On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:42:00PM -0300, Eriberto wrote:
> Hello Mentors,
>
> I am packaging a webmail and it needs a webserver with PHP support. I
> used this line:
>
> Depends: apache2|apache,
> libapache2-mod-php5|libapache2-mod-php4|libapache-mod-php5|libapache-mod-php4
What about if I don'
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 23:55:10 +0200
PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello,
> I made all the changes you asked for my lisaac package:
Just a few easy-to-fix questions/comments/notes:
* Short description field format is (Policy: 5.6.13):
Description:
and you wrote:
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 20:27:59 +0200
"Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Adam,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "filezilla".
I recently build your Filezilla package using the provided sources.
I got a curious surprise when I executed it. This marvelous surprise
w
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:34:11 +0200
Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.50-1 of my package
> "libapp-info-perl".
Sponsored, thanks to Ricardo Mones.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:05:24 +0100
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On (24/09/06 16:34), Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.50-1 of my package
> > "libapp-info-perl".
&
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:43:08 -0800
Jack Grahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jack,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-5
> of my package "png2html". This package was previously orphaned.
I took a look to your package and it looks nice, i only caught the
following minor mista
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.50-1 of my package
"libapp-info-perl".
It builds these binary packages:
libapp-info-perl - Provide metadata about software packages installed
The package is lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 372597
Formal resources:
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:52:50 -0300
Henrique Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Henrique,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.3-3
> of my package "trueprint".
My comments:
* Missing packaging license terms in debian/copyright.
* Why package version is "overloaded"?
truep
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:10:34 +0100
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think that will cut it. I think you need to fake a new upstream
> version greater than that which is currently there.
>
> mentors.d.n allows you to overwrite files in the archive, while the
> official archive
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:28:38 +0200
Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to who uploaded the package but the upload was rejected due to
the explained below.
> If you sponsor this upload, note that it needs a full source upload due
> to orig file in Debian archi
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.2-6
of my package "zinc-compiler".
It builds these binary packages:
zinc-compiler - Compiler of Zinc, a functional logic programming
language
The package is lintian clean and builds OK in a clean sid chroot.
The upload would fix t
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:51:40 -0500
"Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any suggestions what can be done?
Like Steve points, if copyright holders aren't interested in change the
license terms or they are MIA, you have two options, patch (that
includes remove omalloc dependenc
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:14:43 -0400
"Stephen Yorke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> How do I create a boot cd which can be burned on a Windows machine?
You are asking in the wrong place, try, e.g debian-user.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:52:50 +0200
Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good work.
> Uploaded.
Thank you Erik.
--
bye,
- Nacho
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:35:13 +0100
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James,
-- snip --
> The debian/copyright is better, but you still need the clarification of
> the license issues. I see you are trying to get this though, thanks.
Upstream didn't answer yet, but, in my opinion, COP
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:10:45 +0200
Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nacho,
>
> Nacho Barrientos Arias Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41-4 of my package
> > "bastet". Its l
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:53:34 +0200
Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - clarify the license, debian/copyright says it's Public Domain
> >and it's relicensed under MIT/X11, but COPYING says GPL2
I haven't got upstream's repl
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:10:45 +0200
Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nacho,
>
> Nacho Barrientos Arias Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41-4 of my package
> > "bastet". Its l
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:14:20 +0200
Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * The description states that the game is GPL'd, the debian/copyright
> > states that it is public domain or MIT. Most of the code has no
> > license headers or co
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 20:59:14 +0100
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> I cannot sponsor the package for you as I am not a DD, but I have some
> comments for you.
>
> *
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html*/-bpp-upstre
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.41-4 of my package
"bastet". Its last maintainer was David Moreno Garza, i am adopting it.
See changelog file for more details.
It builds these binary packages:
bastet - Free clone of Tetris, featuring a bastard level
The package
21 matches
Mail list logo
