Hi,
2008/9/20 Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Fabian Pucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I have never built a package in my life, I'm trying to build a package
>> called dcc (anti spam software
>> (...)
>
> dcc used to be in Debian, but was removed:
b
Hi Warren,
Warren Turkal wrote:
> I have worked tonight to produce new netcdf packages for the
> NetCDF libraries. They are located at [1]. I would like some feedback
> on them. They are based on cdbs.
> [2] is a link to a WNPP bug about this package. I would like to
> adopt the package, if possib
normally you don't build debs with *real* root rights, but with fakeroot
or something which would fail in this case. But again: I may be wrong,
because i don't have any experience with kernel modules building yet.
Hopefully i could help you
Best Regards
Patrick Schönfeld
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ne a db_go!
Greets
Patrick
Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> uhmm.. i know that i may be probing your patience with me, but I am new
> and learning ;o) Well, here is another issue, i have. Thanks to Joey, i
> figured how to use register to register questions for multiple use. It
&g
Hi,
uhmm.. i know that i may be probing your patience with me, but I am new
and learning ;o) Well, here is another issue, i have. Thanks to Joey, i
figured how to use register to register questions for multiple use. It
yet does work good for me, except that I'm having problems with boolean
questio
Hi people,
as i just finished a current version of mantis got it uploaded by Daniel
(thanks for that!) i have re-started working on smstools. Because the
upstream author and me detected that installation can lead into a
defunct state (because smsd is started, even though maybe there is no
appropri
Hi Daniel,
as we talked about yesterday i have prepared a new package. It should
now fix all the things we have talked about.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mantis
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian un
Sorry! I made a mistake, when sending out this mail. There has been an
error, while updating the packages on my server. It is *now* updated.
I'm really sorry for wasting your time :-(
Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> as we are also distributing
Hi,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> as we are also distributing the source, not just the binaries,
> you have to:
>
> * either write a complete debian/copyright file covering all code
> shipped within the sources.
Daniel, Thijs: thanks for clarification in this point.
I have now uploaded another c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> no, not all:
>
> * this:
> [...]
>should be this:
> [...]
oops, you got me! :-) Corrected.
> * debian/copyright is incomplete, you need to list all copyright
> holders and their licenses. e.g. adodb and
Hi Thijs,
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> [...]
> Good to see that Mantis is getting a new maintainer.
:-)
> Please note that there have been numerous security issues with Mantis in the
> recent past.
Yes i know that mantis has a bad security history. Anyway i prefer to
stay on mantis instead of th
stil stalled. Therefore i uploaded it to my
private webspace again:
- URL: http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis
- dget
http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis/mantis_1.0.6-1.dsc
Best Regards
Patrick
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
>> ht
Hi,
Michal Čihař wrote:
> More important is that it should point to
> http://www.mantisbugtracker.com/
why this? It seems as it would make no difference.
Greets
Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
>> You mentioned that it does not make much sense to use a patch system and
>> modifying checkin.php directly. Normally, i agree, but then i will have
>> to add a lintian override to my package, because to remove the change
>
Good Morning Daniel,
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> schönfeld / in-medias-res wrote:
>> http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis-1.0.6.tar.gz
>
> the patches need to be -p1, not -p0. that's all :)
well that did what it should did. Another problem:
You mentioned that it does not make much s
Hi Daniel,
thanks for your quick response. Most of the things i will change until
tomorrow, but there are a few questions/comments.
Daniel Baumann schrieb:
> Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
>> http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis_1.0.6-1.dsc
>
> * if you're inclu
it is not to late, so that mantis will not be unpresent in the
upcoming release ;o)
Kind regards
Patrick Schönfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFbGajTKIzE6LY9r8RAoXLAJwMAyF0n+o1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
i'm currently packaging a new version of mantis as i just adopted the
package. But i'm stuck on the point, how to handle updates.
Its like this:
Mantis in Debian is v. 0.19. Current upstream is 1.0.6. There has been
huge changes in the data
tors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=smstools
What do you think should i do?
Greets
Patrick Schönfeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFXd0UTKIzE6LY9r8RAu/OAJ9Mk3xWL
19 matches
Mail list logo
