torsten wrote:
Is nobody interested in helping me ?
What is the reason ?
Why is there no WNPP bug filed for it?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r GPL violation? I'm the sole
copyright holder.
There are linking exceptions issued by the copyright holders
especially for programs linked against OpenSSL. Otherwise GNUTLS has
to be used.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
one or two URLs at the beginning and
looking German.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. They are clearly and utterly incompatible,
however, and there is some slim chance that someone will want to
package "libargtable1".
How is the tarball named? argtable-2.x oder argtable2-1.x?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e had
nothing to say about that.
Those were officially orphaned, just not yet filed in the BTS, so I
think it was ok to file an ITA.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I got into trouble with library package naming. I package something
called net6 which passes -release 1 and -version-info 0:0:0 to
libtool. The library version number is 1.0, and the library on disk
is calle
inary package from a source package. Perhaps someone else could
comment on this.
Comments on this strategy would be appreciated ;-)
Looks ok to me.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
xsitecopy I would suggest a ``Conflicts: xsitecopy'' instead of the
versioned one.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ackaging
Guide.
Regards,
Philipp Kern
efforts? At least I doubt that you would find some sponsor who helps
you to just take it over instead of following the procedures.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
[1] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
e using for
their
packages.
svn-buildpackage.
I am still waiting for darcs-buildpackage. ;)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 7 Apr 2005, at 00:00, Volker Janzen wrote:
I hope I fixed all the item in the list, but I'd need someone who
controls this and then do a sponsored upload for me.
Please provide us with the URL to your prepared package.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
PGP.sig
Description: This
On 5 Apr 2005, at 23:06, martin f krafft wrote:
Urks, reminds me of those horrible reference counting approaches in
popular programming languages. Brittle brittle brittle.
Perhaps the user accounts should just go ``out of scope''? ;)
Regards,
Philipp Kern
PGP.sig
Description: This is a
off topic here, and I'd suggest including a big flashing
warning somewhere in the documentation.
And secondly it would not help against AIDS.
EOT or follow-up to poster,
Philipp Kern
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 5 Apr 2005, at 12:27, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
If your .changes file does not say contrib or non-free, then it will
not end up there once it hits the official archives.
How could I achieve this if I package something for contrib/non-free?
Regards,
Philipp Kern
PGP.sig
Description: This is a
README.Debian. Some other mentor could also
give his comment on this.
By the way you should also check if your package builds in a pbuilder
chroot environment. However, due to the fact that you listed that many
build dependencies I doubt that it will fail.
Regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
p://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/mpi/mpich2/license.htm
Looks reasonable to me.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
[1] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/sound/mpd
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
s uses the simple dinstall method but the Debian archive has a
full-fledged dak running. So you would not be able to change something
in a revision already uploaded to the official archives.
Regards,
Philipp Kern
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 6 Mar 2005, at 21:19, martin f krafft wrote:
... and thus cannot be used without 150 Mb of additional software
I would never need otherwise, right?
It is already in Debian. It's about a new revision.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally s
p them in the Debian-diff anyway.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
st and peercast cannot be started at the
same time, please add a ``Conflicts'' for icecast.
Second point... Please wrap the changelog after 80 chars. It looks ugly
in a normal terminal. And why is "+radiopi" mentioned in the version of
the package?
Kind regards,
Phil
e changes files,
together with the ``Closes:'' header.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 11 Feb 2005, at 21:33, Martin Theiss wrote:
I am also looking for a Debian Developer near Stuttgart/Germany to
have my
gpg key signed and complete the first step in the new maintainer
process.
Look at http://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php#de for a Debian developer
near you.
Regards,
Philipp
he was willing to
sponsor me, but he has not responded.
I took care of it and intent to sponsor Chris Sacca on tintin++.
Regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
48 matches
Mail list logo
