Bug#686513: RFS: jampal/02.01.06+dfsg1-2 -- mp3 song library

On 09/02/2012 06:28 PM, Peter Bennett wrote: > On 09/02/2012 11:10 AM, Bart Martens wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> I had a look at jampal at mentors uploaded there on 2012-09-02 14:20. At >> first >> sight it does not conform to the freeze policy. &g

Bug#686513: RFS: jampal/02.01.06+dfsg1-2 -- mp3 song library

On 09/02/2012 11:10 AM, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I had a look at jampal at mentors uploaded there on 2012-09-02 14:20. At > first > sight it does not conform to the freeze policy. > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html > > Do you want bug 685839 fixed in wheezy, or do yo

Bug#686513: RFS: jampal/02.01.06+dfsg1-2 -- mp3 song library

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of Jampal. The previous sponsor of Jampal was Kilian Krause * Package name: jampal Version : 02.01.06+dfsg1-2 Upstream Author : Peter Bennett < pgb

RFS: New upstream version of jampal

Gentle reminder of this request. I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of Jampal. The previous sponsor of Jampal was Kilian Krause * Package name: jampal Version : 02.01.06+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : Peter Bennett * URL : http://jampal.sf.net * License

Bug#682276: Changes Since last upload

Change to use default jdk and jre as requested by Ubuntu (Closes: #683541) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/501d3e7b.9040...@comcast.net

Bug#682276: Changes since last upload

Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release * patches Remove unneeded freetts.jar entries from classpath in manifest (lintian reported) compile-time hardening - added dpkg-buildflags (lintian reported) * debian/control: updated Standard Version to 3.9.3.1 * debian/ru

RFS: New upstream version of jampal

I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of Jampal. The previous sponsor of Jampal was Kilian Krause * Package name: jampal Version : 02.01.06+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : Peter Bennett * URL : http://jampal.sf.net * License : GPL-3+, GPL-2+ Section

Question about submitting a package for a new upstream version of Jampal

I originally packaged jampal a year ago. My upload was sponsored by Kilian Krause and uploaded into Debian. To package a new upstream version should I log a bug against Jampal for a new upstream version? What is the process? Is it similar to uploading a new package? Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: jampal_02.01.05-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

please upload it. Thanks Peter On 7/26/2011 2:00 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:33:44PM -0400, Peter Bennett wrote: >> Thanks Kilian >> >> I will create a repackaged source with a new version number 02.01.05-2, >> with the &quo

Re: jampal_02.01.05-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

e, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:33:44PM -0400, Peter Bennett wrote: >> Thanks Kilian >> >> I will create a repackaged source with a new version number 02.01.05-2, >> with the "looks" directory excluded. >> I will add a get-orig-source target that creates the rep

Re: jampal_02.01.05-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

this time I will not change the upstream source. Peter On 7/26/2011 12:29 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: >> Am 26.07.2011 16:32, schrieb Peter Bennett: >>> The looks/*.jar files are not di

Re: jampal_02.01.05-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Torsten The looks/*.jar files are not distributed in the package. They are present in the source because I do distribute them with the Windows version of jampal. Jampal runs fine without them, and some of them are available as separate packages in Debian, so the user can install them if he want

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

/debian/pool/main/j/jampal/jampal_02.01.05-1.dsc The only change is one line in debian/control Section: contrib/sound Changed to Section: sound Please upload it again. Thanks Peter Il 23/07/2011 18:10, Peter Bennett ha scritto: > > I am new to packaging for Debian. In an earlier vers

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

Hi Kilian Sorry - I am new to this. Does this make you my sponsor? Should I update my package on Debian mentors to say I have found a sponsor? Thanks Peter On 7/22/2011 3:07 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 01:06:09PM -0400, Peter Bennett wrote: >

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

what is so bad about a relative classpath in a jar file. I can get rid of the duplicate icon file. Regards Peter On 7/22/2011 3:07 PM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 01:06:09PM -0400, Peter Bennett wrote: >> Thank you Arno for your assistance. >>

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

ckage name: jampal Version : 02.01.05-1 Upstream Author : I am the upstream author. Peter Bennett . * URL : http://jampal.sourceforge.net * License : GPLv3 or higher Section : sound It builds these binary packages: tagbkup- back up and restore mp3 t

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

Regarding the dependency quilt (>= 0.48-7~) If I remove it, lintian complains: lintian -I --pedantic *.dsc E: jampal source: missing-build-dependency quilt If I include the quilt dependency, lintian complains lintian -I --pedantic *.dsc P: jampal source: unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt I am using co

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

Hi Arno Thanks for your comments. I am fixing the items you mention as well as the ones from Benoît. Which VCS links are you referencing in the control file? I am using the sourceforge.net subversion for the debian files, is there a better choice? I am cleaning up the descriptions for jampal and t

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

in the help files. It makes sense that the documentation cannot be changed since it describes a standard. Perhaps the copyright statement for the documentation should not be included in the debian/copyright file? Peter On 7/1/2011 6:02 PM, Benoît Knecht wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Peter Benn

Re: RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

s. In that case I may include patches, which would be rolled into the next upstream version. Does this make sense? Regards Peter On 7/1/2011 6:02 PM, Benoît Knecht wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Peter Bennett wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jampal". >>

RFS: Jampal 02.01.04 New Package

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jampal". I have fixed errors that were pointed out to me after the previous attempt. * Package name: jampal Version : 02.01.04-1 Upstream Author : I am the upstream author. Peter Bennett . * URL

RFS: Jampal (2nd try)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jampal". This is my second attempt. I have fixed errors that were pointed out to me last time. * Package name: jampal Version : 02.01.03-1 Upstream Author : I am the upstream author. Peter Bennett . * URL

Re: Menu question: Sound Application

Hi Charles & pabs Thank you. This is very helpful. I changed my menu file and all is working and lintian clean now. I do have a freedesktop file named jampal.desktop in addition to the menu file, but I do not know how I can validate that the desktop file is correct. I do also have an xpm icon and p

Menu question: Sound Application

Dear Mentors I am packaging jampal. This is a sound related application for organizing mp3 files. It should go in the appropriate menu. According to the menu standards ( http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu-policy/ch2.html ) the approved menu is Applications/Sound Sound players, edit

RFS: jampal

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jampal". * Package name: jampal Version : 02.01.02 Upstream Author : I am the upstream author. Peter Bennett . * URL : http://jampal.sourceforge.net * License : GPLv3 or higher Section