shared -lc recodemodule.o -lrecode -o _recodemodule.so
make[3]: Leaving directory
/home/digito/debian/devel/pybliographer/pybliographer/compiled'
--- cut ---
Is this a bug in lintian, or am I doing something wrong?
--
Pedro Guerreiro UIN: 485331
is, biased towards high compres
sion at expense of speed).
-- snip --
--
Pedro Guerreiro UIN: 48533103
Universidade do Algarve (EST) - Campus da Penha - 8000 Faro - PORTUGAL
GPG: 0xCF32D4E7F
n1.11.2 Debian package checker
ii gzip 1.2.4-33 The GNU compression utility.
ii debhelper 2.0.86 helper programs for debian/rules
Does anybody know what's going on?
Thanks.
--
Pedro Guerreiro UIN: 48533103
Uni
der development, but it's okish to work with.
As a "Long Standing Waiting To Be"(tm) Debian Developer, I'm also searching
for a sponsor to this package.
Thanks.
Pedro Guerreiro
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:47:52PM +, Pedro Guerreiro wrote:
> In the meantime, I package some stuff, and I'm still looking for a sponsor
> to them (hint, hint). There are two packages that I think should be useful to
> potato: glilo (a gtk+ configuration utility for lilo) a
ting...
In the meantime, I package some stuff, and I'm still looking for a sponsor
to them (hint, hint). There are two packages that I think should be useful to
potato: glilo (a gtk+ configuration utility for lilo) and pharmacy (a gnome
front-end to cvs). For anyone interested, they can be
onal case, I've got my packages gattering dust :) on my site. When I
became a Developer its just a matter of uploading to master.
--
Pedro Guerreiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diplomacy: the art of letting someone have your own way.
for all the comments guys.
--
Pedro Guerreiro (aka digito)([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diplomacy: the art of letting someone have your own way.
y upload the new packages to master?
Some are not -1 version anymore, and some already have newer upstream versions,
meaning that the changelog are not the usual "* Initial Release" anymore.
Do you think that will be a problem when I made the upload?
--
Pedro Guerreir
ome original source, put it into cvs, and then debianize it.
> How can this be done?
In the Developer's Corner page (http://www.debian.org/devel) there is a
reference to a HOWTO-CVS.
--
Pedro Guerreiro (aka digito)([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---
7;ve
found nothing.
Should we submit a bug about the man page to those packages (as 'man gmc' says)
or whould we just ignore it, as the help system is provided by GNOME.
Thanks.
--
Pedro Guerreiro (aka digito)([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 11:10:35AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> BTW, you say that the library is "public domain". What exactly does the
> license say?
See the reply in -legal.
--
Pedro Guerreiro (aka digito)(
On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 11:10:35AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> BTW, you say that the library is "public domain". What exactly does the
> license say?
See the reply in -legal.
--
Pedro Guerreiro (aka digito)(
Opps. I wanted to mail it to -policy and it went this way. :-)
Sorry.
--
Pedro Guerreiro (aka digito)([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diplomacy: the art of letting someone have your own way.
s everyone is following these rules?
--
Pedro Guerreiro (aka digito)([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diplomacy: the art of letting someone have your own way.
tach goes the README taken from one of the utils (The other is just
code, none whatsoever docs).
--
Pedro Guerreiro (aka digito)([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Diplomacy: the art of letting someone have your own way.
See the manpage for further d
On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 12:16:23AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:57:10PM +0100, Pedro Guerreiro wrote:
> > > If they are libraries, they should be called lib{-dev}.
> >
> > Why? Are there any policy regarding this subject? The library is
Hi.
While creating a library, one question poped to mind:
I've got a dir called cgraph-2.04, and when I run dh_make in it, it debianized
the source tree (so far so good), but the debian/control file, is like this:
-*-
Source: cgraph
Section: devel
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Pedro Guer
work thing out.
BTW, I'm using kernel 2.2.2-ac7, but I've tried this 2.0.35, 2.0.36, 2.2.1,
2.2.2-ac4 and it gives the same result with all of them.
Can anybody out there just reasure that this is ok, _or_ if this is not
ok, then just give any ideia as to what might be happening?
T
19 matches
Mail list logo
