Re: RFS: felix-1.1.0

2005-07-10 Thread Mike Furr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Skaller wrote: > Second call: can someone sponsor my package please? I will sponsor you. I will try to take a look at the package this evening. Cheers, - -Mike -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC0XBx7ZPKKRJL

Re: RFS: daapd - a music server for the Apple DAA protocol

2004-12-03 Thread Mike Furr
Michael A. Dickerson wrote: Sure .. If I make those changes, would you like to upload the package? Yes. I am asking because the debconf, patches, etc. were all things that my previous sponsor insisted on. Developer's opinions about debconf usage varies quite a bit(like many topics in Debian), so

Re: RFS: daapd - a music server for the Apple DAA protocol

2004-12-03 Thread Mike Furr
Michael A. Dickerson wrote: The package files are at: http://www.dci.pomona.edu/debs/ It looks pretty good. A few comments: 1) You haves patches in both the .diff.gz and in debian/patches. If you are going to use dpatch, its generally a good idea to have all of the patches managed by it, so tha

multiversioned source

2002-10-05 Thread Mike Furr
Hi all, My upstream has bundled several things into one big tarball, mixing libraries and binaries all together. I would really like to have separate package versions since the tarball is versioned 1.0, but the bundled library has reverse depends on it for >>1.0, not to mention its soname. Is th

multiversioned source

2002-10-05 Thread Mike Furr
Hi all, My upstream has bundled several things into one big tarball, mixing libraries and binaries all together. I would really like to have separate package versions since the tarball is versioned 1.0, but the bundled library has reverse depends on it for >>1.0, not to mention its soname. Is t

Re: menu icon format

2002-10-02 Thread Mike Furr
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 18:13, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > menu policy section 3.4. Ah didn't actually check the menu package. Then it seems www.debian.org/devel is severely out of date as it only has 2 sections(or something wonky happened at generation), as well as its link to ftp://ftp.debian.org

menu icon format

2002-10-02 Thread Mike Furr
One of my packages just changed its icon from an xpm to png. I was all for it until I saw lintian complain: W: terminatorx: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format /usr/share/pixmaps/terminatorX-app.png Do we ship wm's that can't handle pngs, but do handle our menu system? The menu sub-policy doesn't mentio

Re: menu icon format

2002-10-02 Thread Mike Furr
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 18:13, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > menu policy section 3.4. Ah didn't actually check the menu package. Then it seems www.debian.org/devel is severely out of date as it only has 2 sections(or something wonky happened at generation), as well as its link to ftp://ftp.debian.or

menu icon format

2002-10-02 Thread Mike Furr
One of my packages just changed its icon from an xpm to png. I was all for it until I saw lintian complain: W: terminatorx: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format /usr/share/pixmaps/terminatorX-app.png Do we ship wm's that can't handle pngs, but do handle our menu system? The menu sub-policy doesn't menti

Re: inclusion of a debian dir in upstream src

2002-09-24 Thread Mike Furr
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 19:41, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > Having an upstream debian/ is good. A minute saved is a minute earned. counter-point: Having an upstream debian/ is bad. It can make syncronization a ploblem since you have to update it with every debian version revision and is especially pr

Re: inclusion of a debian dir in upstream src

2002-09-24 Thread Mike Furr
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 19:41, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: > Having an upstream debian/ is good. A minute saved is a minute earned. counter-point: Having an upstream debian/ is bad. It can make syncronization a ploblem since you have to update it with every debian version revision and is especially p

Re: need sponsor for vegastrike upload

2002-07-23 Thread Mike Furr
re I sponsor you. Could you try to > do that first? At least the key: It has been signed. I'll waiting at that DAM stage. > pub 1024D/B056CC96 2002-04-12 Michael E. Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not me. My key is in the wwwkeys.pgp.net group of servers. I'll also sign t

Re: need sponsor for vegastrike upload

2002-07-23 Thread Mike Furr
er before I sponsor you. Could you try to > do that first? At least the key: It has been signed. I'll waiting at that DAM stage. > pub 1024D/B056CC96 2002-04-12 Michael E. Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not me. My key is in the wwwkeys.pgp.net group of servers. I'll also sign t

Re: keysign in baltimore, MD & ldap Q

2002-03-27 Thread Mike Furr
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 11:28, Mike Furr wrote: > and I also tried > ~$ ldapsearch -v -h db.debian.org -b 'dc=debian,dc=org' uid=wakkerma > keyfingerprint Bah. Nevermind. I got it. $ldapsearch -P 2 -x -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

keysign in baltimore, MD & ldap Q

2002-03-27 Thread Mike Furr
I'm looking to get my key signed and I live in baltimore, MD. (Catonsville specifically, but I can travel a bit) I tried using the public ldap directory, but ran into some problems. I was reading through the directions on http://db.debian.org/doc-direct.html, but when I tried the example, I got:

Re: keysign in baltimore, MD & ldap Q

2002-03-27 Thread Mike Furr
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 11:28, Mike Furr wrote: > and I also tried > ~$ ldapsearch -v -h db.debian.org -b 'dc=debian,dc=org' uid=wakkerma > keyfingerprint Bah. Nevermind. I got it. $ldapsearch -P 2 -x -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

keysign in baltimore, MD & ldap Q

2002-03-27 Thread Mike Furr
I'm looking to get my key signed and I live in baltimore, MD. (Catonsville specifically, but I can travel a bit) I tried using the public ldap directory, but ran into some problems. I was reading through the directions on http://db.debian.org/doc-direct.html, but when I tried the example, I got: