The case of the mislabeled package maintainer (Was: New Maintainer Required for ...)

Marcelo E Magallon writes: > On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 01:46:46PM -0700, Neale Pickett wrote: >> Marcelo E Magallon writes: >> > wmmixer >> Umm. I thought I was the maintainer for wmmixer now :-) > Woops, sorry Neale, yes, I have your mail right here. I used &

Intent to package: dos_conversion (Ease of Use aliases)

I've been meaning to cut my teeth on creating a Debian package for a while now, and this seems like a simple enough thing to maintain for a starting package, so I guess I'm volunteering to create this program and package it up. I've already thrown together a 1.0 version of dos_conversion (but not

Did I get this right? (1st attempt at a package)

080. Should I instead patch the source code to make 8080 the default? Thanks! Neale -- Neale Pickett, propellerhead Contact information in headers Los Alamos National Laboratory, Network Engineering Group (CIC-5) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]